Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

Comparative Immunohistochemical Analysis of FAP and c-MET Expression Across Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes: Preliminary Results and Potential Theranostic Implications.

  1. 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 91377 Munich, Germany.
  2. 2Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
  3. 3Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Abstract

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) comprises multiple histopathological subtypes with distinct biological characteristics and clinical behavior. Despite advances in conventional imaging, the detection of small RCC lesions or distant metastases remains challenging and the prognosis of advanced RCC is still poor. Theranostic approaches are promising tools combining diagnostic imaging and targeted radionuclide-based cancer therapy. The identification of suitable molecular targets in tumor tissue is a major focus of current research. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-MET) have been proposed as theranostic targets in several solid cancers, including RCC. However, available data are limited and inconsistent, particularly regarding expression patterns across different RCC subtypes. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the expression patterns of FAP and c-MET immunohistochemically across major RCC subtypes (clear cell RCC [ccRCC], papillary RCC [pRCC], and chromophobe RCC [cpRCC]). Staining intensity was assessed semi-quantitatively and correlated with histological RCC subtypes. Results: FAP expression differed substantially among RCC subtypes, being highest in ccRCC, significantly lower in pRCC, and largely absent in cpRCC. In contrast, c-MET was ubiquitously expressed across all three RCC subtypes but showed a lower specificity for tumor cells. Conclusions: Our results provide a rationale for further evaluating FAP and c-MET as potential theranostic targets across RCC subtypes and establishing a foundation for future RCC-subtype-specific imaging-pathology correlation studies. Validation in larger multicenter cohorts including paired molecular imaging data is required before their clinical translation can be considered.

Related

  1. PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Paired Immunohistochemical Study
    Harald Bagger-Jörgensen, Christian Thomsen, Klas Sjöberg
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Immunohistochemical Expression of M30, BCL-2, BAX, and Ki-67 in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Association with Clinicopathological Features
    Betül Demirciler Yavaş, Sezgin Yılmaz
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. VEGF-A Immunohistochemical Expression Across Appendiceal Epithelial Lesions: A Retrospective Exploratory Study
    Ante Tavra, Marina Ćaleta Rade, Toni Čeprnja +6
    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Prognostic Significance of p53 Immunohistochemical Expression and Molecular Characterization of TP53 Variants in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Juan Ramón Berenguer-Marí, Luis Álvarez, Julia Sierra-Roca +8
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Immunohistochemical Expression of RhoJ Protein in Breast Carcinoma
    Xavier Catteau, Manon Charry, Justine Allard +3
    Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular MorphologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{unterrainer2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative Immunohistochemical Analysis of FAP and c-MET Expression Across Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes: Preliminary Results and Potential Theranostic Implications.}},
  author = {Lena M Unterrainer and Adrien Holzgreve and Sophie C Siegmund and Magdalena Schöll and Julia Schwenke and Rudolf A Werner and Frederick Klauschen and Michael Staehler and Stephan T Ledderose},
  journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16193228},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882383},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Immunohistochemical Analysis of FAP and c-MET Expression Across Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes: Preliminary Results and Potential Theranostic Implications.
AU  - Lena M Unterrainer
AU  - Adrien Holzgreve
AU  - Sophie C Siegmund
AU  - Magdalena Schöll
AU  - Julia Schwenke
AU  - Rudolf A Werner
AU  - Frederick Klauschen
AU  - Michael Staehler
AU  - Stephan T Ledderose
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/diagnostics16193228
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882383
AB  - Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) comprises multiple histopathological subtypes with distinct biological characteristics and clinical behavior. Despite advances in conventional imaging, the detection of small RCC lesions or distant metastases remains challenging and the prognosis of advanced RCC is still poor. Theranostic approaches are promising tools combining diagnostic imaging and targeted radionuclide-based cancer therapy. The identification of suitable molecular targets in tumor tissue is a major focus of current research. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-MET) have been proposed as theranostic targets in several solid cancers, including RCC. However, available data are limited and inconsistent, particularly regarding expression patterns across different RCC subtypes. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the expression patterns of FAP and c-MET immunohistochemically across major RCC subtypes (clear cell RCC [ccRCC], papillary RCC [pRCC], and chromophobe RCC [cpRCC]). Staining intensity was assessed semi-quantitatively and correlated with histological RCC subtypes. Results: FAP expression differed substantially among RCC subtypes, being highest in ccRCC, significantly lower in pRCC, and largely absent in cpRCC. In contrast, c-MET was ubiquitously expressed across all three RCC subtypes but showed a lower specificity for tumor cells. Conclusions: Our results provide a rationale for further evaluating FAP and c-MET as potential theranostic targets across RCC subtypes and establishing a foundation for future RCC-subtype-specific imaging-pathology correlation studies. Validation in larger multicenter cohorts including paired molecular imaging data is required before their clinical translation can be considered.
SN  - 2075-4418
ER  -