Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,472 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Corrected Integrated Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Inference in Latent Gaussian Models

Abstract

Latent Gaussian models (LGMs) are a popular class of Bayesian hierarchical models that include Gaussian processes, as well as certain spatial models and mixed-effect models. Efficient Bayesian inference of LGMs often requires marginalizing out the latent variables. For LGMs with a non-Gaussian likelihood, exact marginalization is not possible and a popular approach is to do approximate marginalization with an integrated Laplace approximation (ILA). Using ILA produces an approximate posterior which, in some settings, can differ significantly from the correct posterior, which impacts downstream applications. We propose an importance sampling scheme to correct the error introduced by ILA. By increasing the number of samples in importance sampling, the posterior with ILA converges to the correct posterior. This idea is realized with various techniques, including pseudo-marginalization, quasi-Monte Carlo and randomized quasi-Monte Carlo. We implement our methods in an automatic differentiation framework to support gradient-based algorithms when doing inference on the hyperparameters. For the latter, we specifically consider the use of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. We demonstrate the benefits of reduced error in various applied models.

Related

  1. Gaussian approximation for the integrated intensity of counting processes: application to Hawkes processes
    Benjamin Massat
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityHALarXiv
  2. Inconsistency between Frequentist and Bayesian inference, approximation of improper priors and permissible priors
    Pierre Druilhet, Erwan Saint Loubert Bié
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Strong Gaussian Approximation of Constant Learning Rate SGD: Bias and Trajectory Inference
    Joseph Keslin, Wei Biao Wu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Wrench-Based Bayesian Pose Estimation via Matrix--Fisher Gaussian Inference
    Jianyu Chen, Lin Yang, Yibang Li +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Bias-Corrected Empirical-Likelihood Inference for Single-Index Expectile Regression Under Missing-at-Random Responses
    Pingping Liu, Shuanghua Luo, Junxiang Lu
    AxiomsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{lai2026corrected,
  title = {{Corrected Integrated Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Inference in Latent Gaussian Models}},
  author = {Jinlin Lai and Charles C. Margossian and Daniel Sheldon},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.20345},
  eprint = {2605.20345},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20345},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Corrected Integrated Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Inference in Latent Gaussian Models
AU  - Jinlin Lai
AU  - Charles C. Margossian
AU  - Daniel Sheldon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.20345
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20345
AB  - Latent Gaussian models (LGMs) are a popular class of Bayesian hierarchical models that include Gaussian processes, as well as certain spatial models and mixed-effect models. Efficient Bayesian inference of LGMs often requires marginalizing out the latent variables. For LGMs with a non-Gaussian likelihood, exact marginalization is not possible and a popular approach is to do approximate marginalization with an integrated Laplace approximation (ILA). Using ILA produces an approximate posterior which, in some settings, can differ significantly from the correct posterior, which impacts downstream applications. We propose an importance sampling scheme to correct the error introduced by ILA. By increasing the number of samples in importance sampling, the posterior with ILA converges to the correct posterior. This idea is realized with various techniques, including pseudo-marginalization, quasi-Monte Carlo and randomized quasi-Monte Carlo. We implement our methods in an automatic differentiation framework to support gradient-based algorithms when doing inference on the hyperparameters. For the latter, we specifically consider the use of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. We demonstrate the benefits of reduced error in various applied models.
ER  -