Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nutrients

Pretreatment Prognostic Nutritional Index Is Associated with Treatment Response and Survival in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Receiving CAR-T Cell Therapy

  1. 1Department of Bio-Therapeutic, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  2. 2Department of Hematology, The Second Medical Center & National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China

Abstract

Background: Clinical outcomes after CAR-T therapy vary substantially in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r B-NHL), and practical markers available before infusion are still limited. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), calculated from serum albumin and absolute lymphocyte count, reflects both nutritional and immune condition. Whether pretreatment PNI has prognostic value in patients treated with TanCAR7 remains unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with r/r B-NHL who received TanCAR7, a tandem CD19/CD20-directed CAR-T product, in a single-center phase I/II trial. Pretreatment PNI was assessed using routine laboratory data obtained before lymphodepletion and infusion. Associations between PNI and treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Survival outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox regression models. Results: A total of 64 patients were included in the final analysis, including 27 patients in the low-PNI group and 37 in the high-PNI group. Patients with high pretreatment PNI had a significantly higher complete response rate (81.1% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.021) and objective response rate (89.2% vs. 63.0%, p = 0.024) than those with low pretreatment PNI. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that high pretreatment PNI was associated with longer PFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.012). In multivariable analysis, high pretreatment PNI remained associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.202, 95% CI 0.076–0.538, p = 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.217, 95% CI 0.084–0.564, p = 0.002), although these estimates should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of events and the apparent time-varying effect of PNI. Time-dependent ROC analysis showed that pretreatment PNI had better discriminative performance for shorter-term outcomes, particularly within the first 1–2 years after infusion. Conclusions: In patients with r/r B-NHL treated with TanCAR7, pretreatment PNI was associated with treatment response and survival. As a simple index derived from routine laboratory tests, PNI may help refine pretreatment risk assessment and identify patients who may benefit from closer early monitoring and supportive care. Prospective validation in larger cohorts is needed.

Related

  1. Computed tomography-based measurements of fat quality are associated with the prognostic nutritional index in gastric cancer patients
    Ryohei Nishiguchi, Shinichi Asaka, Masano Sagawa +9
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossref
  2. Treatment-dependent and independent prognostic value of inflammation-based nutritional indices in immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy for esophageal cancer
    Hiroki Matsuda, Tomoki Makino, Shuichiro Hara +12
    EsophagusPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  3. Treatment patterns and prognostic factors of radiation-associated esophageal fistula in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Children with Myeloid Leukemia Associated with Down Syndrome: A Nationwide Polish Retrospective Study
    Katarzyna Pawińska-Wąsikowska, Małgorzata Czogała, Karolina Bukowska-Strakova +28
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Prognostic value of pretreatment serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a single-center retrospective study
    Kurumi Kondo, Toyotaka Kawamata, Nobuharu Kosugi +1
    Clinical Hematology InternationalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{han2026pretreatment,
  title = {{Pretreatment Prognostic Nutritional Index Is Associated with Treatment Response and Survival in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Receiving CAR-T Cell Therapy}},
  author = {Zhengyuan Han and Yadi Zhong and Zijian Lv and Weidong Han and Yang Liu},
  journal = {Nutrients},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/nu18203425},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/20/3425},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pretreatment Prognostic Nutritional Index Is Associated with Treatment Response and Survival in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Receiving CAR-T Cell Therapy
AU  - Zhengyuan Han
AU  - Yadi Zhong
AU  - Zijian Lv
AU  - Weidong Han
AU  - Yang Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Nutrients
DO  - 10.3390/nu18203425
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/20/3425
AB  - Background: Clinical outcomes after CAR-T therapy vary substantially in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r B-NHL), and practical markers available before infusion are still limited. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), calculated from serum albumin and absolute lymphocyte count, reflects both nutritional and immune condition. Whether pretreatment PNI has prognostic value in patients treated with TanCAR7 remains unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with r/r B-NHL who received TanCAR7, a tandem CD19/CD20-directed CAR-T product, in a single-center phase I/II trial. Pretreatment PNI was assessed using routine laboratory data obtained before lymphodepletion and infusion. Associations between PNI and treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Survival outcomes were evaluated with Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox regression models. Results: A total of 64 patients were included in the final analysis, including 27 patients in the low-PNI group and 37 in the high-PNI group. Patients with high pretreatment PNI had a significantly higher complete response rate (81.1% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.021) and objective response rate (89.2% vs. 63.0%, p = 0.024) than those with low pretreatment PNI. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that high pretreatment PNI was associated with longer PFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.012). In multivariable analysis, high pretreatment PNI remained associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.202, 95% CI 0.076–0.538, p = 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.217, 95% CI 0.084–0.564, p = 0.002), although these estimates should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of events and the apparent time-varying effect of PNI. Time-dependent ROC analysis showed that pretreatment PNI had better discriminative performance for shorter-term outcomes, particularly within the first 1–2 years after infusion. Conclusions: In patients with r/r B-NHL treated with TanCAR7, pretreatment PNI was associated with treatment response and survival. As a simple index derived from routine laboratory tests, PNI may help refine pretreatment risk assessment and identify patients who may benefit from closer early monitoring and supportive care. Prospective validation in larger cohorts is needed.
SN  - 2072-6643
ER  -