Dual-Process Integrated AI Safety and Dialogue Architecture: An Exploratory Framework for Contextual Risk Assessment, Controlled Output, User-Interest Inference, and Proactive Interaction
- 1Independent Researcher
Abstract
This study proposes an exploratory computational architecture for investigating AI safety and proactive dialogue. Its central theme is the integration of three components: safety-first response generation, the potential parallelization of generation and safety assessment, and interest-guided proactive dialogue.
First, the framework proposes temporarily buffering generated responses and evaluating their contextual consistency and potential safety risks before authorizing external release. Second, it explores the possibility of overlapping response generation and safety assessment in time, with the aim of investigating the relationship between safety review and computational efficiency. Third, it proposes inferring conversational interests from previously authorized and transmitted dialogue and using these estimates to inform subsequent responses and proactive questions. Every newly generated response remains subject to safety assessment, and explicit user instructions take precedence over inferred interests.
The methodology focuses on separating and coordinating computational processes, structuring response-release authorization, estimating and updating conversational interest weights, and defining empirical evaluation criteria for safety, response quality, latency, computational cost, and the usefulness of proactive questions.
This work presents an exploratory conceptual framework and does not claim that the proposed architecture or its potential benefits have been empirically validated. The practical efficiency of parallel processing, the reliability of safety assessment, the accuracy of interest inference, and the appropriateness of proactive questions remain open research questions requiring further theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation
Related
- Contextual Biomedical Language Models for Imbalance-Aware Drug-Food Interaction Classification
- Smartphone-Native Bidirectional Pain-Related Multimodal Large Language Models: A Unified Framework for Pain Sensing, Contextual Reasoning, Safe Sensory Feedback, and Adaptive Interaction
- Contextual assessment of perceived health system alignment with National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care in the American Southeast
- Mirror Architecture And The Universal Data Pattern: A Measured Cross-Disciplinary State Architecture From AI Interaction Through Formal Systems, Matter, Solar Mechanics, Biology, And The Return Into AI
- VOC·BIO Library: An Integrated Platform for Published Aphid GC-MS Evidence, Biological Contexts, Cheminformatics and Exploratory OBP Docking
BibTeX
@misc{lee2026dualprocess,
title = {{Dual-Process Integrated AI Safety and Dialogue Architecture: An Exploratory Framework for Contextual Risk Assessment, Controlled Output, User-Interest Inference, and Proactive Interaction}},
author = {Sungmin Lee},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23636099},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23636099},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Dual-Process Integrated AI Safety and Dialogue Architecture: An Exploratory Framework for Contextual Risk Assessment, Controlled Output, User-Interest Inference, and Proactive Interaction
AU - Sungmin Lee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23636099
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23636099
AB - This study proposes an exploratory computational architecture for investigating AI safety and proactive dialogue. Its central theme is the integration of three components: safety-first response generation, the potential parallelization of generation and safety assessment, and interest-guided proactive dialogue. First, the framework proposes temporarily buffering generated responses and evaluating their contextual consistency and potential safety risks before authorizing external release. Second, it explores the possibility of overlapping response generation and safety assessment in time, with the aim of investigating the relationship between safety review and computational efficiency. Third, it proposes inferring conversational interests from previously authorized and transmitted dialogue and using these estimates to inform subsequent responses and proactive questions. Every newly generated response remains subject to safety assessment, and explicit user instructions take precedence over inferred interests. The methodology focuses on separating and coordinating computational processes, structuring response-release authorization, estimating and updating conversational interest weights, and defining empirical evaluation criteria for safety, response quality, latency, computational cost, and the usefulness of proactive questions. This work presents an exploratory conceptual framework and does not claim that the proposed architecture or its potential benefits have been empirically validated. The practical efficiency of parallel processing, the reliability of safety assessment, the accuracy of interest inference, and the appropriateness of proactive questions remain open research questions requiring further theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation
ER -