Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Guth and Vilenkin's rejection as a premise: the toroidal universe is not born out of nothing, because it carries memory.

Abstract

In arXiv:2508.08747, Guth and Vilenkin show that the quantum creation of a toroidal universe "from nothing" cannot be described within semiclassical gravity: it is either impossible or requires Planckian physics. We propose a reading of this negative result: a toroidal vacuum cannot be created "from nothing" because compact topology carries its own vacuum energy (Casimir contribution, Zeldovich & Starobinsky, 1984). A space with topology is a space with memory. We argue that this supports a model in which the universe emerges not from nothing but from a state of a hysteresis-like medium (Preisach-type), as developed in notes 1–6 [DOI]. The refusal of the semiclassical method is then not an objection to toroidal topology, but evidence that "creation from nothing" and "topology" are mutually exclusive categories. A falsifier is proposed: if the scenario is wrong, no phase-boundary signatures should correlate between CMB large-scale anomalies and late-time expansion data.

Related

  1. The Axis of the World: a global, designated axis of winding in the toroidal universe.
    Oleg Borodin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  2. [Depreciated and replaced by V3] There Is No Nothing: How the No-Zero Axiom Forces a Universe That Cannot Be Empty
    Maria Smith
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Peer-reviewedCC BY5 citedMathematical physicsOpenAlex
  3. Two-sided logarithmic estimates of the Lebesgue constants with respect to Vilenkin systems
    George Tephnadze
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Namespace-Level Isolation for Shared On-Premise AI Infrastructure
    Micky Irons
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  5. Sovereign Inference Economics: The Real Crossover Point Between On-Premise and Cloud Inference
    Micky Irons
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
BibTeX
@misc{borodin2026guth,
  title = {{Guth and Vilenkin's rejection as a premise: the toroidal universe is not born out of nothing, because it carries memory.}},
  author = {Oleg Borodin},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23675786},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23675786},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Guth and Vilenkin's rejection as a premise: the toroidal universe is not born out of nothing, because it carries memory.
AU  - Oleg Borodin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23675786
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23675786
AB  - In arXiv:2508.08747, Guth and Vilenkin show that the quantum creation of a toroidal universe "from nothing" cannot be described within semiclassical gravity: it is either impossible or requires Planckian physics. We propose a reading of this negative result: a toroidal vacuum cannot be created "from nothing" because compact topology carries its own vacuum energy (Casimir contribution, Zeldovich & Starobinsky, 1984). A space with topology is a space with memory. We argue that this supports a model in which the universe emerges not from nothing but from a state of a hysteresis-like medium (Preisach-type), as developed in notes 1–6 [DOI]. The refusal of the semiclassical method is then not an objection to toroidal topology, but evidence that "creation from nothing" and "topology" are mutually exclusive categories. A falsifier is proposed: if the scenario is wrong, no phase-boundary signatures should correlate between CMB large-scale anomalies and late-time expansion data.
ER  -