Legal regulation of conscientious objection to abortion in Australia: qualitative study among key interest-holders
Abstract
Conscientious objection (CO) provisions exist in abortion legislation in each Australian state and territory. These provisions embody a compromise approach to regulation—permitting conscientious objectors to opt out of abortion care they object to in certain circumstances, provided they fulfil prescribed obligations to facilitate abortion seekers’ access to lawful abortion care. However, evidence suggests that, in practice, current regulatory approaches are not operating optimally or serving their policy goals. In this article, we report the findings from a qualitative study exploring the perspectives and experiences of 41 interest-holders about Australia’s current approach to CO legal regulation in relation to abortion. Using framework analysis, we identified five themes: the desirability of protecting CO in Australian abortion law; boundaries placed on the scope of CO protections; striking a balance through the imposition of obligations; the limitations of current Australian CO legal provisions; and effective regulation of CO is beyond the contours of law. Our study found some support for a compromise approach to CO regulation, but identified a need to improve current regulatory approaches. While some improvements could be made to legislation, an effective regulatory response will likely need to be multi-pronged and consider the role of other regulatory instruments.
Related
- Travel time modelling of access to surgical abortion services in Australia: A nationwide spatial analysis of distance, geographic, and socio-economic inequities
- Negotiating safety and inclusivity: a qualitative analysis examining public priorities for sexual behaviour screening in blood donation in Australia
- "…our goal is to avoid abortions whenever possible.": A qualitative study on clinical and structural barriers to abortion in Mongolia in 2025.
- Stakeholder perspectives on sustainable antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APOCUS) implementation in rural Australia: a qualitative study of professional body submissions and clinician focus groups.
- Strategies to improve uptake of adolescent family planning and post-abortion care services in Northern Uganda: a qualitative descriptive study
BibTeX
@article{haining2026legal,
title = {{Legal regulation of conscientious objection to abortion in Australia: qualitative study among key interest-holders}},
author = {Casey M Haining and Bronwen Merner and Lindy Willmott and Julian Savulescu and Louise A Keogh},
journal = {Medical Law Review},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/medlaw/fwag039},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwag039},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Legal regulation of conscientious objection to abortion in Australia: qualitative study among key interest-holders
AU - Casey M Haining
AU - Bronwen Merner
AU - Lindy Willmott
AU - Julian Savulescu
AU - Louise A Keogh
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - Medical Law Review
DO - 10.1093/medlaw/fwag039
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwag039
AB - Conscientious objection (CO) provisions exist in abortion legislation in each Australian state and territory. These provisions embody a compromise approach to regulation—permitting conscientious objectors to opt out of abortion care they object to in certain circumstances, provided they fulfil prescribed obligations to facilitate abortion seekers’ access to lawful abortion care. However, evidence suggests that, in practice, current regulatory approaches are not operating optimally or serving their policy goals. In this article, we report the findings from a qualitative study exploring the perspectives and experiences of 41 interest-holders about Australia’s current approach to CO legal regulation in relation to abortion. Using framework analysis, we identified five themes: the desirability of protecting CO in Australian abortion law; boundaries placed on the scope of CO protections; striking a balance through the imposition of obligations; the limitations of current Australian CO legal provisions; and effective regulation of CO is beyond the contours of law. Our study found some support for a compromise approach to CO regulation, but identified a need to improve current regulatory approaches. While some improvements could be made to legislation, an effective regulatory response will likely need to be multi-pronged and consider the role of other regulatory instruments.
SN - 0967-0742
SN - 1464-3790
ER -