Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Exploiting Low-Rank Structure in Genomic Relationship Matrices for Computationally Efficient Optimum Contribution Selection

  1. 1Skogforsk Savar

Abstract

Motivation: Optimum contribution selection (OCS) maximizes genetic gain under a constraint on relatedness. Genomic relationship matrices are dense, so the quadratic term costs O(n^3) operations, and existing OCS software assumes pedigree sparsity. Results: We replace the relationship matrix by its leading eigenpairs, computed by randomized SVD, and solve OCS in factorized form. On Norway spruce population (n=5,525), ranks 10--30 kept the exact objective within 1% of the optimum at 110--330-fold speedups; on the QTL-MAS 2010 (n=3,226), ranks up to 100 were needed (24-211 fold). The required rank rises as the diversity constraint loosens. Gain alone is a misleading accuracy check, since coancestry exceeded the optimum by up to 28%, so we choose the rank on the exact objective, which can be checked without a dense solve. The speedup comes from computing only the leading eigenpairs. We extend the factorization to robust OCS (18-fold). Availability and implementation: Julia implementation, and examples are available at https://github.com/jonhar97/fastocs under the MIT license (archived at Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23214804).

Related

  1. GCOM-C/SGLI ground-area-based chlorophyll content estimation: a computationally efficient algorithm free from LAI and vegetation classification
    Tomoko Kawaguchi Akitsu, Atsushi Kume, Roxanne Lai +4
    Ecological InformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyDOAJ
  2. Discovery and Structure Activity Relationship Optimization of a Novel Rv1625c Agonist Chemotype with Antitubercular Activity
    H. Xie, P. Sukheja, K. Tolentino +14
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  3. Structure-Activity Relationship Studies of the Complement Regulator-Recruiting Peptide 5C6
    Clément Bechtler, Jannes Felsch, Ekaterina Umnyakova +4
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDImmunologyChemRxiv
  4. Neurocognitive development and its relationship to brain structure and function: Findings from the ABCD study.
    Marie T Banich, Harry R Smolker, Deanna M Barch +1
    Developmental cognitive neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  5. Design, Synthesis, and Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Spirotryprostatin A-Inspired Spirooxindole-Diketopiperazine Derivatives with Antifungal Activity
    Murong Zhan, Yangmin Ma, Gege Dang +3
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0EcologyCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{ahlinder2026exploiting,
  title = {{Exploiting Low-Rank Structure in Genomic Relationship Matrices for Computationally Efficient Optimum Contribution Selection}},
  author = {J. Ahlinder and P. Waldmann},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.07.757325},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757325v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Exploiting Low-Rank Structure in Genomic Relationship Matrices for Computationally Efficient Optimum Contribution Selection
AU  - J. Ahlinder
AU  - P. Waldmann
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.07.757325
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757325v1
AB  - Motivation: Optimum contribution selection (OCS) maximizes genetic gain under a constraint on relatedness. Genomic relationship matrices are dense, so the quadratic term costs O(n^3) operations, and existing OCS software assumes pedigree sparsity. Results: We replace the relationship matrix by its leading eigenpairs, computed by randomized SVD, and solve OCS in factorized form. On Norway spruce population (n=5,525), ranks 10--30 kept the exact objective within 1% of the optimum at 110--330-fold speedups; on the QTL-MAS 2010 (n=3,226), ranks up to 100 were needed (24-211 fold). The required rank rises as the diversity constraint loosens. Gain alone is a misleading accuracy check, since coancestry exceeded the optimum by up to 28%, so we choose the rank on the exact objective, which can be checked without a dense solve. The speedup comes from computing only the leading eigenpairs. We extend the factorization to robust OCS (18-fold). Availability and implementation: Julia implementation, and examples are available at https://github.com/jonhar97/fastocs under the MIT license (archived at Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23214804).
ER  -