Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCHepatic medicine : evidence and research

Obstructive Jaundice in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Pathways, Contextual Challenges, and a Proposed Resource-Stratified Framework.

  1. 1Department of Surgery, Kabale University School of Medicine, Kabale, Uganda.
  2. 2Department of Surgery, Kabale Regional Referral Hospital, Kabale, Uganda.

Abstract

Obstructive jaundice in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is managed in conditions that differ sharply from high-income practice. Regional case series report malignant causes, chiefly pancreatic head tumours and cholangiocarcinoma, as the leading aetiology, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains scarce across most of the region. This narrative review synthesises the regional evidence, the contextual challenges that shape how it can be applied and the unresolved clinical practice gaps, and proposes a resource-stratified management framework. MEDLINE, African Journals Online, African Index Medicus and Google Scholar were searched from January 2000 to June 2026, giving priority to studies from, or directly addressing, SSA settings. The evidence is geographically incomplete and comes mainly from English-language, single-centre series in Uganda, Tanzania, Malawi, Ghana and Rwanda. Three observations emerge. First, reported aetiology and treatment may reflect locally available capacity as well as disease biology: the one Rwandan series with local ERCP and percutaneous drainage was stone-dominant and mostly treated without surgery, while series from centres without that capacity were malignancy-dominant and surgery-dominant. This is a hypothesis resting on one contrasting series, and differences in referral populations and case ascertainment may explain part of it. Second, delay accumulates along the care pathway, so low resectability at presentation partly reflects elapsed time. Third, outcome definitions differ between series, which prevents comparison. Three practice gaps follow: preoperative drainage guidance that assumes rapid access to surgery, little documented multidisciplinary input, and non-standardised outcome reporting. A six-part conceptual framework and a capacity-stratified algorithm are proposed, built from the authors' synthesis of this literature and clinical experience. Neither has been validated or piloted. Both need local adaptation, consensus testing and prospective evaluation before use as a clinical or reporting standard.

Related

  1. Global Disparities in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries: An International Survey
    Zainab Atiyah Dakhil, Hasan Ali Farhan, Julia Grapsa +1
    Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyPMCEurope PMC
  2. Diabetic hand infections: a case series highlighting diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.
    Meryem Billur Miroğlu, Sibel Yıldız Kaya, Rıdvan Karaali +4
    BMC infectious diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Stiff-Person Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Rare Disease with Emphasis on Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, Diagnostic Challenges and Therapeutic Advances.
    Mudasir Manzoor Dar, Ansar Ahmad Paray, Shaheena +5
    The Yale journal of biology and medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  4. Inflammatory breast cancer among advanced breast malignancies: diagnostic, microenvironmental, and therapeutic challenges of the rare amongst the common
    Shayla Murray, Matthew Becker, Bora Lim
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Adult presentation of gaucher disease: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in a resource-limited setting
    Palliya Guruge Chanurdi Kaveesha Wickramathunga, Mirihanagalle Kankanamalage Dona Anusha Lakmali, Kuranage Hiranthi Bernadene Perera Fernandopulle +2
    Journal of Rare DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{odulusi2026obstructive,
  title = {{Obstructive Jaundice in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Pathways, Contextual Challenges, and a Proposed Resource-Stratified Framework.}},
  author = {Daniel Odulusi and Arthur Jonathan Nek and Charles Tumwesige and Daniel Izimba and Tuhaise Gamukama and Robert Mugarura},
  journal = {Hepatic medicine : evidence and research},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.2147/hmer.s649519},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999854},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Obstructive Jaundice in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Pathways, Contextual Challenges, and a Proposed Resource-Stratified Framework.
AU  - Daniel Odulusi
AU  - Arthur Jonathan Nek
AU  - Charles Tumwesige
AU  - Daniel Izimba
AU  - Tuhaise Gamukama
AU  - Robert Mugarura
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - Hepatic medicine : evidence and research
DO  - 10.2147/hmer.s649519
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999854
AB  - Obstructive jaundice in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is managed in conditions that differ sharply from high-income practice. Regional case series report malignant causes, chiefly pancreatic head tumours and cholangiocarcinoma, as the leading aetiology, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains scarce across most of the region. This narrative review synthesises the regional evidence, the contextual challenges that shape how it can be applied and the unresolved clinical practice gaps, and proposes a resource-stratified management framework. MEDLINE, African Journals Online, African Index Medicus and Google Scholar were searched from January 2000 to June 2026, giving priority to studies from, or directly addressing, SSA settings. The evidence is geographically incomplete and comes mainly from English-language, single-centre series in Uganda, Tanzania, Malawi, Ghana and Rwanda. Three observations emerge. First, reported aetiology and treatment may reflect locally available capacity as well as disease biology: the one Rwandan series with local ERCP and percutaneous drainage was stone-dominant and mostly treated without surgery, while series from centres without that capacity were malignancy-dominant and surgery-dominant. This is a hypothesis resting on one contrasting series, and differences in referral populations and case ascertainment may explain part of it. Second, delay accumulates along the care pathway, so low resectability at presentation partly reflects elapsed time. Third, outcome definitions differ between series, which prevents comparison. Three practice gaps follow: preoperative drainage guidance that assumes rapid access to surgery, little documented multidisciplinary input, and non-standardised outcome reporting. A six-part conceptual framework and a capacity-stratified algorithm are proposed, built from the authors' synthesis of this literature and clinical experience. Neither has been validated or piloted. Both need local adaptation, consensus testing and prospective evaluation before use as a clinical or reporting standard.
SN  - 1179-1535
ER  -