Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Brain Age Gap Associations with Externalising Behaviours in Youth: A Longitudinal Investigation in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Cohort

Abstract

Background. Early adolescence is a period of heightened risk for the emergence of externalising psychopathology, making it an important window for identifying neurodevelopmental risk markers. Differences between predicted brain age and chronological age - termed the brain age gap - reflect variation from age-typical patterns of brain structure. While brain age gap has been closely linked with internalising behaviours in adolescence, less is known about its relationship with externalising symptoms. This study examined whether brain age gap in late childhood/early adolescence (9-11 years) is associated with current externalising symptoms and whether it predicts externalising trajectories over seven-year follow-up. Methods. Participants were 10,516 adolescents (aged 9-11 at baseline; up to 18 years at follow-up) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study who met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Brain age gap for each participant was derived from an external validated prediction model (Drobinin et al., 2022) applied to baseline measurements of cortical volume, area, and subcortical volume. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between baseline brain age gap and externalising symptoms, as assessed using the Child Behaviour Checklist. Primary models were adjusted for age, sex, pubertal status, and prior to inclusion of sociodemographic covariates (ethnoracial identity and caregiver highest education). Results. A higher/more positive brain age gap was associated with greater externalising symptoms at baseline (B[SE]=0.067[0.033], p=.042), but this association was removed following sociodemographic adjustment (B[SE]=0.056[0.033], p=.088). Longitudinally, a significant brain age gap x age interaction was identified that remained evident after sociodemographic adjustment, with this relationship weakening across adolescence (B[SE]=-0.007[0.003], p=.033). Conclusions. These findings suggest that a more positive brain age gap, indicating more mature-appearing brain structure for age, in late childhood/early adolescence may be associated with externalising psychopathology, but this relationship is likely to be age- and context-dependent rather than a stable marker of persistent behavioural risk.

Related

  1. Longitudinal plasma proteome profiling after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: heterogeneous development and associations with acute GvHD
    Iris C. Kreft, Myrddin W. Verheij, Maartje van den Biggelaar +8
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
  2. Associations between the universal health coverage service coverage index and the human development index: A country-level longitudinal panel study
    Akira Hayasaka, Yasuhiro Nakanishi, Marika Nomura +1
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEndocrinology & metabolismPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  3. Longitudinal associations between task-control network functioning, cognition, and the environment in early adolescence
    K. J. Paige, C. Michael, M. F. Molloy +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Marital status and incident screen-positive cognitive impairment in a Taiwanese longitudinal cohort (2005–2016): Associations vary by cognitive screening instrument
    Yi-Chao Zhou, Yi-Chang Chou, Yin-Ling Hung +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCardiovascular medicinePLOS
  5. Longitudinal associations between screen time activities and working memory neural signatures in adolescents: Sex differences and contextual moderation.
    Sahithi Arekatla, Anthony Barrows, Leigh-Anne Cioffredi +7
    Developmental cognitive neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{asikin2026brain,
  title = {{Brain Age Gap Associations with Externalising Behaviours in Youth: A Longitudinal Investigation in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Cohort}},
  author = {A. Asikin and R. Visontay and E. K. Devine and L. M. Squeglia and H. Byrne and L. Mewton},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.22.761283},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.22.761283v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Brain Age Gap Associations with Externalising Behaviours in Youth: A Longitudinal Investigation in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Cohort
AU  - A. Asikin
AU  - R. Visontay
AU  - E. K. Devine
AU  - L. M. Squeglia
AU  - H. Byrne
AU  - L. Mewton
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.22.761283
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.22.761283v1
AB  - Background. Early adolescence is a period of heightened risk for the emergence of externalising psychopathology, making it an important window for identifying neurodevelopmental risk markers. Differences between predicted brain age and chronological age - termed the brain age gap - reflect variation from age-typical patterns of brain structure. While brain age gap has been closely linked with internalising behaviours in adolescence, less is known about its relationship with externalising symptoms. This study examined whether brain age gap in late childhood/early adolescence (9-11 years) is associated with current externalising symptoms and whether it predicts externalising trajectories over seven-year follow-up. Methods. Participants were 10,516 adolescents (aged 9-11 at baseline; up to 18 years at follow-up) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study who met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Brain age gap for each participant was derived from an external validated prediction model (Drobinin et al., 2022) applied to baseline measurements of cortical volume, area, and subcortical volume. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between baseline brain age gap and externalising symptoms, as assessed using the Child Behaviour Checklist. Primary models were adjusted for age, sex, pubertal status, and prior to inclusion of sociodemographic covariates (ethnoracial identity and caregiver highest education). Results. A higher/more positive brain age gap was associated with greater externalising symptoms at baseline (B[SE]=0.067[0.033], p=.042), but this association was removed following sociodemographic adjustment (B[SE]=0.056[0.033], p=.088). Longitudinally, a significant brain age gap x age interaction was identified that remained evident after sociodemographic adjustment, with this relationship weakening across adolescence (B[SE]=-0.007[0.003], p=.033). Conclusions. These findings suggest that a more positive brain age gap, indicating more mature-appearing brain structure for age, in late childhood/early adolescence may be associated with externalising psychopathology, but this relationship is likely to be age- and context-dependent rather than a stable marker of persistent behavioural risk.
SN  - 2692-8205
ER  -