Sugar-sweetened beverage regulations and nutrient profiling models in five South Asian countries: a scoping review of available evidence and policy gaps
4 affiliations
- 1ARK Foundation
- 2Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka
- 3Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University
- 4HERD International
Abstract
Background Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) contribute to the rising burden of non-communicable diseases in South Asia. Evidence on existing regulatory approaches and the use of nutrient profiling models (NPMs) remains fragmented. This scoping review maps available evidence on SSB regulation in five South Asian countries. Methods We conducted a scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and PRISMA-ScR. Seven databases and grey literature were searched for studies published up to January 2025. Eligible sources examined SSB-related regulatory approaches in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Data were charted and synthesised across taxation, labelling, marketing and availability restrictions. Results Seventeen studies were included. Taxation was the most frequently reported policy, implemented mainly as ad valorem or category-based taxes, except in Sri Lanka where a sugar-based excise tax was applied. Labelling, marketing, and availability restrictions were limited and unevenly implemented. Only four studies reported the use of NPMs, largely confined to Sri Lanka. Evidence on policy effectiveness, enforcement, and equity impacts was limited. Industry interference and weak regulatory capacity were commonly reported barriers. Conclusion SSB regulation in South Asia is dominated by taxation, with limited use of nutrient-based approaches and weak implementation of complementary measures. Strengthening policy design, enforcement, and evidence on effectiveness is critical to advance SSB control in the region.
Related
- Food-Related Online Media Viewing (Mukbang and Cookbang) and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage and Artificially Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Korean Adolescents: Using the 2025 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Survey
- What happens when sugar-sweetened beverage labelling and tax policies are extended to non-sugar sweetened beverages? A national study of Australians’ responses
- Association Between Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Consumption and All‐Cause Mortality in Individuals With and Without Metabolic Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study
- Free Sugars and Source-Resolved Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in Geographically Diverse Young Adults at an English University (2015–2016): Associations with Adiposity and Body Composition
- Combining natural language processing with patient-reported outcome measures scores to investigate the association of pandemic regulations with anxiety in children
BibTeX
@article{abdullah2026sugarsweetened,
title = {{Sugar-sweetened beverage regulations and nutrient profiling models in five South Asian countries: a scoping review of available evidence and policy gaps}},
author = {S M Abdullah and Tahzir Faiaz Chowdhury and Priyanka Jayawardena and Maira Mubashir and Sujan Sapkota and Ghanshyam Gautam and Ranjeeta Subedi and Nisha Arunatilake and Romaina Iqbal and Rumana Huque},
journal = {BMC Nutrition},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s40795-026-01444-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01444-8},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Sugar-sweetened beverage regulations and nutrient profiling models in five South Asian countries: a scoping review of available evidence and policy gaps
AU - S M Abdullah
AU - Tahzir Faiaz Chowdhury
AU - Priyanka Jayawardena
AU - Maira Mubashir
AU - Sujan Sapkota
AU - Ghanshyam Gautam
AU - Ranjeeta Subedi
AU - Nisha Arunatilake
AU - Romaina Iqbal
AU - Rumana Huque
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC Nutrition
DO - 10.1186/s40795-026-01444-8
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01444-8
AB - Background Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) contribute to the rising burden of non-communicable diseases in South Asia. Evidence on existing regulatory approaches and the use of nutrient profiling models (NPMs) remains fragmented. This scoping review maps available evidence on SSB regulation in five South Asian countries. Methods We conducted a scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and PRISMA-ScR. Seven databases and grey literature were searched for studies published up to January 2025. Eligible sources examined SSB-related regulatory approaches in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Data were charted and synthesised across taxation, labelling, marketing and availability restrictions. Results Seventeen studies were included. Taxation was the most frequently reported policy, implemented mainly as ad valorem or category-based taxes, except in Sri Lanka where a sugar-based excise tax was applied. Labelling, marketing, and availability restrictions were limited and unevenly implemented. Only four studies reported the use of NPMs, largely confined to Sri Lanka. Evidence on policy effectiveness, enforcement, and equity impacts was limited. Industry interference and weak regulatory capacity were commonly reported barriers. Conclusion SSB regulation in South Asia is dominated by taxation, with limited use of nutrient-based approaches and weak implementation of complementary measures. Strengthening policy design, enforcement, and evidence on effectiveness is critical to advance SSB control in the region.
SN - 2055-0928
ER -