Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,787 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

The efficacy-competitiveness frontier in the Swiss system

Abstract

An ideal tournament is both efficacious and attractive: it selects the best player as the winner, but only at the end of the tournament in order to maintain suspense as long as possible. We identify and explore the trade-off between these criteria in Swiss-system chess team tournaments via simulations. Organising more rounds is shown to improve efficacy but increase the probability of a stakeless last round. The 2008 reform in the Chess Olympiad ranking is found to be a questionable move, as the previous rule based on board points determines the efficacy-competitiveness frontier, regardless of whether two or three points are awarded for winning a match. Combining board points and match points is better than using match points only. Our results can help optimise the design of the Swiss system, which, besides chess, is also widely used in e-sports.

Related

  1. Uniqueness and tube property for the Swiss cheese large deviations
    Julien Poisat, Dirk Erhard
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textProbabilityHAL
  2. Swiss-Knife: A Framework for Reconfigurable Externalised Multi-Objective Alignment at Decode Time
    Agnibh Karmakar, Mayur Parvatikar, Shreyash Dhoot +5
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. The Mathematician Leads: Building a Research Profile in the Age of Frontier AI
    Helmut H. W. Hofer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Simultaneous Recovery of Wave Speeds and Initial Sources on Graphs via Redundant Frontier Propagation
    Amir Moradifam, Oliver P. Waite
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Learning a Size-Weight Frontier for Synthetic-Augmented Inference
    Chengpiao Huang, Kaizheng Wang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{csato2026efficacycompetitiveness,
  title = {{The efficacy-competitiveness frontier in the Swiss system}},
  author = {László Csató and Balázs R. Sziklai},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.01997},
  eprint = {2610.01997},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01997},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The efficacy-competitiveness frontier in the Swiss system
AU  - László Csató
AU  - Balázs R. Sziklai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.01997
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01997
AB  - An ideal tournament is both efficacious and attractive: it selects the best player as the winner, but only at the end of the tournament in order to maintain suspense as long as possible. We identify and explore the trade-off between these criteria in Swiss-system chess team tournaments via simulations. Organising more rounds is shown to improve efficacy but increase the probability of a stakeless last round. The 2008 reform in the Chess Olympiad ranking is found to be a questionable move, as the previous rule based on board points determines the efficacy-competitiveness frontier, regardless of whether two or three points are awarded for winning a match. Combining board points and match points is better than using match points only. Our results can help optimise the design of the Swiss system, which, besides chess, is also widely used in e-sports.
ER  -