Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Digital and artificial intelligence-assisted medication management for older adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  1. 1School of Nursing, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize the results of randomized controlled trials to determine whether medication management approaches based on digital technologies and artificial intelligence/machine learning can indeed bring measurable clinical improvements in older adults with at least one chronic diseases.

Methods: To identify relevant RCTs, we performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and other databases from their inception through June 30, 2026, for studies of digital and AI/ML-based medication management in older adults with at least one chronic diseases. All stages of study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers, applying the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analytic pooling was conducted via RevMan 5.4.

Results: Nineteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria, of which 6 were included in the meta-analysis and 13 in the descriptive synthesis. For medication adherence, three studies reported highly heterogeneous results ( I ² = 97%), and because of this heterogeneity and the small number of studies, the data were not pooled; the individual study estimates ranged from SMD = −0.28–SMD = 1.89. For PIMs, only one study reported a comparable outcome; no pooled estimate was calculated. For hospitalization and mortality, the two included studies used different effect measures (HR and OR) and were therefore presented separately: Blum et al. reported an HR of 0.95 (95% CI 0.77–1.17), and Rieckert et al. reported an OR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.73–1.07).

Conclusion: The current body of evidence does not establish clinically meaningful benefits of digital or AI/ML-based medication management on hard endpoints such as hospitalization and mortality among older adults with at least one chronic diseases. For medication adherence, the evidence remains inconclusive and highly heterogeneous, and no reliable pooled estimate could be obtained. Given the pronounced heterogeneity and the limited pool of high-quality RCTs, current evidence is insufficient to establish clinical benefit for the routine implementation of digital or AI/ML-based medication management systems in geriatric care and further rigorously designed studies are warranted.

Systematic review registration: CRD420261460445.

Related

  1. Clinical Effectiveness, Safety, and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Insulin Management Systems in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Victória Dogani Rodrigues, Virgínia Maria Cavallari Strozze Catharin, Mauro Audi +6
    Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  2. Digital, Mobile and Artificial Intelligence‐Supported Interventions for Pressure Injury Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review of Clinical, Workflow and Implementation Outcomes
    Tuba Sengul, Fadime Koyuncu, Seda Sarıköse +2
    International wound journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Artificial intelligence for medication recognition and safety: a systematic review of detection, classification, OCR, and digital health applications
    A. Sai Sachin, J. Karthikeyan
    Frontiers in digital healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  4. Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: From Molecular Profiling to Personalized Clinical Management—A Systematic Review
    Chi-Sheng Huang, Duen-Lii Hsieh, Jin-Yu Lin +3
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for colorectal lesion detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xia Liu, Jian Qin, Yuxia Zhao +3
    BMC Medical ImagingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{cheng2026digital,
  title = {{Digital and artificial intelligence-assisted medication management for older adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials}},
  author = {Yuyan Cheng and Weidong Huang and Jianan Tian},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1956051},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1956051/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Digital and artificial intelligence-assisted medication management for older adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU  - Yuyan Cheng
AU  - Weidong Huang
AU  - Jianan Tian
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1956051
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1956051/full
AB  - Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize the results of randomized controlled trials to determine whether medication management approaches based on digital technologies and artificial intelligence/machine learning can indeed bring measurable clinical improvements in older adults with at least one chronic diseases.  Methods: To identify relevant RCTs, we performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and other databases from their inception through June 30, 2026, for studies of digital and AI/ML-based medication management in older adults with at least one chronic diseases. All stages of study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers, applying the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analytic pooling was conducted via RevMan 5.4.  Results: Nineteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria, of which 6 were included in the meta-analysis and 13 in the descriptive synthesis. For medication adherence, three studies reported highly heterogeneous results ( I ² = 97%), and because of this heterogeneity and the small number of studies, the data were not pooled; the individual study estimates ranged from SMD = −0.28–SMD = 1.89. For PIMs, only one study reported a comparable outcome; no pooled estimate was calculated. For hospitalization and mortality, the two included studies used different effect measures (HR and OR) and were therefore presented separately: Blum et al. reported an HR of 0.95 (95% CI 0.77–1.17), and Rieckert et al. reported an OR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.73–1.07).  Conclusion: The current body of evidence does not establish clinically meaningful benefits of digital or AI/ML-based medication management on hard endpoints such as hospitalization and mortality among older adults with at least one chronic diseases. For medication adherence, the evidence remains inconclusive and highly heterogeneous, and no reliable pooled estimate could be obtained. Given the pronounced heterogeneity and the limited pool of high-quality RCTs, current evidence is insufficient to establish clinical benefit for the routine implementation of digital or AI/ML-based medication management systems in geriatric care and further rigorously designed studies are warranted.  Systematic review registration: CRD420261460445.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -