Dietary ethanol produces endpoint-specific dose responses in honeybees
- 1Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences; Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
Abstract
Ethanol is naturally present in nectar, but we still know little about how pollinators cope with long-term exposure to it at low concentrations. We exposed adult worker honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica Poll.) for eight days to diets containing 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, or 10% ethanol and measured survival, estimated intake, open-field locomotion, sting extension, whole-body trehalose, and hemolymph ethanol. Hemolymph ethanol was correlated with dietary concentration, attesting to internal exposure. Survival differed among diets, an effect which was driven by the difference between the 10% ethanol treatment and the control. Food intake was lowest at the 10% ethanol diet. There was also a modest increase in intake under the 0.1% ethanol treatment. In terms of locomotor features, bees moved less, moved more slowly, explored less space, covered shorter distances, and followed more tortuous paths after the 10% ethanol treatment. Neither sting extension nor trehalose were affected by dietary ethanol. The results showed no beneficial stimulation at lower concentrations. Instead, performance was endpoint-specific: at 0.1-2% ethanol in the diet, performance remained relatively stable across most parameters, whilst clear impairment was evident at 10%. These findings highlight resilience to repeated ethanol exposure in honeybees.
Related
- Variant-Specific Rewiring of Lysosomal Positioning by STARD9 Produces Opposite Cholesterol Trafficking Outcomes
- Closed-head injury produces a delayed, region-specific defect in glucose-carbon routing at the pyruvate branchpoint in APP/PS1 KI mice
- Preconception stress in mice alters maternal behavioral, neural, and endocrine outcomes, and produces sex-specific disruptions in offspring
- Fecal virome addition promotes biofilm biomass and produces distinct bacterial responses in biofilm and planktonic communities in an in vitro colon model
- Ark-ADMET: endpoint-specific selection of molecular representations and hyperparameters for gradient-boosted ADMET models under the Therapeutics Data Commons benchmark protocol
BibTeX
@misc{miler2026dietary,
title = {{Dietary ethanol produces endpoint-specific dose responses in honeybees}},
author = {K. Miler and W. Antol and M. Ostap-Chec and D. Bajorek},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.12.749844},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.12.749844v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Dietary ethanol produces endpoint-specific dose responses in honeybees
AU - K. Miler
AU - W. Antol
AU - M. Ostap-Chec
AU - D. Bajorek
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/12
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.12.749844
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.12.749844v1
AB - Ethanol is naturally present in nectar, but we still know little about how pollinators cope with long-term exposure to it at low concentrations. We exposed adult worker honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica Poll.) for eight days to diets containing 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, or 10% ethanol and measured survival, estimated intake, open-field locomotion, sting extension, whole-body trehalose, and hemolymph ethanol. Hemolymph ethanol was correlated with dietary concentration, attesting to internal exposure. Survival differed among diets, an effect which was driven by the difference between the 10% ethanol treatment and the control. Food intake was lowest at the 10% ethanol diet. There was also a modest increase in intake under the 0.1% ethanol treatment. In terms of locomotor features, bees moved less, moved more slowly, explored less space, covered shorter distances, and followed more tortuous paths after the 10% ethanol treatment. Neither sting extension nor trehalose were affected by dietary ethanol. The results showed no beneficial stimulation at lower concentrations. Instead, performance was endpoint-specific: at 0.1-2% ethanol in the diet, performance remained relatively stable across most parameters, whilst clear impairment was evident at 10%. These findings highlight resilience to repeated ethanol exposure in honeybees.
ER -