PreprintarXiv licencearXiv
The domination number of the 2-token graph of the complete bipartite graph
Abstract
For a graph G, the $2$-token graph F2(G) has as vertices all $2$-subsets of V(G), with two such subsets adjacent whenever their symmetric difference is an edge of G. In this paper, we determine the domination number of the $2$-token graph of the complete bipartite graph Km,n, for all integers 2≤ m≤ n. We show that it equals ⌈ m/2⌉+n−1, except when m=3, or when m≥5 is odd and n=m+1; in these two exceptional situations it is one less. Our arguments rely on an explicit characterization of the dominating sets of the $2$-token graph of Km,n.
Related
- The domination number of the k-token graph of the complete bipartite graph Km,n
- The domination number of the $2$-token graph of path graphs
- An improved lower bound for the packing number of the 2-token graph of the cycle
- Wild number for spanning trees in complete and complete bipartite graphs
- Sharp Bounds for Graph-Codes Avoiding Complete Bipartite Differences
BibTeX
@misc{troncoso2026domination,
title = {{The domination number of the 2-token graph of the complete bipartite graph}},
author = {E. Acosta Troncoso and I. Caldera Caldera and L. M. Rivera},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.31557},
eprint = {2610.31557},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31557},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The domination number of the 2-token graph of the complete bipartite graph
AU - E. Acosta Troncoso
AU - I. Caldera Caldera
AU - L. M. Rivera
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.31557
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31557
AB - For a graph G, the $2$-token graph F_2(G) has as vertices all $2$-subsets of V(G), with two such subsets adjacent whenever their symmetric difference is an edge of G. In this paper, we determine the domination number of the $2$-token graph of the complete bipartite graph K_m,n, for all integers 2≤ m≤ n. We show that it equals ⌈ m/2⌉+n−1, except when m=3, or when m≥5 is odd and n=m+1; in these two exceptional situations it is one less. Our arguments rely on an explicit characterization of the dominating sets of the $2$-token graph of K_m,n.
ER -