Cost-effectiveness of malaria prevention strategies in children under five in high-endemic settings
Abstract
Optimising malaria prevention in resource-constrained high-endemic areas remains a global health priority. Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of combined prevention strategies remains limited. This study assesses alternative strategies to inform policy and resources allocation decisions. We developed a decision tree model to compare 5 strategies for children under 5: vaccine+seasonal malaria chemoprevention(SMC)+insecticide-treated nets(ITNs); SMC+ITNs; SMC alone; ITNs alone; and no prevention. The analysis adopted a healthcare system perspective. Probabilities of clinical malaria, hospitalisation and death were derived from Burkina Faso surveillance data (2010–24). Costs were obtained from the literature and standardised to 2024 values. A scenario analysis including major complications used RCT data from West Africa. Treatment duration was assumed to be 7 days for mild or moderate and 14 days for severe cases. Outcomes were expressed as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated with one way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The strategy vaccine+SMC+ITNs achieved the greatest reduction in disease burden (0.023 DALYs) at higher cost (US$23.06) with an ICER of $97.43 per DALY averted. SMC alone showed the lowest-cost ($16.58) with relatively low disease burden (0.027 DALYs). Strategies SMC+ITNs and ITNs alone were dominated, showing higher costs and worse outcomes compared to SMC alone. No prevention resulted in the highest disease burden. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings, with the combined strategy remaining cost-effective across scenarios. The addition of vaccination to existing preventive measures provides the greatest health gains and remains cost-effective, despite higher costs. SMC alone is a pragmatic alternative where resources are limited. These findings support prioritising integrated prevention strategies to maximise population health impact in malaria-endemic regions.
Key messages: • Combining vaccination, SMC, and ITNs yields the greatest reduction in malaria burden in children and remains cost-effective across scenarios in high-endemic, resource-limited settings.
• Where resources are limited, SMC alone is a low-cost, effective option, but integrated strategies deliver the highest health impact and should guide policy priorities.
Related
- Data-driven modelling of malaria transmission among under-five children to inform targeted control strategies in Rivers State, Nigeria
- Effectiveness of community-based care pathways and relapse prevention strategies in schizophrenia: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis
- Strategies and approaches to vector control effectiveness toward the elimination of malaria in mainland Tanzania: An implementation case study analysis
- Comparative effectiveness of five treatment strategies for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma in resource-limited settings: a multinomial overlap-weighted real-world cohort study
- Delivery strategies for malaria chemoprevention in the post-discharge management of children hospitalised with severe anaemia or severe malaria: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled implementation trial in Benin
BibTeX
@article{bashlakova2026costeffectiveness,
title = {{Cost-effectiveness of malaria prevention strategies in children under five in high-endemic settings}},
author = {K Bashlakova and M Zarro and G Federico and A Rosso and C De Vito},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1826},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1826},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Cost-effectiveness of malaria prevention strategies in children under five in high-endemic settings
AU - K Bashlakova
AU - M Zarro
AU - G Federico
AU - A Rosso
AU - C De Vito
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1826
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1826
AB - Optimising malaria prevention in resource-constrained high-endemic areas remains a global health priority. Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of combined prevention strategies remains limited. This study assesses alternative strategies to inform policy and resources allocation decisions. We developed a decision tree model to compare 5 strategies for children under 5: vaccine+seasonal malaria chemoprevention(SMC)+insecticide-treated nets(ITNs); SMC+ITNs; SMC alone; ITNs alone; and no prevention. The analysis adopted a healthcare system perspective. Probabilities of clinical malaria, hospitalisation and death were derived from Burkina Faso surveillance data (2010–24). Costs were obtained from the literature and standardised to 2024 values. A scenario analysis including major complications used RCT data from West Africa. Treatment duration was assumed to be 7 days for mild or moderate and 14 days for severe cases. Outcomes were expressed as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated with one way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The strategy vaccine+SMC+ITNs achieved the greatest reduction in disease burden (0.023 DALYs) at higher cost (US$23.06) with an ICER of $97.43 per DALY averted. SMC alone showed the lowest-cost ($16.58) with relatively low disease burden (0.027 DALYs). Strategies SMC+ITNs and ITNs alone were dominated, showing higher costs and worse outcomes compared to SMC alone. No prevention resulted in the highest disease burden. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings, with the combined strategy remaining cost-effective across scenarios. The addition of vaccination to existing preventive measures provides the greatest health gains and remains cost-effective, despite higher costs. SMC alone is a pragmatic alternative where resources are limited. These findings support prioritising integrated prevention strategies to maximise population health impact in malaria-endemic regions. Key messages: • Combining vaccination, SMC, and ITNs yields the greatest reduction in malaria burden in children and remains cost-effective across scenarios in high-endemic, resource-limited settings. • Where resources are limited, SMC alone is a low-cost, effective option, but integrated strategies deliver the highest health impact and should guide policy priorities.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -