Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Real-time reorienting during episodic retrieval rescues memories from suboptimal arousal-attentional states

  1. 1Stanford University

Abstract

Successful knowledge expression varies with one's arousal-attentional (A-A) state at the moment just prior to attempting to remember. Yet, whether such states causally affect retrieval remains unclear. Here we introduce PRISM (Pupil-based Real-time Intervention System for Memory), a closed-loop paradigm that continuously monitors pupil size to track A-A states in real time and, during suboptimal states (SOS), delivers a visual reorienting cue in the moment before a retrieval attempt. In 67 participants performing a goal-directed source memory and item recognition task, we show that pupil-defined SOS just prior to retrieval impair both item recognition and source recollection relative to optimal state (OS) trials. Critically, delivering a brief visual reorienting trigger cue on SOS trials in real time rescues item memory, but not source memory, raising item memory to a level not credibly different from real-time OS trials and providing causal evidence that phasic attentional reorienting during A-A-defined suboptimal states facilitates memory access at retrieval. Offline spline-detrending analysis confirms that the A-A state-memory relationship is robust to slow physiological drift. It also shows that the trigger benefit was credible for marginally suboptimal (drift-driven) SOS trials and smaller and less certain for deeply suboptimal (drift-resistant) SOS trials, consistent with a zone-of-recoverability account, although the difference between the two SOS subtypes was not credible. Furthermore, among deeply suboptimal trials the A-A-boosting trigger cue improved memory for low-A-A SOS (i.e., pupillary constriction) but not high-A-A SOS (i.e., pupillary dilation) trials, consistent with the classic inverted-U relationship between arousal and performance, although the difference between the two directions was not credible. Together, these findings causally link phasic arousal-attentional reorienting at retrieval to memory rescue and suggest that the depth and direction of suboptimality shape whether such rescue succeeds, connecting the readiness-to-remember framework to the classic arousal-performance inverted-U relationship. Moreover, these findings provide a further foundation for adaptive closed-loop technologies that would tailor intervention to the depth and direction of momentary arousal-attentional states, facilitating memory expression in real time.

Related

  1. Lifespan accumulated differences in semantic memory structure contribute to increases in episodic false memories
    Sarah Henderson, Ryan McCurdy, Anika Bhatia +3
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  2. Retrieval uncertainty drives rapid consolidation of confabulated memories in retrosplenial cortex
    A. Singh, N. Das, P. Ahuja +7
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Related memories exhibit interference during learning in adults but later retrieval in children
    Merron Woodbury, Chunan Duan, Eryk Brol +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePLOS
  4. Episodic memory adaptively expands retrieval through typicality-guided transformation while concrete details remain accessible
    M. Delmarco, C. Gonzalez-Garcia, J. Linde-Domingo
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Suboptimal human inference reflects an efficient and flexible information bottleneck
    J. A. Parker, A. L. S. Filipowicz, K. Li +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{schwartz2026realtime,
  title = {{Real-time reorienting during episodic retrieval rescues memories from suboptimal arousal-attentional states}},
  author = {S. T. Schwartz and H. Yang and M. He and K. K. Nguyen and M. T. deBettencourt and T. T. Tran and K. P. Madore and A. D. Wagner},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.28.762693},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.28.762693v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Real-time reorienting during episodic retrieval rescues memories from suboptimal arousal-attentional states
AU  - S. T. Schwartz
AU  - H. Yang
AU  - M. He
AU  - K. K. Nguyen
AU  - M. T. deBettencourt
AU  - T. T. Tran
AU  - K. P. Madore
AU  - A. D. Wagner
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.28.762693
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.28.762693v1
AB  - Successful knowledge expression varies with one's arousal-attentional (A-A) state at the moment just prior to attempting to remember. Yet, whether such states causally affect retrieval remains unclear. Here we introduce PRISM (Pupil-based Real-time Intervention System for Memory), a closed-loop paradigm that continuously monitors pupil size to track A-A states in real time and, during suboptimal states (SOS), delivers a visual reorienting cue in the moment before a retrieval attempt. In 67 participants performing a goal-directed source memory and item recognition task, we show that pupil-defined SOS just prior to retrieval impair both item recognition and source recollection relative to optimal state (OS) trials. Critically, delivering a brief visual reorienting trigger cue on SOS trials in real time rescues item memory, but not source memory, raising item memory to a level not credibly different from real-time OS trials and providing causal evidence that phasic attentional reorienting during A-A-defined suboptimal states facilitates memory access at retrieval. Offline spline-detrending analysis confirms that the A-A state-memory relationship is robust to slow physiological drift. It also shows that the trigger benefit was credible for marginally suboptimal (drift-driven) SOS trials and smaller and less certain for deeply suboptimal (drift-resistant) SOS trials, consistent with a zone-of-recoverability account, although the difference between the two SOS subtypes was not credible. Furthermore, among deeply suboptimal trials the A-A-boosting trigger cue improved memory for low-A-A SOS (i.e., pupillary constriction) but not high-A-A SOS (i.e., pupillary dilation) trials, consistent with the classic inverted-U relationship between arousal and performance, although the difference between the two directions was not credible. Together, these findings causally link phasic arousal-attentional reorienting at retrieval to memory rescue and suggest that the depth and direction of suboptimality shape whether such rescue succeeds, connecting the readiness-to-remember framework to the classic arousal-performance inverted-U relationship. Moreover, these findings provide a further foundation for adaptive closed-loop technologies that would tailor intervention to the depth and direction of momentary arousal-attentional states, facilitating memory expression in real time.
ER  -