Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Nutrition

Mediterranean diet and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

  1. 1Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men worldwide. In addition to non-modifiable risk factors, modifiable lifestyle factors are increasingly recognized in prevention. The Mediterranean diet (Med Diet), characterized by high intake of plant-based foods, unsaturated fatty acids, and antioxidant micronutrients, has been proposed as a protective dietary pattern.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus examining associations between Mediterranean diet adherence and prostate cancer risk. Fourteen studies met eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed in R applying a random-effects model (REML estimation; Hartung–Knapp adjustment). Heterogeneity was assessed with I² and τ²; publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot, contour-enhanced funnel plot, and Egger’s test.

Results: Based on a random effects model, we did not find a statistically significant difference in risk of prostate cancer in men with high versus low Mediterranean diet adherence (RR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.93–1.04). Heterogeneity was moderate (Q = 19.95, I² = 34.8%). Although Egger’s regression test did not indicate statistically significant publication bias (p = 0.115), complementary analyses (Q-Q plot and limit meta-analysis) suggested a possible small-study effect, warranting cautious interpretation.

Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, no protective effect of the Mediterranean diet against prostate cancer was found. Nevertheless, biological plausibility and inconsistent epidemiological trends suggest that further research using standardized dietary assessments and incorporating genetic and microbiome-related factors is needed.

Trial registration: The review protocol was not prospectively registered.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01544-5.

Related

  1. Association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and risk of sarcopenia: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Chenping Xi, Jiaqi Wang, Xiaolin Liu +3
    BMC nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. Tooth wear and socioeconomic status in childhood and adulthood: Findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Sheema Entezami, Karen Glazer Peres, Huihua Li +3
    Journal of DentistryPeer-reviewedLicence not stated24 citedGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  3. Dietary patterns and adult mental health: a systematic review of observational studies
    Elaine Valdna Oliveira dos Santos, Lucas de Almeida Moura, Camila Valdejane Silva de Souza +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Impact of diabetes with and without neuropathy on plantar pressure, kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity during gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Isabel C. N. Sacco, Carla B. Rodrigues, Ronaldo H. Cruvinel-Júnior +1
    Systematic ReviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  5. Association Between Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery and Melanoma Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies
    Túlio Pimentel, Maria Clara Florêncio, Mariano Gallo Ruelas +4
    Obesity SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
BibTeX
@article{jahnke2026mediterranean,
  title = {{Mediterranean diet and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies}},
  author = {Tom Thabo Jahnke and Christian Holschuh and Peter Schlattmann},
  journal = {BMC Nutrition},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1186/s40795-026-01544-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01544-5},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Mediterranean diet and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
AU  - Tom Thabo Jahnke
AU  - Christian Holschuh
AU  - Peter Schlattmann
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - BMC Nutrition
DO  - 10.1186/s40795-026-01544-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01544-5
AB  - Background: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men worldwide. In addition to non-modifiable risk factors, modifiable lifestyle factors are increasingly recognized in prevention. The Mediterranean diet (Med Diet), characterized by high intake of plant-based foods, unsaturated fatty acids, and antioxidant micronutrients, has been proposed as a protective dietary pattern.  Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus examining associations between Mediterranean diet adherence and prostate cancer risk. Fourteen studies met eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed in R applying a random-effects model (REML estimation; Hartung–Knapp adjustment). Heterogeneity was assessed with I² and τ²; publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot, contour-enhanced funnel plot, and Egger’s test.  Results: Based on a random effects model, we did not find a statistically significant difference in risk of prostate cancer in men with high versus low Mediterranean diet adherence (RR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.93–1.04). Heterogeneity was moderate (Q = 19.95, I² = 34.8%). Although Egger’s regression test did not indicate statistically significant publication bias (p = 0.115), complementary analyses (Q-Q plot and limit meta-analysis) suggested a possible small-study effect, warranting cautious interpretation.  Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, no protective effect of the Mediterranean diet against prostate cancer was found. Nevertheless, biological plausibility and inconsistent epidemiological trends suggest that further research using standardized dietary assessments and incorporating genetic and microbiome-related factors is needed.  Trial registration: The review protocol was not prospectively registered.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01544-5.
SN  - 2055-0928
ER  -