Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Thixotropy versus viscoelasticity: a matter of time

Abstract

Thixotropic and viscoelastic materials both retain their deformation history and are difficult to distinguish. However, a stationary linear response obeys the Kramers-Kronig relations. A structure that evolves during a sweep renders the spectrum inconsistent with them, so the residual from one chirp and no model measures nonstationarity. It survives the small-amplitude limit, returns to its baseline at any stationary state, and, for bounded restructuring, peaks near the structural time. We verify this on eight models and demonstrate it on published spectra of a thixotropic silica suspension.

Related

  1. Defining Thixotropy
    Yogesh M. Joshi, Ronald G. Larson
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Yielding versus random organization: convex absorbing transitions in soft matter
    Tristan Jocteur, Kirsten Martens, Eric Bertin +1
    Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and ExperimentPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textCondensed matterStatistical & nonlinear physicsHAL
  3. Hyperonic Softening versus Nucleonic Three-Body Repulsion in Hypernuclear Matter within a microscopic approach
    Mahboubeh Shahrbaf
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNuclear physicsarXiv
  4. Assessing uniaxial loading protocols for predictive identification of aortic viscoelasticity
    Morgane Martin-Borret, Baptiste Pierrat, Aline Bel-Brunon
    Multidisciplinary Biomechanics JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
  5. Rotating Barrow entropy-inspired wormholes versus black holes: null trajectories, shadow morphology, and exotic matter
    A. Errehymy, G. Yergaliyeva, S. K. Maurya +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGravitation & general relativityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{more2026thixotropy,
  title = {{Thixotropy versus viscoelasticity: a matter of time}},
  author = {Rishabh V. More},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.13658},
  eprint = {2609.13658},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13658},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Thixotropy versus viscoelasticity: a matter of time
AU  - Rishabh V. More
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.13658
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13658
AB  - Thixotropic and viscoelastic materials both retain their deformation history and are difficult to distinguish. However, a stationary linear response obeys the Kramers-Kronig relations. A structure that evolves during a sweep renders the spectrum inconsistent with them, so the residual from one chirp and no model measures nonstationarity. It survives the small-amplitude limit, returns to its baseline at any stationary state, and, for bounded restructuring, peaks near the structural time. We verify this on eight models and demonstrate it on published spectra of a thixotropic silica suspension.
ER  -