Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Environmental Research Letters

Low solar grazing densities support beneficial insects in agrivoltaic systems

  1. 1Cornell University
  2. 2Agrivoltaic Solutions LLC

Abstract

Solar grazing—the co-location of livestock grazing and photovoltaic energy production—is rapidly expanding globally to mitigate land-use conflicts. Solar facilities are increasingly sited on agricultural land, where both sheep grazing and the promotion of agriculturally beneficial insects are recognized as facilitators of multi-functional agroecosystems, yet how stocking rate shapes beneficial insect communities remains poorly understood. We conducted a replicated, three-year experiment testing six stocking rates (0–10 sheep ha ⁻¹ ) at an operational 18 MW solar facility, sampling bees and lady beetles across three years and four grazing rotations per year. Light grazing at 2 sheep ha ⁻¹ supported 38% greater beneficial insect abundance than ungrazed controls, driven primarily by an 83% increase in honey bees. High stocking rates (⩾8 sheep ha ⁻¹ ) reduced bee abundance by 42%–68% and significantly changed insect community composition. A companion study identified 8 sheep ha ⁻¹ as the agrotechnological optimum, but our results identify 2 sheep ha ⁻¹ as the agroecological optimum in our study region, where beneficial insect abundance and flock health are maximized. These optima did not coincide, indicating a clear tradeoff between ecological and operational objectives. However, at 4 sheep ha ⁻¹ , beneficial insect communities remained statistically indistinguishable from ungrazed controls while vegetation management effectiveness was greater than at 2 sheep ha ⁻¹ . Together these results define a synergy–tradeoff boundary with direct implications for targeting agroecological outcomes via the operations and maintenance of solar grazing facilities.

Related

  1. Consequences on energy and water exchanges of airflow modifications in agrivoltaic systems
    Joseph Vernier, Junni Luo, Jordi Badosa +3
    Energy NexusPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text4 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Evaluating land productivity with semi-transparent colored CdTe thin-film PV and broccoli cultivation in agrivoltaic systems
    Silvia Ma Lu, Arash Khosravi, Xiaolin Wang +4
    Cell Reports Physical SciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  3. Agrivoltaic systems can improve agricultural yield by mitigating extreme plant temperatures
    Joseph Vernier, Sylvain Edouard, Eric Dupont +3
    Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  4. Reduced summer carbon dioxide efflux from semi-arid agrivoltaic compared to conventional horticultural soil
    Holly M Andrews, Fabiana Olea Carrasco, Alyssa Salazar +5
    Environmental Research LettersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossref
  5. Paddy-upland cropping is associated with contrasting patterns of soil organic carbon and putative plant-beneficial bacteria in faba bean soils
    Qiong Liu, Husen Qiu, Jiejun Xi +8
    Applied Soil EcologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedHydrology & soilsHAL
BibTeX
@article{zoller2026solar,
  title = {{Low solar grazing densities support beneficial insects in agrivoltaic systems}},
  author = {Leana Zoller and Nikola Kochendoerfer and Antonio DiTommaso and John Losey and Scott H McArt and Paige A Muñiz and Todd Ugine and Steven M Grodsky},
  journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aeb145},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aeb145},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Low solar grazing densities support beneficial insects in agrivoltaic systems
AU  - Leana Zoller
AU  - Nikola Kochendoerfer
AU  - Antonio DiTommaso
AU  - John Losey
AU  - Scott H McArt
AU  - Paige A Muñiz
AU  - Todd Ugine
AU  - Steven M Grodsky
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - Environmental Research Letters
DO  - 10.1088/1748-9326/aeb145
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aeb145
AB  - Solar grazing—the co-location of livestock grazing and photovoltaic energy production—is rapidly expanding globally to mitigate land-use conflicts. Solar facilities are increasingly sited on agricultural land, where both sheep grazing and the promotion of agriculturally beneficial insects are recognized as facilitators of multi-functional agroecosystems, yet how stocking rate shapes beneficial insect communities remains poorly understood. We conducted a replicated, three-year experiment testing six stocking rates (0–10 sheep ha ⁻¹ ) at an operational 18 MW solar facility, sampling bees and lady beetles across three years and four grazing rotations per year. Light grazing at 2 sheep ha ⁻¹ supported 38% greater beneficial insect abundance than ungrazed controls, driven primarily by an 83% increase in honey bees. High stocking rates (⩾8 sheep ha ⁻¹ ) reduced bee abundance by 42%–68% and significantly changed insect community composition. A companion study identified 8 sheep ha ⁻¹ as the agrotechnological optimum, but our results identify 2 sheep ha ⁻¹ as the agroecological optimum in our study region, where beneficial insect abundance and flock health are maximized. These optima did not coincide, indicating a clear tradeoff between ecological and operational objectives. However, at 4 sheep ha ⁻¹ , beneficial insect communities remained statistically indistinguishable from ungrazed controls while vegetation management effectiveness was greater than at 2 sheep ha ⁻¹ . Together these results define a synergy–tradeoff boundary with direct implications for targeting agroecological outcomes via the operations and maintenance of solar grazing facilities.
SN  - 1748-9326
ER  -