Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBMC musculoskeletal disorders

Inter-rater agreement of a pathophysiology-derived clinical assessment tool for complex regional pain syndrome type I in physiotherapy: an explorative study.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Physiotherapy, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich, CH-8008, Switzerland.
  2. 2Department of Physiotherapy, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich, CH-8008, Switzerland. [email protected].
  3. 3Department of Health, Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
  4. 4Department of Physical Medicine and Rheumatology, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich, 8008, Switzerland.

Abstract

Background

Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS) typically exhibit highly variable clinical presentations along with significant and prolonged distress. While the role of physiotherapy is considered important, clear evidence-based treatment guidelines are lacking. For development of such in the future, a subgrouping into their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms has been proposed. The aim of this study was to determine the intertester agreement of physiotherapists using a novel clinical assessment tool for patients with CRPS Type I.Methods

A total of 20 patients diagnosed with CRPS Type I underwent a clinical sensory test battery, examinations concerning body perception and measurements of vegetative processes. The examination was recorded, rated and evaluated by a total of four raters. The therapists categorized their findings into four distinct categories: peripheral sensitization, central sensitization, cortical reorganization, and vegetative responses. They then estimated the proportions of these categories for each patient. The intertester agreement on the estimations was calculated using the Bhatthacharyya coefficient, involving the assessments of four different therapists.Results

The agreement coefficient among all raters, determined through a methodology for analyzing compositional data, ranged from 0.75 to 0.93.Conclusion

The multifactorial pathophysiology and its overlap in CRPS pose significant challenges for physiotherapeutic findings and treatments for these patients. In this exploratory study, we have identified good agreement among our findings and gained valuable insights for clinical practice. Furthermore, we hope that our work will aid clinicians in structuring their management approaches for patients with CRPS Type I.

Related

  1. Thyroid Eye Disease in the Teprotumumab Era: Pathophysiology, Clinical Activity Assessment, and an Updated Therapeutic Landscape
    Tara Shooshani, Balaji Cherupalla, Amy Durand +1
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  2. Tumor-Related Trigeminal Neuralgia: Clinical Features, Pathophysiology, and the Contemporary Role of Radiosurgery in Tumor Control and Pain Relief
    Jesus Antonio Rodriguez Santos, Jennifer De Alas, Eduardo E Lovo
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Agreement between initial in-person and follow-up telemedicine assessment in patients presenting with first-time headache
    Furkan Sarıdaş, Emel Oguz-Akarsu, Müge Mercan Kara +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Thrombotic Complications in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Clinical Management—A Narrative Review
    Carmine Siniscalchi, Augusto Delle Femine, Ciro Di Gennaro +6
    Hematology reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Exploratory Agreement of 3D Body Surface Analysis with Expert Manual Assessment of Pelvic Malalignment in Patients with Non-Acute Low Back Pain: A Prospective Pilot Study with Linked Post-Hoc Analyses
    Yeon-Woo Lee, Yeong-Jae Shin, Bong-Jin Shin +8
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{erni2026interrater,
  title = {{Inter-rater agreement of a pathophysiology-derived clinical assessment tool for complex regional pain syndrome type I in physiotherapy: an explorative study.}},
  author = {Jasmin Erni and Evelyn Baertschi and Juergen Degenfellner and Hannu Luomajoki and Florian Brunner},
  journal = {BMC musculoskeletal disorders},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12891-026-10219-y},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928212},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Inter-rater agreement of a pathophysiology-derived clinical assessment tool for complex regional pain syndrome type I in physiotherapy: an explorative study.
AU  - Jasmin Erni
AU  - Evelyn Baertschi
AU  - Juergen Degenfellner
AU  - Hannu Luomajoki
AU  - Florian Brunner
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC musculoskeletal disorders
DO  - 10.1186/s12891-026-10219-y
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928212
AB  - Background  Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS) typically exhibit highly variable clinical presentations along with significant and prolonged distress. While the role of physiotherapy is considered important, clear evidence-based treatment guidelines are lacking. For development of such in the future, a subgrouping into their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms has been proposed. The aim of this study was to determine the intertester agreement of physiotherapists using a novel clinical assessment tool for patients with CRPS Type I.Methods  A total of 20 patients diagnosed with CRPS Type I underwent a clinical sensory test battery, examinations concerning body perception and measurements of vegetative processes. The examination was recorded, rated and evaluated by a total of four raters. The therapists categorized their findings into four distinct categories: peripheral sensitization, central sensitization, cortical reorganization, and vegetative responses. They then estimated the proportions of these categories for each patient. The intertester agreement on the estimations was calculated using the Bhatthacharyya coefficient, involving the assessments of four different therapists.Results  The agreement coefficient among all raters, determined through a methodology for analyzing compositional data, ranged from 0.75 to 0.93.Conclusion  The multifactorial pathophysiology and its overlap in CRPS pose significant challenges for physiotherapeutic findings and treatments for these patients. In this exploratory study, we have identified good agreement among our findings and gained valuable insights for clinical practice. Furthermore, we hope that our work will aid clinicians in structuring their management approaches for patients with CRPS Type I.
SN  - 1471-2474
ER  -