Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Astrophysical Journal

What Drives Galaxy–Galaxy Differences in the Selective Attenuation Curve? New Perspectives from DESI DR1

  1. 1University of Massachusetts Amherst
  2. 2University of California,
  3. 3Siena University

Abstract

Leveraging a sample of 3457 galaxies drawn from DESI DR1 and crossmatched with archival Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) UV photometry, we construct new dust attenuation curves and measure how the shapes of these curves vary as a function of galaxy properties. Our curves are built by comparing the median flux densities of galaxies that have been divided into bins of nebular opacity, measured via the Balmer optical depth (i.e. the H α /H β ratio). When no further cuts on galaxy properties are applied, we find an attenuation curve very similar to previous work at low redshifts. We then test how the attenuation curves vary as a function of galaxy properties; stellar mass, specific star formation rate, metallicity, and ionization parameter. We find that the curve steepens significantly at higher specific star formation rate. In our data, there is not a clear link between the ionization parameter, mass, or metallicity and the attenuation curve slope.

Related

  1. Learning the Universe: The Structure of Dust Attenuation Curves in Galaxy Simulations
    Laura Sommovigo, Deaglan J. Bartlett, Rachel K. Cochrane +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  2. Shape Degeneracies: the likely culprit for the differences between lens mass models of galaxy clusters
    Liliya L. R. Williams, Derek C. Perera, Jori Liesenborgs +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyarXiv
  3. OASIS III: Bursty star formation drives observed galaxy sizes at z≥4
    William M. Baker, Tobias J. Looser, Francesco D'Eugenio +17
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
  4. An empirical derivation of the average dust attenuation law at 2<z<7
    G. Rodighiero, G. E. Esposito, D. Calzetti +12
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsGalaxiesCrossref
  5. Multiple-Mediator-Affected Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Attenuation: Hints for 5D U(1)Lμ− Lτ in IceCube
    Atri Bhattacharya, Ayushi Kaushik, Kenji Nishiwaki
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy astrophysicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{mizener2026what,
  title = {{What Drives Galaxy–Galaxy Differences in the Selective Attenuation Curve? New Perspectives from DESI DR1}},
  author = {Andrew Mizener and Daniela Calzetti and Ranga-Ram Chary and John Moustakas},
  journal = {The Astrophysical Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aea984},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aea984},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - What Drives Galaxy–Galaxy Differences in the Selective Attenuation Curve? New Perspectives from DESI DR1
AU  - Andrew Mizener
AU  - Daniela Calzetti
AU  - Ranga-Ram Chary
AU  - John Moustakas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
JO  - The Astrophysical Journal
DO  - 10.3847/1538-4357/aea984
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aea984
AB  - Leveraging a sample of 3457 galaxies drawn from DESI DR1 and crossmatched with archival Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) UV photometry, we construct new dust attenuation curves and measure how the shapes of these curves vary as a function of galaxy properties. Our curves are built by comparing the median flux densities of galaxies that have been divided into bins of nebular opacity, measured via the Balmer optical depth (i.e. the H α /H β ratio). When no further cuts on galaxy properties are applied, we find an attenuation curve very similar to previous work at low redshifts. We then test how the attenuation curves vary as a function of galaxy properties; stellar mass, specific star formation rate, metallicity, and ionization parameter. We find that the curve steepens significantly at higher specific star formation rate. In our data, there is not a clear link between the ionization parameter, mass, or metallicity and the attenuation curve slope.
SN  - 1538-4357
SN  - 0004-637X
ER  -