Careers in Scientific Editing: Results from the 2024 Scientific Editors Network (ScENe) Survey
- 1One Health Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Abstract
Funding and publishing scientific research has become increasingly competitive, highlighting a growing need for clear and accurate scientific communication. Scientific editors are professionals who help ensure that grant proposals and research manuscripts meet the standards of funding agencies and peer-reviewed journals while effectively communicating research significance to diverse audiences. However, detailed information characterizing the scientific editing profession is scarce. While some organizations have conducted salary surveys, to our knowledge, no comprehensive survey of the scientific editing field has been conducted. Here, we report findings from a 2024 comprehensive survey of 132 scientific editors. We collected data on demographics and education, career experience and current employment, skills and types of editing, and outcomes and satisfaction. Our data reveal that scientific editors have homogenous demographic characteristics but considerable variability in job titles, employment mechanisms, and career pathways. As the responsibilities of many scientific editors, including supporting proposal development, applying best practices in grantsmanship, and identifying strategies to enhance competitiveness for research funding, overlap with those of research development professionals, our findings provide considerations for further incorporating or defining the role of scientific editors within research development offices. Our results also suggest avenues for scientific editors to start or advance their careers. We anticipate that our results will serve as a foundation for discussions on the future directions of the scientific editing profession as well as areas for future research and professional development.
Related
- Prognostic classification of skin adnexal carcinomas: Results from a prospective study of 980 patients in the French CARADERM network
- PrimeStack editors enable efficient and site-specific integration of large multigene cargos in plants
- How does supervisor support shape PhD students’ learning experience? Evidence from the Nature Careers 2025 Global PhD Survey
- Twin-prime editing enables endogenous protein visualization and mutant allele tracking
- Advances and Applications of Genome Editing in Precision Crop Breeding
BibTeX
@misc{aldrich2026careers,
title = {{Careers in Scientific Editing: Results from the 2024 Scientific Editors Network (ScENe) Survey}},
author = {H. Aldrich and J. Barr and B. James and R. Lawrence and M. Mayerle and A. Sutton},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.05.756087},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.05.756087v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Careers in Scientific Editing: Results from the 2024 Scientific Editors Network (ScENe) Survey
AU - H. Aldrich
AU - J. Barr
AU - B. James
AU - R. Lawrence
AU - M. Mayerle
AU - A. Sutton
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.05.756087
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.05.756087v1
AB - Funding and publishing scientific research has become increasingly competitive, highlighting a growing need for clear and accurate scientific communication. Scientific editors are professionals who help ensure that grant proposals and research manuscripts meet the standards of funding agencies and peer-reviewed journals while effectively communicating research significance to diverse audiences. However, detailed information characterizing the scientific editing profession is scarce. While some organizations have conducted salary surveys, to our knowledge, no comprehensive survey of the scientific editing field has been conducted. Here, we report findings from a 2024 comprehensive survey of 132 scientific editors. We collected data on demographics and education, career experience and current employment, skills and types of editing, and outcomes and satisfaction. Our data reveal that scientific editors have homogenous demographic characteristics but considerable variability in job titles, employment mechanisms, and career pathways. As the responsibilities of many scientific editors, including supporting proposal development, applying best practices in grantsmanship, and identifying strategies to enhance competitiveness for research funding, overlap with those of research development professionals, our findings provide considerations for further incorporating or defining the role of scientific editors within research development offices. Our results also suggest avenues for scientific editors to start or advance their careers. We anticipate that our results will serve as a foundation for discussions on the future directions of the scientific editing profession as well as areas for future research and professional development.
ER -