Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Astrophysical Journal

From Cosmological Simulations to Binary Black Hole Mergers: The Impact of Using Analytical Star Formation History Models on Gravitational-wave Source Populations

8 affiliations
  1. 1University of California
  2. 2Johns Hopkins University
  3. 3Radboud University
  4. 4Polish Academy of Sciences
  5. 5Universität Heidelberg
  6. 6Università di Padova
  7. 7Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  8. 8Columbia University

Abstract

Observations of binary black hole (BBH) mergers provide a unique window into the lives of massive stars across cosmic time. Connecting redshift-dependent merger properties to massive star progenitors requires accurate models of cosmic star formation and chemical enrichment histories. Analytical fits for the metallicity-specific cosmic star formation rate density S ( Z , z ) are commonly used as proxies for the complex underlying star formation history, yet they remain unconstrained. Using the IllustrisTNG cosmological simulations, we evaluate the accuracy of these analytical S ( Z , z ) prescriptions. By coupling the simulated and analytical S ( Z , z ) to the population synthesis code COMPAS , we investigate the resulting BBH merger rates and mass distributions. We find that analytical S ( Z , z ) prescriptions can overestimate BBH merger rates at high redshift ( z ≳ 6) by up to a factor of 10–10 ⁴ , depending on cosmological simulation resolution, and can introduce spurious features in the BBH mass distribution. For example, they can produce an artificial feature near 8 M ⊙ in the primary mass distribution at z ≲ 2, which is absent when using the full simulation-based S ( Z , z ) , while simultaneously suppressing high-mass features. These discrepancies arise because simple analytical models fail to capture a high-metallicity bump and a more flattened low-metallicity tail in the simulated S ( Z , z ) metallicity distribution. Our results highlight the importance of accurate star formation histories for modeling BBH populations, demonstrate the limitation of widely used analytical S ( Z , z ) fits, and underscore the need for careful integration of cosmological simulations, analytical fits, and population synthesis when interpreting gravitational-wave observations.

Related

  1. Galaxy morphology dependent (black hole mass)-(velocity dispersion) relations: implications for gravitational wave forecasts and cosmological simulations
    Alister W. Graham
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  2. Comparing gravitational wave background predictions from cosmological simulations to pulsar timing observations
    Stephanie Buttigieg, Debora Sijacki, Christopher J. Moore +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesarXiv
  3. Untangling Similarities and Differences in Star Formation Histories Across Cosmological Simulations
    Alicia M. Savelli, Matthew A. Kustec, Joshua S. Speagle +5
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  4. Learning the Universe with PRFM-vol: Introducing a new subgrid model for star formation in cosmological simulations
    Jan D. Burger, Volker Springel, Eve C. Ostriker +7
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  5. Understanding the formation of alpha-Fe bimodality in the Milky Way using constrained cosmological simulations of the Local Group
    Anna Genina, Ewoud Wempe, Amina Helmi +6
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
BibTeX
@article{levina2026from,
  title = {{From Cosmological Simulations to Binary Black Hole Mergers: The Impact of Using Analytical Star Formation History Models on Gravitational-wave Source Populations}},
  author = {Sasha Levina and Floor Broekgaarden and Lieke van Son and Emanuele Berti and Amedeo Romagnolo and Ruediger Pakmor and Ana Lam},
  journal = {The Astrophysical Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ae9c2f},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ae9c2f},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - From Cosmological Simulations to Binary Black Hole Mergers: The Impact of Using Analytical Star Formation History Models on Gravitational-wave Source Populations
AU  - Sasha Levina
AU  - Floor Broekgaarden
AU  - Lieke van Son
AU  - Emanuele Berti
AU  - Amedeo Romagnolo
AU  - Ruediger Pakmor
AU  - Ana Lam
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - The Astrophysical Journal
DO  - 10.3847/1538-4357/ae9c2f
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ae9c2f
AB  - Observations of binary black hole (BBH) mergers provide a unique window into the lives of massive stars across cosmic time. Connecting redshift-dependent merger properties to massive star progenitors requires accurate models of cosmic star formation and chemical enrichment histories. Analytical fits for the metallicity-specific cosmic star formation rate density S ( Z , z ) are commonly used as proxies for the complex underlying star formation history, yet they remain unconstrained. Using the IllustrisTNG cosmological simulations, we evaluate the accuracy of these analytical S ( Z , z ) prescriptions. By coupling the simulated and analytical S ( Z , z ) to the population synthesis code COMPAS , we investigate the resulting BBH merger rates and mass distributions. We find that analytical S ( Z , z ) prescriptions can overestimate BBH merger rates at high redshift ( z ≳ 6) by up to a factor of 10–10 ⁴ , depending on cosmological simulation resolution, and can introduce spurious features in the BBH mass distribution. For example, they can produce an artificial feature near 8 M ⊙ in the primary mass distribution at z ≲ 2, which is absent when using the full simulation-based S ( Z , z ) , while simultaneously suppressing high-mass features. These discrepancies arise because simple analytical models fail to capture a high-metallicity bump and a more flattened low-metallicity tail in the simulated S ( Z , z ) metallicity distribution. Our results highlight the importance of accurate star formation histories for modeling BBH populations, demonstrate the limitation of widely used analytical S ( Z , z ) fits, and underscore the need for careful integration of cosmological simulations, analytical fits, and population synthesis when interpreting gravitational-wave observations.
SN  - 0004-637X
SN  - 1538-4357
ER  -