Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Eliminating Tokamak Disruptions with Feedback

Abstract

Tokamak disruptions caused by tearing modes can be prevented with magnetic feedback. A database of DIII-D locked mode disruptions provides criteria for major disruptions. The main criterion is that the q = 2 rational surface must be sufficiently close to the resistive wall surrounding the plasma to interact with it. This is shown in simulations of a sequence of model equilibria derived from the database. If the wall is ideally conducting, major disruptions do not occur. Magnetic feedback emulates a conducting wall, and can prevent major disruptions. Feedback coils must be designed appropriately, otherwise they are not effective in disruption prevention. Simulations of a model of MST also show the q = 2 criterion for major disruptions, as well as feedback stabilization. Feedback offers an attractive alternative to disruption mitigation by impurity injection.

Related

  1. Implementation and verification of the avalanche source in a 3D full-f particle-in-cell model of relativistic electrons for studies of tokamak disruptions
    Fiona Wouters, Hannes Bergström, Matthias Hoelzl +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPlasma physicsarXiv
  2. From Forecasting to Feedback: Evaluating Learned Dynamics for Tokamak Control
    Guoyang Shi, Siqi Ding, Xuanhe Wang +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPlasma physicsarXiv
  3. Comments on the paper "Eliminating beam-induced depolarizing effects in the hydrogen jet target for high-precision proton beam polarimetry at the Electron-Ion Collider"
    Andrei Poblaguev
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
  4. [SUPERSEDED] The Kronos Integrated Platform: A Spherical-Tokamak Breeder and a Deuterium-Helium-3 Burner as One Strategic-Materials and Power Architecture
    Priyanca Ford, G L Kulcinski
    OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)PreprintLicence not stated45 citedHigh-energy & particle physicsOpenAlex
  5. Tokamak-SI: Interpreting Tokamak Discharges with Labeled Catalogs
    Nathaniel Chen, Alvin Garcia, Ricardo Shousha +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPlasma physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{strauss2026eliminating,
  title = {{Eliminating Tokamak Disruptions with Feedback}},
  author = {H. R. Strauss},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06189},
  eprint = {2610.06189},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06189},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Eliminating Tokamak Disruptions with Feedback
AU  - H. R. Strauss
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06189
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06189
AB  - Tokamak disruptions caused by tearing modes can be prevented with magnetic feedback. A database of DIII-D locked mode disruptions provides criteria for major disruptions. The main criterion is that the q = 2 rational surface must be sufficiently close to the resistive wall surrounding the plasma to interact with it. This is shown in simulations of a sequence of model equilibria derived from the database. If the wall is ideally conducting, major disruptions do not occur. Magnetic feedback emulates a conducting wall, and can prevent major disruptions. Feedback coils must be designed appropriately, otherwise they are not effective in disruption prevention. Simulations of a model of MST also show the q = 2 criterion for major disruptions, as well as feedback stabilization. Feedback offers an attractive alternative to disruption mitigation by impurity injection.
ER  -