Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences

Confidence-gated temporal voting for EMG-based prosthetic arm control: a low-cost end-to-end pipeline with quantified rejection behaviour.

  1. 1School of Engineering and Science, MIT ADT Campus, MIT Art, Design and Technology University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
  2. 2K. J. Somaiya School of Engineering, Somaiya Vidyavihar University, Mumbai, India.

Abstract

Background

Surface electromyography (sEMG) is the dominant non-invasive route to volitional prosthetic control, but a closed-world classifier issues a command for every input, including inputs corresponding to no trained gesture. This study evaluated a low-cost, three-gesture sEMG control pipeline combining a Random Forest classifier with rejection on the maximum Random-Forest class probability and temporal majority voting, and measured the resulting rejection behaviour rather than assuming it.Methods

Three data sources were analysed: modelled synthetic sEMG; Ninapro DB5 (10 subjects, 16 channels at 200 Hz, documented three-channel subset); and live three-channel sEMG from 13 healthy limb-intact adults recorded over three sessions with MyoWare sensors spaced equally around the forearm flexor group. Each of the 117 recordings lasted 120 s, comprising a 60 s continuous phase and four 10 s sustained contractions separated by 5 s of rest, yielding 21,294 windows of which 4,212 were rest. Channel interleaving gave an effective 333.3 Hz per channel. All datasets were segmented in physical time (0.6 s window, 0.2 s overlap) without resampling, and four time-domain features (MAV, RMS, WL, ZC) were classified by a 100-tree Random Forest. Evaluation used repetition-level, cross-session and leave-one-participant-out (LOPO) splits, with calibration and threshold selection confined to a participant-disjoint partition. Models were trained and tested within each domain, so the three accuracies index benchmark difficulty rather than transfer.Results

LOPO accuracy was 80.2% (synthetic), 74.5% (DB5) and 80.2% (live). The pooled window-level split used originally overestimated live accuracy by 7.7 percentage points. Expected calibration error was 0.147 uncalibrated and 0.038 after Platt scaling. Open-set AUROC was 0.842 against rest, 0.784 under electrode displacement and 0.741 for held-out movements, and 7.4% of windows were confidently incorrect. The complete pipeline reduced false actuation from 19.80% to 5.00% and command switching from 0.16 to 0.02 s-1 , while rejecting 18.40% of windows and raising median latency from 0.60 to 1.95 s. The prototype completed 12 of 15 benchtop trials.Conclusion

The results support a benchtop engineering proof of concept with quantified rejection and latency behaviour, not clinical safety or deployment readiness.

Related

  1. MRCER-DR: Multi-Representation Confidence Entropy Rejection for IoT Open-Set Intrusion Detection
    Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  2. Proactive early invisible spoilage-risk prediction through uncertainty-quantified temporal microbial growth intelligence
    Mansi Alsmarah, D. David Neels Ponkumar, Refga Abdallah Eltieb Elebeed +1
    Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyNutritionDOAJ
  3. Similar discrimination, different behaviour under synthetic occlusion: confidence and attribution reproducibility of deep learning models for intraoral ultrasonography
    G. Jung, Y.-R. Heo, K.-S. Hu +1
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  4. Bayesian Confidence Recalibration and Research-Equilibrium Criticality: Temporal Support in Robust Portfolios
    Han Yanç
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Transformer-aided guard: A hybrid spatio-temporal framework for confidence-aware intrusion detection in cyber-physical systems
    Abeer Aljohani
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceGeneral mathematicsPLOSPMC
BibTeX
@article{shinde2026confidencegated,
  title = {{Confidence-gated temporal voting for EMG-based prosthetic arm control: a low-cost end-to-end pipeline with quantified rejection behaviour.}},
  author = {Anagha Shinde and Virendra Shete and Ninad Mehendale},
  journal = {Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fresc.2026.1864998},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909049},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Confidence-gated temporal voting for EMG-based prosthetic arm control: a low-cost end-to-end pipeline with quantified rejection behaviour.
AU  - Anagha Shinde
AU  - Virendra Shete
AU  - Ninad Mehendale
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences
DO  - 10.3389/fresc.2026.1864998
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909049
AB  - Background  Surface electromyography (sEMG) is the dominant non-invasive route to volitional prosthetic control, but a closed-world classifier issues a command for every input, including inputs corresponding to no trained gesture. This study evaluated a low-cost, three-gesture sEMG control pipeline combining a Random Forest classifier with rejection on the maximum Random-Forest class probability and temporal majority voting, and measured the resulting rejection behaviour rather than assuming it.Methods  Three data sources were analysed: modelled synthetic sEMG; Ninapro DB5 (10 subjects, 16 channels at 200 Hz, documented three-channel subset); and live three-channel sEMG from 13 healthy limb-intact adults recorded over three sessions with MyoWare sensors spaced equally around the forearm flexor group. Each of the 117 recordings lasted 120 s, comprising a 60 s continuous phase and four 10 s sustained contractions separated by 5 s of rest, yielding 21,294 windows of which 4,212 were rest. Channel interleaving gave an effective 333.3 Hz per channel. All datasets were segmented in physical time (0.6 s window, 0.2 s overlap) without resampling, and four time-domain features (MAV, RMS, WL, ZC) were classified by a 100-tree Random Forest. Evaluation used repetition-level, cross-session and leave-one-participant-out (LOPO) splits, with calibration and threshold selection confined to a participant-disjoint partition. Models were trained and tested within each domain, so the three accuracies index benchmark difficulty rather than transfer.Results  LOPO accuracy was 80.2% (synthetic), 74.5% (DB5) and 80.2% (live). The pooled window-level split used originally overestimated live accuracy by 7.7 percentage points. Expected calibration error was 0.147 uncalibrated and 0.038 after Platt scaling. Open-set AUROC was 0.842 against rest, 0.784 under electrode displacement and 0.741 for held-out movements, and 7.4% of windows were confidently incorrect. The complete pipeline reduced false actuation from 19.80% to 5.00% and command switching from 0.16 to 0.02 s-1 , while rejecting 18.40% of windows and raising median latency from 0.60 to 1.95 s. The prototype completed 12 of 15 benchtop trials.Conclusion  The results support a benchtop engineering proof of concept with quantified rejection and latency behaviour, not clinical safety or deployment readiness.
SN  - 2673-6861
ER  -