Navigating Suicide-Related Online Content in Individuals With Lived Experience of Suicidality: Cross-Sectional Survey.
5 affiliations
- 1Middlesex University, London, England, United Kingdom.
- 2Samaritans, London, United Kingdom.
- 3University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, England, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
- 4Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
- 5Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Background
Engagement with suicide-related content online is often assumed to be harmful, yet many individuals with lived experience describe such content as supportive or even life-preserving. Despite policy and clinical concerns, little is known about how people intentionally or unintentionally encounter this content, how they interpret it, and how these experiences shape perceived harm or benefit.Objective
This study aims to explore how intent and context influence the ways in which individuals with lived experience of suicidality encounter, interpret, and respond to suicide-related online content, and to identify factors associated with perceived harm and benefit.Methods
An exploratory cross-sectional survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 713 UK-based participants aged 16 to 60 years and older, 95.9% (n=684) of whom reported having lived experience of suicidality. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including chi-square tests, to examine associations between engagement patterns, intent, and suicidality. Free-text responses were coded using content analysis to identify categories relating to motivations for engagement, emotional responses, and perceived impact.Results
Participants reported a broad range of experiences. While 30.0% (214/713) described suicide-related content as contributing to suicidal thoughts or attempts, others reported relief, validation, or reduced feelings of isolation, with 21.0% (150/713) attributing content to preventing an attempt. Clear differences emerged between participants who actively sought out content ("seekers") and those who encountered it unintentionally ("stumblers"). Seekers more frequently reported positive or understanding responses, often in the context of unmet offline support needs, whereas stumblers were more likely to report shock or distress. Approximately 39.9% (151/378) of participants described their engagement as neither intentional nor accidental, potentially reflecting a blurred boundary between passive exposure and active seeking, as well as the difficulty individuals face in accurately identifying and articulating their own motivations in relation to suicidality.Conclusions
Engagement with suicide-related online content cannot be characterized as uniformly harmful. Outcomes depend on user intent, emotional state, and the context of engagement, and they may change over time. Clinical, regulatory, and policy approaches should move beyond risk-only frameworks to account for the nuanced and sometimes supportive roles such content plays in how individuals make sense of suicidal thoughts, while still protecting those at risk.
Related
- Risk and protective factors for suicidality in older adults: an umbrella review and framework for multidimensional suicide risk assessment
- Suicide attempt risk in autism: a national EHR study of 2.3 million individuals
- Low-threshold secondary and tertiary suicide prevention measures for individuals with suicid-related thoughts and behaviors: a scoping review
- Spatial patterns and factors associated with suicide death among individuals with suicide attempts in northern Iran
- Response to Letter to the Editor: “Individuals Over 75-Year-Old Experience Greater Revisions Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): A Propensity Matched Study”
BibTeX
@article{greaves2026navigating,
title = {{Navigating Suicide-Related Online Content in Individuals With Lived Experience of Suicidality: Cross-Sectional Survey.}},
author = {Jacob Greaves and Dafni Katsampa and Lydia Grace and Ciara Harris and Anna Lavis and Ian Marsh and Lisa Marzano},
journal = {Journal of medical Internet research},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2196/92693},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904875},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Navigating Suicide-Related Online Content in Individuals With Lived Experience of Suicidality: Cross-Sectional Survey.
AU - Jacob Greaves
AU - Dafni Katsampa
AU - Lydia Grace
AU - Ciara Harris
AU - Anna Lavis
AU - Ian Marsh
AU - Lisa Marzano
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
JO - Journal of medical Internet research
DO - 10.2196/92693
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904875
AB - Background Engagement with suicide-related content online is often assumed to be harmful, yet many individuals with lived experience describe such content as supportive or even life-preserving. Despite policy and clinical concerns, little is known about how people intentionally or unintentionally encounter this content, how they interpret it, and how these experiences shape perceived harm or benefit.Objective This study aims to explore how intent and context influence the ways in which individuals with lived experience of suicidality encounter, interpret, and respond to suicide-related online content, and to identify factors associated with perceived harm and benefit.Methods An exploratory cross-sectional survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 713 UK-based participants aged 16 to 60 years and older, 95.9% (n=684) of whom reported having lived experience of suicidality. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including chi-square tests, to examine associations between engagement patterns, intent, and suicidality. Free-text responses were coded using content analysis to identify categories relating to motivations for engagement, emotional responses, and perceived impact.Results Participants reported a broad range of experiences. While 30.0% (214/713) described suicide-related content as contributing to suicidal thoughts or attempts, others reported relief, validation, or reduced feelings of isolation, with 21.0% (150/713) attributing content to preventing an attempt. Clear differences emerged between participants who actively sought out content ("seekers") and those who encountered it unintentionally ("stumblers"). Seekers more frequently reported positive or understanding responses, often in the context of unmet offline support needs, whereas stumblers were more likely to report shock or distress. Approximately 39.9% (151/378) of participants described their engagement as neither intentional nor accidental, potentially reflecting a blurred boundary between passive exposure and active seeking, as well as the difficulty individuals face in accurately identifying and articulating their own motivations in relation to suicidality.Conclusions Engagement with suicide-related online content cannot be characterized as uniformly harmful. Outcomes depend on user intent, emotional state, and the context of engagement, and they may change over time. Clinical, regulatory, and policy approaches should move beyond risk-only frameworks to account for the nuanced and sometimes supportive roles such content plays in how individuals make sense of suicidal thoughts, while still protecting those at risk.
SN - 1439-4456
SN - 1438-8871
ER -