Health-system preparedness for early detection of mild cognitive impairment: primary-care evidence from a national study among general practitioners in Romania
4 affiliations
- 1School of Advanced Studies of the Romanian Academy (SCOSAAR), Romanian Academy
- 2Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
- 3Department of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Old Age Psychiatry and Longevity Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
- 4Research Department, Ana Aslan International Foundation
Abstract
Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a growing public health concern in aging populations. In Romania, adults aged 65 years and over comprise about one fifth of the population, and estimated MCI prevalence in this age group is among the highest in Europe (28.5%), yet no organised national programme for systematic early detection exists. General practitioners (GPs) are well positioned to contribute to population-level detection, but their knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding MCI have not been evaluated nationally. This study assessed these domains as primary-care indicators of health-system preparedness for early MCI detection.
Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional study among GPs practicing in Romania between June 2025 and January 2026, using an online self-administered questionnaire adapted from a published knowledge, attitudes and practices instrument. Analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations, group comparisons and multiple linear regression.
Results: A total of 547 eligible GPs were included; 365–416 completed the questionnaire sections. The mean knowledge score was 33.20 (SD = 16.37): only 6.5% identified the Petersen diagnostic criteria, 10.8% recognized the most used cognitive screening instrument and 20.7% identified modifiable risk factors. Attitudes towards MCI detection were favorable (mean = 73.26, SD = 6.96). Nearly all GPs (97.9%) agreed that they should be involved in MCI detection, while 91.4% believed that early detection may delay progression to Alzheimer’s disease. Reported practices were more variable (mean = 73.01, SD = 11.53), and only 29.0% routinely used screening tools. Regression models explained a modest proportion of variance in reported practice. Higher practice scores were associated with more favorable attitudes, greater knowledge, MCI-specific training, and higher daily patient volume, whereas larger registered patient lists were associated with lower practice scores. Only 10.8% had received MCI-specific training.
Conclusion: Romanian GPs strongly support early MCI detection, but this willingness coexists with knowledge gaps, limited screening use, scarce training and workload constraints. In a high-prevalence aging population without an organised national programme, these findings indicate a public health gap between population need and health-system preparedness. Strengthening early detection is likely to require targeted continuing medical education, feasible screening recommendations and organizational support for structured cognitive assessment.
Related
- FDG PET evidence suggests the left insula may be a hub for cognitive reserve in mild cognitive impairment
- Extracellular vesicles in vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: a neurovascular evidence map for patient stratification and clinical translation
- Network representations of digital clock drawings for cognitive impairment detection
- Detection of suspected cognitive impairment and risk factors among older adults in the Maldives
- Nutritional Exposures and Cognitive Impairment in Alcohol Use Disorder: A Structured Narrative Review of Prioritized Human Evidence
BibTeX
@article{paraschiv2026healthsystem,
title = {{Health-system preparedness for early detection of mild cognitive impairment: primary-care evidence from a national study among general practitioners in Romania}},
author = {Alex-Constantin Paraschiv and Luiza Spiru and Andreea Stamate and Daniela Mănuc},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1969120},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1969120/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Health-system preparedness for early detection of mild cognitive impairment: primary-care evidence from a national study among general practitioners in Romania
AU - Alex-Constantin Paraschiv
AU - Luiza Spiru
AU - Andreea Stamate
AU - Daniela Mănuc
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1969120
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1969120/full
AB - Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a growing public health concern in aging populations. In Romania, adults aged 65 years and over comprise about one fifth of the population, and estimated MCI prevalence in this age group is among the highest in Europe (28.5%), yet no organised national programme for systematic early detection exists. General practitioners (GPs) are well positioned to contribute to population-level detection, but their knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding MCI have not been evaluated nationally. This study assessed these domains as primary-care indicators of health-system preparedness for early MCI detection. Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional study among GPs practicing in Romania between June 2025 and January 2026, using an online self-administered questionnaire adapted from a published knowledge, attitudes and practices instrument. Analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations, group comparisons and multiple linear regression. Results: A total of 547 eligible GPs were included; 365–416 completed the questionnaire sections. The mean knowledge score was 33.20 (SD = 16.37): only 6.5% identified the Petersen diagnostic criteria, 10.8% recognized the most used cognitive screening instrument and 20.7% identified modifiable risk factors. Attitudes towards MCI detection were favorable (mean = 73.26, SD = 6.96). Nearly all GPs (97.9%) agreed that they should be involved in MCI detection, while 91.4% believed that early detection may delay progression to Alzheimer’s disease. Reported practices were more variable (mean = 73.01, SD = 11.53), and only 29.0% routinely used screening tools. Regression models explained a modest proportion of variance in reported practice. Higher practice scores were associated with more favorable attitudes, greater knowledge, MCI-specific training, and higher daily patient volume, whereas larger registered patient lists were associated with lower practice scores. Only 10.8% had received MCI-specific training. Conclusion: Romanian GPs strongly support early MCI detection, but this willingness coexists with knowledge gaps, limited screening use, scarce training and workload constraints. In a high-prevalence aging population without an organised national programme, these findings indicate a public health gap between population need and health-system preparedness. Strengthening early detection is likely to require targeted continuing medical education, feasible screening recommendations and organizational support for structured cognitive assessment.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -