PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
Indemnification Clause Review 2026: Policy Guide for 90% vs 95% Auto-Accept Threshold
Abstract
Keep the 2026 indemnification-clause auto-accept threshold at 90%; route the 90-95% confidence band to human review before raising global threshold to 95%.
Independent technical note mirroring the canonical version: https://lawr.io/blog/indemnification-clause-review-2026-policy-guide-for-90-vs-95-auto-accept-threshold.php
Related
- Optimality of Threshold Policies for Heat Storage Optimization and a Policy Gradient Algorithm
- A Shared Threshold Rule for Ants and Workers: Multi-Objective Design of Labour-Force Participation Policy and a Division-of-Labour Evolutionary Algorithm.
- Contract clause extraction: CUAD (Contract Understanding Atticus Dataset) 510: Regex Wins
- LMS switching costs: SCORM 1.2 vs xAPI and the exit clause to demand
- Bipolar Fuzzy Minimum-Weight Satisfiability under Continuous t-Norms: A Clause-Witness Branch-and-Bound Framework
BibTeX
@misc{fletcher2026indemnification,
title = {{Indemnification Clause Review 2026: Policy Guide for 90% vs 95% Auto-Accept Threshold}},
author = {Natalie Fletcher},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23602106},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23602106},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Indemnification Clause Review 2026: Policy Guide for 90% vs 95% Auto-Accept Threshold
AU - Natalie Fletcher
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23602106
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23602106
AB - Keep the 2026 indemnification-clause auto-accept threshold at 90%; route the 90-95% confidence band to human review before raising global threshold to 95%. Independent technical note mirroring the canonical version: https://lawr.io/blog/indemnification-clause-review-2026-policy-guide-for-90-vs-95-auto-accept-threshold.php
ER -