Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0HAL

Identifying hidden nuclear material in orbit from its own neutron spectrum

Abstract

The Outer Space Treaty bans nuclear weapons from orbit but lacks a dedicated means of verifying what a closed spacecraft contains. The orbital environment supplies a natural interrogation field: trapped protons induce neutron emission, allowing passive inspection without an active source. Detection can flag an anomalous object from kilometre standoff, but a count does not determine composition. Here we construct a conventional aluminium spacecraft and a uranium-bearing object with nearly identical detector-accepted neutron counts, whose reconstructed spectra remain distinct. In the baseline geometry the full spectrum reaches an area under the receiver-operating characteristic of 0.90 after about 70 accepted neutrons. A tungsten configuration matched to the uranium count rate preserves only about 2.2 per cent of the per-neutron spectral separation, raising the requirement to about 3200 neutrons for discrimination and 8200 for 90 per cent power at 5 per cent false attribution against that alternative. Under a published detector-rate benchmark, ten inspectors at 500 m require about one week for discrimination and less than three weeks for controlled attribution. These thresholds define an inspection claim envelope: detection, discrimination and attribution are distinct measurements with distinct range-dwell regimes. The environment supplies the interrogation; proximity determines what may responsibly be claimed.

Related

  1. Black hole-neutron star binaries with high spins and large mass asymmetries: III. Properties of the ejected material and its electromagnetic signatures
    Konrad Topolski, Samuel D. Tootle, Paramvir Singh +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  2. Neutron disappearance and the LZ nuclear recoil event
    Mohammad Aghaie, Алессандро Струмиа
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull text22 citedHigh-energy & particle physicsarXivOpenAlex
  3. DM induced neutron disappearance as the origin of the LZ nuclear recoil event
    P. Uttayarat, J. Julio, R. Primulando
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Revised analysis of the strengths of the contact potential at N4LO through nuclear and neutron matter
    Francesca Sammarruca, Tomiwa Ajagbonna
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNuclear physicsarXiv
  5. Statistical Analysis of Neutron Star Cooling: Implications for the Nuclear Equation of State and Nucleon Pairing
    Afonso Ávila, Ricardo Z. Ferreira, Violetta Sagun
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{maghrbi2026identifying,
  title = {{Identifying hidden nuclear material in orbit from its own neutron spectrum}},
  author = {Yasser Maghrbi},
  howpublished = {HAL},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05713434v2},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Identifying hidden nuclear material in orbit from its own neutron spectrum
AU  - Yasser Maghrbi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
PB  - HAL
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05713434v2
AB  - The Outer Space Treaty bans nuclear weapons from orbit but lacks a dedicated means of verifying what a closed spacecraft contains. The orbital environment supplies a natural interrogation field: trapped protons induce neutron emission, allowing passive inspection without an active source. Detection can flag an anomalous object from kilometre standoff, but a count does not determine composition. Here we construct a conventional aluminium spacecraft and a uranium-bearing object with nearly identical detector-accepted neutron counts, whose reconstructed spectra remain distinct. In the baseline geometry the full spectrum reaches an area under the receiver-operating characteristic of 0.90 after about 70 accepted neutrons. A tungsten configuration matched to the uranium count rate preserves only about 2.2 per cent of the per-neutron spectral separation, raising the requirement to about 3200 neutrons for discrimination and 8200 for 90 per cent power at 5 per cent false attribution against that alternative. Under a published detector-rate benchmark, ten inspectors at 500 m require about one week for discrimination and less than three weeks for controlled attribution. These thresholds define an inspection claim envelope: detection, discrimination and attribution are distinct measurements with distinct range-dwell regimes. The environment supplies the interrogation; proximity determines what may responsibly be claimed.
ER  -