Long-Term Speech Outcomes After Primary Palatoplasty: A Comparison of Minimal-Incision Intravelar and Modified Veau–Wardill–Kilner Techniques
- 1Section of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery and Thermal Trauma, Department of Propedeutics of Surgical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv “St. George” University Hospital Plovdiv, Peshtersko Shausse Blvd 66, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- 2Department of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv “St. George” University Hospital Plovdiv, Vassil Aprilov Blvd 15A, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Speech outcome is a major functional endpoint following primary palatoplasty. This study compared long-term speech outcomes after closed intravelar minimal-incision palatoplasty and the modified Veau–Wardill–Kilner procedure. Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated speech using a standardized perceptual protocol adapted to the Bulgarian phonetic system across eight domains. Outcomes were compared between surgical groups, with additional analyses stratified by age and cleft type. Results: The minimal-incision group showed higher unadjusted proportions of normal speech intelligibility (29.4% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.020), normal resonance (73.2% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.001), and normal consonant articulation (37.8% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001), whereas compensatory articulation was less frequent (49.6% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.008). Hypernasality, voice quality, and vowel articulation were comparable between groups. After adjustment for cleft type and age group, no significant association was observed between surgical technique and normal speech intelligibility (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.73–2.43; p = 0.357), whereas the minimal-incision technique was associated with higher odds of normal consonant articulation (aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.01–3.18; p = 0.047) and normal resonance (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02–2.94; p = 0.043). Conclusions: Both techniques were associated with broadly comparable long-term functional speech outcomes across most evaluated domains. After adjustment for cleft type and age group, differences remained in normal consonant articulation and normal resonance, whereas no significant adjusted association was observed for normal speech intelligibility. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the historical treatment patterns, non-random distribution of cleft type between groups, and potential residual confounding.
Related
- Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Small Extracellular Vesicles from Drosophila Larval Hemolymph
- Comparison of bone augmentation techniques in the mandibular posterior region: A randomized clinical trial protocol
- Ventricular lavage (VeLa) for ventriculitis: A systematic review of techniques and meta-analysis of outcomes.
- Neonatal surgical injury alters social behaviour and cortical network responses to adult incision
- A Case of Refractory Pouchitis with Postoperative Anal Stenosis after Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Treated with Vedolizumab, a Radial Incision and Cutting
BibTeX
@article{gigov2026longterm,
title = {{Long-Term Speech Outcomes After Primary Palatoplasty: A Comparison of Minimal-Incision Intravelar and Modified Veau–Wardill–Kilner Techniques}},
author = {Kostadin Gigov and Ivan Ginev and Petra Kavradzhieva and Mariya Miteva},
journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15197727},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13665868},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Long-Term Speech Outcomes After Primary Palatoplasty: A Comparison of Minimal-Incision Intravelar and Modified Veau–Wardill–Kilner Techniques
AU - Kostadin Gigov
AU - Ivan Ginev
AU - Petra Kavradzhieva
AU - Mariya Miteva
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Journal of clinical medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15197727
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13665868
AB - Background/Objectives: Speech outcome is a major functional endpoint following primary palatoplasty. This study compared long-term speech outcomes after closed intravelar minimal-incision palatoplasty and the modified Veau–Wardill–Kilner procedure. Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated speech using a standardized perceptual protocol adapted to the Bulgarian phonetic system across eight domains. Outcomes were compared between surgical groups, with additional analyses stratified by age and cleft type. Results: The minimal-incision group showed higher unadjusted proportions of normal speech intelligibility (29.4% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.020), normal resonance (73.2% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.001), and normal consonant articulation (37.8% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001), whereas compensatory articulation was less frequent (49.6% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.008). Hypernasality, voice quality, and vowel articulation were comparable between groups. After adjustment for cleft type and age group, no significant association was observed between surgical technique and normal speech intelligibility (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.73–2.43; p = 0.357), whereas the minimal-incision technique was associated with higher odds of normal consonant articulation (aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.01–3.18; p = 0.047) and normal resonance (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02–2.94; p = 0.043). Conclusions: Both techniques were associated with broadly comparable long-term functional speech outcomes across most evaluated domains. After adjustment for cleft type and age group, differences remained in normal consonant articulation and normal resonance, whereas no significant adjusted association was observed for normal speech intelligibility. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the historical treatment patterns, non-random distribution of cleft type between groups, and potential residual confounding.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -