Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Systemic and organ-specific proteomic aging clocks as predictors of cancer incidence and survival: insights from the Finnish Twin Cohort

  1. 1Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FINLAND; Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, Helsinki, FINLAN

Abstract

Despite recent evidence of the ability of systemic and organ-specific proteomic aging clocks to predict a large range of age-related diseases, their utility in cancer research remains largely underexplored. In this study, we evaluated the predictive ability of systemic and organ-specific proteomic aging clocks for (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) cancer-related mortality, and (iii) cancer incidence in a sample of Finnish twins (N = 401, mean age at baseline 62.3 years) with Olink proteomic data. Participants were followed for a mean of 10.6 years (SD {+/-} 1.6), with estimates from four systemic and 18 organ-specific proteomic aging clocks calculated at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for sex and age at baseline identified 15 proteomic aging clocks as significant predictors of all-cause mortality (Ncases = 28) after multiple testing correction (FDR < 0.05), with 11 remaining significant after lifestyle adjustment (Ncases = 27). For several clocks, effect sizes were large, with hazard ratios (HR) approximately doubling per one standard deviation (SD) increase in clock estimates. In predicting cancer-related deaths among participants without a prior cancer diagnosis at baseline (Ncases = 9), only the Immune clock showed a significant positive association after multiple testing correction in basic (HR = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.88-4.59) and lifestyle-adjusted models (HR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.78-6.17). No associations with cancer incidence (Ncases = 34 basic, Ncases = 31 adjusted) survived multiple testing correction, although several nominal associations were observed. In conclusion, our findings suggest that proteomic aging clocks are strong predictors of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality, independent of lifestyle factors. Proteomic aging clocks may further serve as valuable tools for stratifying cancers by mortality risk.

Related

  1. Incidence and Predictors of Systemic Complications in Hospitalized Patients With Cervical Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
    SHIH-HSIANG KING, MENG-HSUAN HSIEH, TING-LIN YEN +1
    In VivoPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. Incidence and predictors of acute decompensation in adult patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective cohort study at the University of Gondar comprehensive Specialized Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2025
    Kassaye Demeke Altaye, Lakew Asmare, Fantahun Ayenew Mekonnen
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  3. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis and mosaic sex chromosome loss define distinct systemic proteomic programs and disease vulnerabilities
    M. Weyrich, A. Ware, A. Steixner-Kumar +6
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textHuman geneticsmedRxiv
  4. Incidence and predictors of urinary tract infections after sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor initiation in older adults hospitalized for heart failure
    Jean-Baptiste Robiaud, Arthur Leroy-Mobeche, Gilles Berrut +6
    Archives of cardiovascular diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  5. Incidence of Osteoradionecrosis and Dental Implant Survival in Patients With Irradiated Head and Neck Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nirmalya Chatterjee, Amrita Ghosh, Arka Swarnakar +1
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{lukander2026systemic,
  title = {{Systemic and organ-specific proteomic aging clocks as predictors of cancer incidence and survival: insights from the Finnish Twin Cohort}},
  author = {V. M. Lukander and J. M. Kaprio and X. Wang and M. Ollikainen and G. Drouard},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.14.26365410},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.26365410v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Systemic and organ-specific proteomic aging clocks as predictors of cancer incidence and survival: insights from the Finnish Twin Cohort
AU  - V. M. Lukander
AU  - J. M. Kaprio
AU  - X. Wang
AU  - M. Ollikainen
AU  - G. Drouard
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.14.26365410
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.14.26365410v1
AB  - Despite recent evidence of the ability of systemic and organ-specific proteomic aging clocks to predict a large range of age-related diseases, their utility in cancer research remains largely underexplored. In this study, we evaluated the predictive ability of systemic and organ-specific proteomic aging clocks for (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) cancer-related mortality, and (iii) cancer incidence in a sample of Finnish twins (N = 401, mean age at baseline 62.3 years) with Olink proteomic data. Participants were followed for a mean of 10.6 years (SD {+/-} 1.6), with estimates from four systemic and 18 organ-specific proteomic aging clocks calculated at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for sex and age at baseline identified 15 proteomic aging clocks as significant predictors of all-cause mortality (Ncases = 28) after multiple testing correction (FDR < 0.05), with 11 remaining significant after lifestyle adjustment (Ncases = 27). For several clocks, effect sizes were large, with hazard ratios (HR) approximately doubling per one standard deviation (SD) increase in clock estimates. In predicting cancer-related deaths among participants without a prior cancer diagnosis at baseline (Ncases = 9), only the Immune clock showed a significant positive association after multiple testing correction in basic (HR = 2.94, 95% CI: 1.88-4.59) and lifestyle-adjusted models (HR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.78-6.17). No associations with cancer incidence (Ncases = 34 basic, Ncases = 31 adjusted) survived multiple testing correction, although several nominal associations were observed. In conclusion, our findings suggest that proteomic aging clocks are strong predictors of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality, independent of lifestyle factors. Proteomic aging clocks may further serve as valuable tools for stratifying cancers by mortality risk.
ER  -