Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC nursing

Occupational hazards and workplace safety practices among nurses in Nablus, Palestine: a cross-sectional study.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Critical Care Nursing, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. [email protected].
  2. 2Al-Arabi Specialized Hospital, Nablus, Palestine. [email protected].
  3. 3School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  4. 4Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

Abstract

Background

Hospital nurses encounter physical, ergonomic, biological, chemical, psychological, and social occupational hazards. Although these hazards are widely recognized, a knowledge gap remains in Palestine regarding multidimensional work-related symptoms examined together with selected workplace exposure, prevention, personal protective equipment, and organizational safety practices.Methods

An analytical cross-sectional study included 140 registered nurses from medical, surgical, pediatric, and gynecology/obstetrics departments at three hospitals in Nablus, Palestine. The final analytical sample represented 87.5% of the 160 distributed questionnaires. Data were collected using an English-language structured questionnaire comprising demographic and professional characteristics, the Work-Related Symptom Scale (WRSS), and 18 study-specific heterogeneous workplace items. Because the 18 items mixed exposure conditions, preventive behaviors, personal protective equipment, cognitive demands, and organizational practices, they were interpreted primarily at item level rather than as a validated unidimensional scale. Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 19.0; subgroup comparisons were treated as exploratory.Results

Physical symptoms were reported more frequently than psychological and social symptoms. Sleep disturbances were rated present by 37.9% and highly present by 19.3% of participants; corresponding values were 33.6% and 21.4% for leg pain and 31.4% and 20.7% for back pain. Psychological and social symptoms were generally reported at lower perceived levels than physical symptoms, although underreporting cannot be excluded. Among the study-specific workplace items, the highest proportions selecting "always" were observed for hand washing (60.7%), direct contact with patients (56.4%), general safety measures (55.0%), mask use (55.0%), and documented incident reporting (50.7%). In exploratory subgroup analysis, female nurses had a higher mean physical WRSS score than male nurses (3.17 vs. 2.73; mean difference 0.44; p = 0.002).Conclusions

The findings identify a prominent pattern of sleep-related and musculoskeletal symptoms among nurses in the participating Nablus hospitals and heterogeneous responses across workplace exposure, prevention, personal protective equipment, and organizational safety items. These cross-sectional self-reported findings may inform consideration of targeted ergonomic risk assessment, safe-patient-handling support, task-specific personal protective equipment policies, incident-reporting systems, and department-level occupational safety planning. Causal and population-wide inferences should be avoided.Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Related

  1. Developing an AI-Powered Occupational Health Surveillance System for Real-Time Detection and Management of Workplace Health Hazards
    Cynthia Obianuju Ozobu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND MODERN TECHNOLOGYPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text18 citedEpidemiology & public healthOpenAlex
  2. Associations of sleep disturbance and emotion regulation with perceived workplace safety and fatigue among male firefighters with prior occupational accidents : A cross-sectional study
    Ahmet Erhan Bakirci
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Knowledge gaps and practices for glaucoma among adults in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.
    Mohammad W Awlad Mohammad, Basel Bader, Mohammad Fuad Sayes +8
    Frontiers in ophthalmologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Awareness of canned-food hazards and reported canned-food practices among health-science undergraduates at a university in south-western Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
    Joan Adebomi Osiyemi, Joshua Adekunle Osiyemi, Olusola Adeola Adenowo +1
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Knowledge and practices toward occupational health and environmental sustainability among farmers in Pabna District, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study
    S. Parvin, M. O. Rashid, M. M. Rahman +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{eshtaya2026occupational,
  title = {{Occupational hazards and workplace safety practices among nurses in Nablus, Palestine: a cross-sectional study.}},
  author = {Ahmad Eshtaya and Rajaa Shaheen},
  journal = {BMC nursing},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12912-026-05130-9},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907966},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Occupational hazards and workplace safety practices among nurses in Nablus, Palestine: a cross-sectional study.
AU  - Ahmad Eshtaya
AU  - Rajaa Shaheen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC nursing
DO  - 10.1186/s12912-026-05130-9
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907966
AB  - Background  Hospital nurses encounter physical, ergonomic, biological, chemical, psychological, and social occupational hazards. Although these hazards are widely recognized, a knowledge gap remains in Palestine regarding multidimensional work-related symptoms examined together with selected workplace exposure, prevention, personal protective equipment, and organizational safety practices.Methods  An analytical cross-sectional study included 140 registered nurses from medical, surgical, pediatric, and gynecology/obstetrics departments at three hospitals in Nablus, Palestine. The final analytical sample represented 87.5% of the 160 distributed questionnaires. Data were collected using an English-language structured questionnaire comprising demographic and professional characteristics, the Work-Related Symptom Scale (WRSS), and 18 study-specific heterogeneous workplace items. Because the 18 items mixed exposure conditions, preventive behaviors, personal protective equipment, cognitive demands, and organizational practices, they were interpreted primarily at item level rather than as a validated unidimensional scale. Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 19.0; subgroup comparisons were treated as exploratory.Results  Physical symptoms were reported more frequently than psychological and social symptoms. Sleep disturbances were rated present by 37.9% and highly present by 19.3% of participants; corresponding values were 33.6% and 21.4% for leg pain and 31.4% and 20.7% for back pain. Psychological and social symptoms were generally reported at lower perceived levels than physical symptoms, although underreporting cannot be excluded. Among the study-specific workplace items, the highest proportions selecting "always" were observed for hand washing (60.7%), direct contact with patients (56.4%), general safety measures (55.0%), mask use (55.0%), and documented incident reporting (50.7%). In exploratory subgroup analysis, female nurses had a higher mean physical WRSS score than male nurses (3.17 vs. 2.73; mean difference 0.44; p = 0.002).Conclusions  The findings identify a prominent pattern of sleep-related and musculoskeletal symptoms among nurses in the participating Nablus hospitals and heterogeneous responses across workplace exposure, prevention, personal protective equipment, and organizational safety items. These cross-sectional self-reported findings may inform consideration of targeted ergonomic risk assessment, safe-patient-handling support, task-specific personal protective equipment policies, incident-reporting systems, and department-level occupational safety planning. Causal and population-wide inferences should be avoided.Clinical trial number  Not applicable.
SN  - 1472-6955
ER  -