Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NDmedRxiv

AI-Based MRI Radiomics for Preoperative Detection of Tumor Deposits in Rectal Cancer: A Bivariate Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-analysis

  1. 1Associate Professor of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Abstract

Background: In rectal cancer (RC), tumor deposits (TDs) are clinically important as they are associated with a negative impact on prognosis and affect risk stratification as well as management plans. MRI radiomics combined with artificial intelligence (AI) has been explored for non-invasive preoperative TDs detection. However, results vary across studies; therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to pool their diagnostic test accuracy (DTA). Methods: This systematic review and DTA meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and reported in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA). Databases were screened for DTA studies of MRI-based radiomics predicting TDs in adult RC patients with histopathology as reference. Results: Nine studies (2589 patients) were identified. Across included studies, the bivariate meta-analysis showed pooled sensitivity of 0.765 (95% CI 0.714 - 0.809) and specificity of 0.790 (95% CI 0.750 - 0.825), with overall AUC of 0.845 and very low heterogeneity (I2 = 7.3%). In validation datasets, diagnostic performance remained consistent (AUC 0.806), with pooled sensitivity 0.751 (95% CI 0.681 - 0.809) and specificity 0.751 (95% CI 0.681 - 0.809). For MRI modality, T2 weighted image (T2WI) showed higher sensitivity (0.745) than T2WI plus diffusion weighted image (DWI) (0.697), while T2WI+DWI had higher specificity (0.809 vs 0.737) and AUC (0.829 vs 0.796), with no significant subgroup differences (p[≥]0.192). Models combining radiomics with clinical/radiological variables achieved significantly higher sensitivity (0.842 vs 0.657, p<0.001) and higher AUC (0.827 vs 0.752), with comparable specificity. Conclusion: MRI-based radiomics demonstrates good accuracy for preoperative detection of tumor deposits in RC. The integration of radiomics with clinical or imaging features increases the accuracy of identification. Amongst the MRI modalities, models that utilize the combination of T2WI plus DWI are more accurate than those using T2WI or DWI only.

Related

  1. Multimodal preoperative risk stratification of pancreatic mass lesions using clinical variables, imaging radiomics and plasma cfDNA methylation: protocol for an ambispective multicentre diagnostic prediction model study
    Ziru Xue, Wenning Jia, Xiaoling Weng +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossrefPMC
  2. CT-based multi-station lymph-node radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a proof-of-concept comparison with primary-tumor radiomics
    Zejin Lin, Jue Wang, Hairong Chen +6
    European radiology experimentalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  3. Habitat-based ultrasound radiomics for preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a two-center study
    Zimeng Fang, Xiaoyu Yan, Yunyun Zhan +6
    Gland SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Nodule subtype dependency of CT-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of spread through air spaces in stage I lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-centre study
    Meirong Li, Yachao Ruan, Yunfei Sheng +4
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  5. MRI-derived habitat radiomics integrated with transformer deep learning for preoperative prediction of high CD9 expression: a novel prognostic marker in adult-type diffuse gliomas
    Bingxin Pang, Mengyuan Yuan, Ying Yan +5
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{alsaied2026aibased,
  title = {{AI-Based MRI Radiomics for Preoperative Detection of Tumor Deposits in Rectal Cancer: A Bivariate Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-analysis}},
  author = {M. A. Alsaied and M. Hegazy and M. M. Saleh and B. Barakat and O. R. Ibrahim and H. M. Abdelrazek and S. Nazemi and A. El-Hussuna and M. Shalaby},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.02.26367109},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.02.26367109v1},
  note = {CC BY-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - AI-Based MRI Radiomics for Preoperative Detection of Tumor Deposits in Rectal Cancer: A Bivariate Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-analysis
AU  - M. A. Alsaied
AU  - M. Hegazy
AU  - M. M. Saleh
AU  - B. Barakat
AU  - O. R. Ibrahim
AU  - H. M. Abdelrazek
AU  - S. Nazemi
AU  - A. El-Hussuna
AU  - M. Shalaby
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.02.26367109
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.02.26367109v1
AB  - Background: In rectal cancer (RC), tumor deposits (TDs) are clinically important as they are associated with a negative impact on prognosis and affect risk stratification as well as management plans. MRI radiomics combined with artificial intelligence (AI) has been explored for non-invasive preoperative TDs detection. However, results vary across studies; therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to pool their diagnostic test accuracy (DTA). Methods: This systematic review and DTA meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and reported in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA). Databases were screened for DTA studies of MRI-based radiomics predicting TDs in adult RC patients with histopathology as reference. Results: Nine studies (2589 patients) were identified. Across included studies, the bivariate meta-analysis showed pooled sensitivity of 0.765 (95% CI 0.714 - 0.809) and specificity of 0.790 (95% CI 0.750 - 0.825), with overall AUC of 0.845 and very low heterogeneity (I2 = 7.3%). In validation datasets, diagnostic performance remained consistent (AUC 0.806), with pooled sensitivity 0.751 (95% CI 0.681 - 0.809) and specificity 0.751 (95% CI 0.681 - 0.809). For MRI modality, T2 weighted image (T2WI) showed higher sensitivity (0.745) than T2WI plus diffusion weighted image (DWI) (0.697), while T2WI+DWI had higher specificity (0.809 vs 0.737) and AUC (0.829 vs 0.796), with no significant subgroup differences (p[≥]0.192). Models combining radiomics with clinical/radiological variables achieved significantly higher sensitivity (0.842 vs 0.657, p<0.001) and higher AUC (0.827 vs 0.752), with comparable specificity. Conclusion: MRI-based radiomics demonstrates good accuracy for preoperative detection of tumor deposits in RC. The integration of radiomics with clinical or imaging features increases the accuracy of identification. Amongst the MRI modalities, models that utilize the combination of T2WI plus DWI are more accurate than those using T2WI or DWI only.
ER  -