Item analysis of the gastroesophageal reflux disease quality of life instrument QLICD-GERD based on classical test theory and item response theory.
5 affiliations
- 1School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650500, China.
- 2Yuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yunnan, 653100, China.
- 3Department of Gastroenterology, The People's Hospital of Lincang, Lincang, Yunnan, 677000, China. [email protected].
- 4School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650500, China. [email protected].
- 5Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Public Health and Biosafety, Kunming, Yunnan, 650500, China. [email protected].
Abstract
Background
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common digestive disorder that severely affects patients' physical and psychological health, leading to a substantial decline in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Quality of Life Instrument for Chronic Diseases-Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (QLICD-GERD, V1.0) was developed to comprehensively assess the impact of GERD using both generic and disease-specific modules. This study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties and item performance of the QLICD-GERD (V1.0) using both Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT), in order to provide theoretical and empirical support for its further refinement.Methods
A total of 207 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were recruited from the Department of Gastroenterology of a tertiary hospital in Yunnan Province, China, between January 2022 and December 2024. A total of 207 patients with GERD from the Department of Gastroenterology of a tertiary hospital in Yunnan Province (January 2022-December 2024) were investigated using the self-administered QLICD-GERD (V1.0). CTT methods-including Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, standard deviation (SD) analysis, correlation analysis, and factor analysis-were applied to evaluate reliability and validity. IRT was used to estimate item discrimination (a), difficulty parameters (b1-b4), and average information (I), using the Samejima graded response model. SPSS 27.0, AMOS, and Multilog 7.03 were used for data analysis.Results
In CTT analysis, 42 out of 48 items met the criteria of at least three statistical methods and were rated as good, while six items were rated as poor. The overall Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.848, and the split-half reliability was 0.905, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. The KMO value was 0.755, with a cumulative variance contribution of 68.51%. The revised confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model achieved improved fit indices (χ²/df = 2.493, RMSEA = 0.084, GFI = 0.700, CFI = 0.691, TLI = 0.666, IFI = 0.697). Under IRT analysis, item discrimination ranged from 0.89 to 1.44, and most difficulty parameters increased monotonically with grade levels (B1→B4). Average information values ranged from 0.064 to 0.529: 9 items in the physical domain, 2 in social, 1 in spiritual, and 14 in the disease-specific domain were classified as poor, 20 good, and 2 excellent.Conclusions
The QLICD-GERD (V1.0) demonstrates overall good psychometric properties, with strong reliability, validity, and discrimination. The psychological and social domains performed best, while several items in the physical and spiritual domains require refinement to improve measurement precision. The combination of CTT and IRT provides a comprehensive framework for optimizing the instrument's structure and enhancing its clinical applicability for assessing quality of life among GERD patients.
Related
- Item analysis and evaluation on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease quality of life scale based on classical test theory and item response theory
- Symptom normalization, care-seeking delay, and health-related quality of life in adults with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cross-sectional study.
- Association of endoscopic and CT response with pathological response after preoperative FLOT-based therapy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a retrospective cohort study
- Dissecting shared genetic susceptibility between gastroesophageal reflux disease and psychiatric disorders beyond body mass index
- Gastric motility abnormalities in pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease: A comprehensive review of mechanisms and therapeutic implications
BibTeX
@article{mu2026item,
title = {{Item analysis of the gastroesophageal reflux disease quality of life instrument QLICD-GERD based on classical test theory and item response theory.}},
author = {ZaiXue Mu and Ting Song and YanXiang Gao and QiaoYun Huang and XiRan Xia and TianLe Fu and JinJin Xu and HuaYu Sun and Yan Liu and Ying Chen},
journal = {BMC gastroenterology},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12876-026-05165-x},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902182},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Item analysis of the gastroesophageal reflux disease quality of life instrument QLICD-GERD based on classical test theory and item response theory.
AU - ZaiXue Mu
AU - Ting Song
AU - YanXiang Gao
AU - QiaoYun Huang
AU - XiRan Xia
AU - TianLe Fu
AU - JinJin Xu
AU - HuaYu Sun
AU - Yan Liu
AU - Ying Chen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC gastroenterology
DO - 10.1186/s12876-026-05165-x
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902182
AB - Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common digestive disorder that severely affects patients' physical and psychological health, leading to a substantial decline in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Quality of Life Instrument for Chronic Diseases-Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (QLICD-GERD, V1.0) was developed to comprehensively assess the impact of GERD using both generic and disease-specific modules. This study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties and item performance of the QLICD-GERD (V1.0) using both Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT), in order to provide theoretical and empirical support for its further refinement.Methods A total of 207 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were recruited from the Department of Gastroenterology of a tertiary hospital in Yunnan Province, China, between January 2022 and December 2024. A total of 207 patients with GERD from the Department of Gastroenterology of a tertiary hospital in Yunnan Province (January 2022-December 2024) were investigated using the self-administered QLICD-GERD (V1.0). CTT methods-including Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, standard deviation (SD) analysis, correlation analysis, and factor analysis-were applied to evaluate reliability and validity. IRT was used to estimate item discrimination (a), difficulty parameters (b1-b4), and average information (I), using the Samejima graded response model. SPSS 27.0, AMOS, and Multilog 7.03 were used for data analysis.Results In CTT analysis, 42 out of 48 items met the criteria of at least three statistical methods and were rated as good, while six items were rated as poor. The overall Cronbach's alpha of the scale was 0.848, and the split-half reliability was 0.905, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. The KMO value was 0.755, with a cumulative variance contribution of 68.51%. The revised confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model achieved improved fit indices (χ²/df = 2.493, RMSEA = 0.084, GFI = 0.700, CFI = 0.691, TLI = 0.666, IFI = 0.697). Under IRT analysis, item discrimination ranged from 0.89 to 1.44, and most difficulty parameters increased monotonically with grade levels (B1→B4). Average information values ranged from 0.064 to 0.529: 9 items in the physical domain, 2 in social, 1 in spiritual, and 14 in the disease-specific domain were classified as poor, 20 good, and 2 excellent.Conclusions The QLICD-GERD (V1.0) demonstrates overall good psychometric properties, with strong reliability, validity, and discrimination. The psychological and social domains performed best, while several items in the physical and spiritual domains require refinement to improve measurement precision. The combination of CTT and IRT provides a comprehensive framework for optimizing the instrument's structure and enhancing its clinical applicability for assessing quality of life among GERD patients.
SN - 1471-230X
ER -