Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Cancer and Their Parents and for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Affected by Parental Cancer: A Population‐Stratified Systematic Review
- 1Psychology and Psychotherapy in Special Education & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Human Sciences University of Cologne Cologne Germany
Abstract
Objective: Cancer profoundly affects the entire family system; evidence for acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) remains fragmented within three distinct cohorts: (1) children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs) with cancer or cancer survivors, (2) CAYAs impacted by parental cancer, and (3) parents of CAYAs with cancer. This population‐stratified systematic review evaluated ACT's acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy.
Methods: Adhering to Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) 2020, 12 databases (including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase) and gray literature were searched from inception to October 2025. Quantitative studies evaluating ACT‐based interventions were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using JBI tools and the Risk of Bias in N‐of‐1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Data were synthesized narratively by outcome within population strata following synthesis without meta‐analysis (SWiM), with effectiveness appraised for certainty of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).
Results: Nine studies (N = 573) were included (one RCT, one single case experimental design [SCED], four quasi‐experimental trials, and three single‐group pilot/feasibility studies). No studies targeted children. For AYA populations (both with cancer or cancer survivors and affected by parental cancer), evidence was of very low certainty; psychological flexibility emerged as a plausible mediator of quality‐of‐life improvements in a single mixed sample study of distressed AYAs affected by their own or a family member's cancer. Moderate‐certainty evidence for parents of CAYAs with cancer showed reductions in distress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms (d = 0.61–0.83), and increased psychological flexibility (d = 0.63).
Conclusions: ACT shows promise for improving mental health outcomes in parents of CAYAs with cancer. Evidence for both AYAs populations remains limited by methodological heterogeneity, highlighting a need for developmentally tailored, rigorous trials.
Related
- Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on psychological and health-related outcomes in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and correlates of post-traumatic stress among people attending acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain
- A brief acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for individuals at risk of neurodegenerative disease: A translational study in inherited prion disease
- Simulated consultation room based on acceptance and commitment therapy combined with virtual reality in brain MRI examinations for claustrophobia patients
- Psychological flexibility and emotional trajectories during a semi‐high‐stakes mathematics exam: Integrating acceptance and commitment therapy with control‐value theory
BibTeX
@article{alagna2026acceptance,
title = {{Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Cancer and Their Parents and for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Affected by Parental Cancer: A Population‐Stratified Systematic Review}},
author = {Giorgio Alagna and Kim Prox and Charlotte Hanisch},
journal = {Brain and Behavior},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1002/brb3.71902},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71902},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Cancer and Their Parents and for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Affected by Parental Cancer: A Population‐Stratified Systematic Review
AU - Giorgio Alagna
AU - Kim Prox
AU - Charlotte Hanisch
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/09
JO - Brain and Behavior
DO - 10.1002/brb3.71902
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71902
AB - Objective: Cancer profoundly affects the entire family system; evidence for acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) remains fragmented within three distinct cohorts: (1) children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs) with cancer or cancer survivors, (2) CAYAs impacted by parental cancer, and (3) parents of CAYAs with cancer. This population‐stratified systematic review evaluated ACT's acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy. Methods: Adhering to Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) 2020, 12 databases (including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase) and gray literature were searched from inception to October 2025. Quantitative studies evaluating ACT‐based interventions were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using JBI tools and the Risk of Bias in N‐of‐1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Data were synthesized narratively by outcome within population strata following synthesis without meta‐analysis (SWiM), with effectiveness appraised for certainty of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Results: Nine studies (N = 573) were included (one RCT, one single case experimental design [SCED], four quasi‐experimental trials, and three single‐group pilot/feasibility studies). No studies targeted children. For AYA populations (both with cancer or cancer survivors and affected by parental cancer), evidence was of very low certainty; psychological flexibility emerged as a plausible mediator of quality‐of‐life improvements in a single mixed sample study of distressed AYAs affected by their own or a family member's cancer. Moderate‐certainty evidence for parents of CAYAs with cancer showed reductions in distress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms (d = 0.61–0.83), and increased psychological flexibility (d = 0.63). Conclusions: ACT shows promise for improving mental health outcomes in parents of CAYAs with cancer. Evidence for both AYAs populations remains limited by methodological heterogeneity, highlighting a need for developmentally tailored, rigorous trials.
SN - 2162-3279
ER -