Operational Challenges During Public Health Emergencies in Safety-Net Hospitals
6 affiliations
- 1Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, Baltimore, Maryland
- 2Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- 3Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts
- 4Now with Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora
- 5Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- 6Department of Emergency Medicine, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract
Importance: Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) serve as essential public health hubs, providing direct clinical care and critical social services to vulnerable populations, yet gaps persist in their ability to reliably deliver these essential services during disasters.
Objective: To identify common challenges faced by SNHs and actionable approaches described by participants to strengthen future emergency response capacity at these critical institutions.
Design, Setting, and Participants: For this qualitative study, from April through November 2025, key informant interviews were conducted with individuals across SNHs selected to represent a spectrum of SNH types. Thematic analysis of site-level case studies was used to identify cross-cutting and context-specific patterns across 5 domains: load balancing, staffing needs, supply chain, crisis standards of care (CSC), and health care coalitions (HCCs).
Main Outcomes and Measures: Stakeholder perspectives of pandemic preparedness, response, and recovery were evaluated to understand strategies to mitigate future health care disasters.
Results: Analysis of interviews with 69 individuals from 10 SNH sites identified systemic vulnerabilities across all 5 domains in SNHs. SNHs rarely succeeded in transferring critically ill patients without extensive staff time spent setting up the transfer. SNHs often experienced severe workforce disruptions from limited staff pools and nurse attrition, leaving them dependent on temporary staff at higher costs. Just-in-time personal protective equipment procurement and constricted manufacturing supply chains created supply crises. Few SNHs implemented full CSC, but many worked to find creative solutions to prevent more extensive changes in care standards. Opinions on written CSC were mixed, with some preferring structured frameworks and others preferring flexibility. Experiences with HCCs varied widely, with SNHs embedded in well-resourced HCCs reporting better coordination and support.
Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of SNH preparedness and response, findings indicated that SNHs faced challenges with load balancing, supply chain, staffing, CSC, and HCCs. To address such challenges in the future, SNHs, regional coalitions, and the federal government should implement sustainable changes that can be rapidly brought to bear in an emergency. Potential solutions may have outsized benefit for SNHs; however, such solutions must be designed to be accessible to SNHs and feasible in these settings.
Related
- Incidence and risk factors of hyperglycemic emergencies in adults with diabetes in the public hospitals in Harari region, Eastern Ethiopia
- Operationalising the Operational Guidance on Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies: A Narrative Review of Implementation Strategies, Barriers, Facilitators, and Health System Integration in Humanitarian Settings
- Editorial: Public health challenges in post-Soviet countries during and beyond COVID-19, volume II
- Abdominal circumference and its relationship with the incidence of hypotension during elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia at public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2024.
- Simulation-Based Outreach Program to Support Community Hospitals’ Team Readiness for Obstetric Emergencies Across a Rural Health System
BibTeX
@article{sell2026operational,
title = {{Operational Challenges During Public Health Emergencies in Safety-Net Hospitals}},
author = {Tara Kirk Sell and Vanessa Grégoire and Madisen S. Neufeld and Rachel R. Adler and Geoffrey Gosselin and Alysa Pomer and Biak L. Tial and Joel S. Weissman and Eric Goralnick},
journal = {JAMA Network Open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.40799},
url = {https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2855862},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Operational Challenges During Public Health Emergencies in Safety-Net Hospitals
AU - Tara Kirk Sell
AU - Vanessa Grégoire
AU - Madisen S. Neufeld
AU - Rachel R. Adler
AU - Geoffrey Gosselin
AU - Alysa Pomer
AU - Biak L. Tial
AU - Joel S. Weissman
AU - Eric Goralnick
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - JAMA Network Open
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.40799
UR - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2855862
AB - Importance: Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) serve as essential public health hubs, providing direct clinical care and critical social services to vulnerable populations, yet gaps persist in their ability to reliably deliver these essential services during disasters. Objective: To identify common challenges faced by SNHs and actionable approaches described by participants to strengthen future emergency response capacity at these critical institutions. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this qualitative study, from April through November 2025, key informant interviews were conducted with individuals across SNHs selected to represent a spectrum of SNH types. Thematic analysis of site-level case studies was used to identify cross-cutting and context-specific patterns across 5 domains: load balancing, staffing needs, supply chain, crisis standards of care (CSC), and health care coalitions (HCCs). Main Outcomes and Measures: Stakeholder perspectives of pandemic preparedness, response, and recovery were evaluated to understand strategies to mitigate future health care disasters. Results: Analysis of interviews with 69 individuals from 10 SNH sites identified systemic vulnerabilities across all 5 domains in SNHs. SNHs rarely succeeded in transferring critically ill patients without extensive staff time spent setting up the transfer. SNHs often experienced severe workforce disruptions from limited staff pools and nurse attrition, leaving them dependent on temporary staff at higher costs. Just-in-time personal protective equipment procurement and constricted manufacturing supply chains created supply crises. Few SNHs implemented full CSC, but many worked to find creative solutions to prevent more extensive changes in care standards. Opinions on written CSC were mixed, with some preferring structured frameworks and others preferring flexibility. Experiences with HCCs varied widely, with SNHs embedded in well-resourced HCCs reporting better coordination and support. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of SNH preparedness and response, findings indicated that SNHs faced challenges with load balancing, supply chain, staffing, CSC, and HCCs. To address such challenges in the future, SNHs, regional coalitions, and the federal government should implement sustainable changes that can be rapidly brought to bear in an emergency. Potential solutions may have outsized benefit for SNHs; however, such solutions must be designed to be accessible to SNHs and feasible in these settings.
SN - 2574-3805
ER -