Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Collective Empathy in Politics and Public Policy: Toward a Scaffolding Framework

  1. 1Reichman University
  2. 2University of Southern Denmark
  3. 3Deakin University

Abstract

Empathy is invoked as a response to conflict and social fragmentation, yet political and public policy research has largely treated it as an individual or interpersonal phenomenon. This article develops a process-oriented account of collective empathy as a socially and politically mediated phenomenon through which empathy towards others becomes collectively shared, publicly reinforced, institutionally mediated, and politically consequential. We propose a scaffolding framework comprising three interacting mechanisms: bottom-up activation and aggregation, horizontal diffusion, and top-down legitimation. We argue that the configuration and interaction of these mechanisms shape the durability of collective empathy: mutual reinforcement facilitates stabilization, whereas limited reinforcement or conflict among these mechanisms produces episodic or fragmented trajectories. Structured empirical illustrations from refugee politics, post-conflict reconciliation, and the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrate the framework’s empirical plausibility. The framework explains why intense empathic responses may remain temporary while more modest orientations can become durable through communicative and institutional reinforcement.

Related

  1. Purpose, Pretext and Politics: Public Purpose, Discrimination and Motive in the Law of Expropriation
    S.S. Bukhari
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  2. Investigation on public stigma and empathy ability of undergraduate nursing students towards schizophrenia
    Luyu Zhang, Xueqin Zhang, Zhenling Lu
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Multidimensional evaluation of generative AI chatbots for public consultation on sudden cardiac death: safety, accuracy, empathy, reliability, quality, and readability across six models
    Youyou Chen, Hui Ma, Huimin Wang +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Intelligent educational agent-based collaborative scaffolding for STEM interdisciplinary project-based learning: a multi-dimensional framework and empirical evaluation
    Jingjing Zang
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCrossref
  5. Beyond single scaffolding: a multidimensional scaffolding framework for flow-driven Game-Based Learning.
    Huei-Tse Hou
    Frontiers in psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{maor2026collective,
  title = {{Collective Empathy in Politics and Public Policy: Toward a Scaffolding Framework}},
  author = {Moshe Maor and Peter Starke and Claire Yorke},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23589980},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23589980},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Collective Empathy in Politics and Public Policy: Toward a Scaffolding Framework
AU  - Moshe Maor
AU  - Peter Starke
AU  - Claire Yorke
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23589980
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23589980
AB  - Empathy is invoked as a response to conflict and social fragmentation, yet political and public policy research has largely treated it as an individual or interpersonal phenomenon. This article develops a process-oriented account of collective empathy as a socially and politically mediated phenomenon through which empathy towards others becomes collectively shared, publicly reinforced, institutionally mediated, and politically consequential. We propose a scaffolding framework comprising three interacting mechanisms: bottom-up activation and aggregation, horizontal diffusion, and top-down legitimation. We argue that the configuration and interaction of these mechanisms shape the durability of collective empathy: mutual reinforcement facilitates stabilization, whereas limited reinforcement or conflict among these mechanisms produces episodic or fragmented trajectories. Structured empirical illustrations from refugee politics, post-conflict reconciliation, and the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrate the framework’s empirical plausibility. The framework explains why intense empathic responses may remain temporary while more modest orientations can become durable through communicative and institutional reinforcement.
ER  -