PreprintCC0arXiv
Near-Optimal Convex Optimization with Lazy Second-Order Oracles
Abstract
This paper studies the complexity of convex optimization using lazy second-order oracles (Doikov, Chayti, and Jaggi, ICML 2023), where an algorithm queries gradients every iteration and Hessians once per m iterations. Under this setting, we show a lower bound of Ω(m+ m1/7 ε−2/7) on the number of total iterations to find an ε-solution using a novel block zero-chain construction. Then we propose a novel method that achieves a new upper bound of 𝒪̃(m+ m1/7 ε−2/7), which significantly improves the prior one (Chen, Liu, Luo, and Zhang, COLT 2026) of 𝒪̃(m+ m13/21 ε−2/7) and is tight up to logarithmic factors.
Related
- Near-Optimal Second-Order Convex Finite-Sum Optimization under Individual Smoothness
- Descending Everest with First-Order Oracles: Oracle Complexity of Convex Optimization under (L0,L1)-Smoothness
- Optimal Stochastic Bilevel Optimization with First-Order Oracles
- Distributed Convex Second-Order Optimization for AC/DC Hybrid Distribution Systems within PROcess Orchestration Framework
- Near-Optimal Acceleration for Smooth ℓp / ℓq Nondual Convex First-Order Oracle Optimization
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026nearoptimal,
title = {{Near-Optimal Convex Optimization with Lazy Second-Order Oracles}},
author = {Xinliang Zhang and Lesi Chen and Chengchang Liu and Jingzhao Zhang},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.03222},
eprint = {2610.03222},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03222},
note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Near-Optimal Convex Optimization with Lazy Second-Order Oracles
AU - Xinliang Zhang
AU - Lesi Chen
AU - Chengchang Liu
AU - Jingzhao Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.03222
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03222
AB - This paper studies the complexity of convex optimization using lazy second-order oracles (Doikov, Chayti, and Jaggi, ICML 2023), where an algorithm queries gradients every iteration and Hessians once per m iterations. Under this setting, we show a lower bound of Ω(m+ m^1/7 ε^−2/7) on the number of total iterations to find an ε-solution using a novel block zero-chain construction. Then we propose a novel method that achieves a new upper bound of 𝒪̃(m+ m^1/7 ε^−2/7), which significantly improves the prior one (Chen, Liu, Luo, and Zhang, COLT 2026) of 𝒪̃(m+ m^13/21 ε^−2/7) and is tight up to logarithmic factors.
ER -