Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,460 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

Partial-State Deadzone-Adapted Disturbance Suppression Control For Strict-Feedback Systems

Abstract

In this paper we provide an extension of the partial-state Deadzone-Adapted Disturbance Suppression (DADS) adaptive control scheme in the case of strict-feedback systems. We study two cases: the cases of strict-feedback systems with and without integrators. The DADS controller achieves attenuation of the output to an assignable small level, despite the presence of (time-varying) disturbances, unknown (time-varying) parameters and unknown (time-varying) input coefficients; all of them with arbitrary and unknown bounds. The mechanism that makes DADS work is the same in all previously studied cases where DADS has been applied: the update law "pumps up" the nonlinear controller gain to a sufficient size, adapting the gain to the unknown uncertainties, and shuts off further pumping up of the gain once the output is in the residual set. The results are directly extended to the infinite-dimensional case. Two simple examples are provided: one finite-dimensional example and one infinite-dimensional example. The finite-dimensional example is used for a detailed comparison with existing results in the literature.

Related

  1. A Polynomial-Time Algorithm for the Minimal Input/Output Node Cardinality Disturbance Decoupling Problem via Output Feedback
    Luca Claude Gino Lebon, Jorke de Vlas, Johannes K. Fichte +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Online Individualized Treatment Selection under Partial Feedback: False Discovery Control and Minimax Optimality
    Runzhe Gu, Zinan Zhao, Wenguang Sun +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Extremal expectations in card guessing with partial feedback: proofs of two conjectures of Diaconis-Graham-Spiro
    Congyi Luo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsProbabilityarXiv
  4. Rapid stabilization for Stokes and Navier-Stokes systems with localized disturbance
    Christian Calle, Patricio Guzmán, Hugo Parada +1
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsOptimisation & controlHALarXiv
  5. New Tools for Finite-Time Fuzzy Control of Fractional-Order Systems: Stability Lemmas, Composite Disturbance Observers, and Singularity-Free Designs
    Abdesselem Boulkroune, Naamane Bounar, Farouk Zouari +1
    AxiomsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{karafyllis2026partialstate,
  title = {{Partial-State Deadzone-Adapted Disturbance Suppression Control For Strict-Feedback Systems}},
  author = {Iasson Karafyllis and Alexandros Aslanidis and Miroslav Krstic},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.05797},
  eprint = {2610.05797},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05797},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Partial-State Deadzone-Adapted Disturbance Suppression Control For Strict-Feedback Systems
AU  - Iasson Karafyllis
AU  - Alexandros Aslanidis
AU  - Miroslav Krstic
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.05797
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05797
AB  - In this paper we provide an extension of the partial-state Deadzone-Adapted Disturbance Suppression (DADS) adaptive control scheme in the case of strict-feedback systems. We study two cases: the cases of strict-feedback systems with and without integrators. The DADS controller achieves attenuation of the output to an assignable small level, despite the presence of (time-varying) disturbances, unknown (time-varying) parameters and unknown (time-varying) input coefficients; all of them with arbitrary and unknown bounds. The mechanism that makes DADS work is the same in all previously studied cases where DADS has been applied: the update law "pumps up" the nonlinear controller gain to a sufficient size, adapting the gain to the unknown uncertainties, and shuts off further pumping up of the gain once the output is in the residual set. The results are directly extended to the infinite-dimensional case. Two simple examples are provided: one finite-dimensional example and one infinite-dimensional example. The finite-dimensional example is used for a detailed comparison with existing results in the literature.
ER  -