Disrupting antimicrobial resistance in food systems from a One Health perspective: A complex systems analysis in Canada, Senegal and the Netherlands
Abstract
Background: Food systems are a key contributor to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Given the multi-sectoral nature of AMR, a One Health perspective has been advocated. Recent research situates AMR as an emerging property of a complex system, a perspective which can help identify root drivers of AMR and theorise the impacts of proposed solutions. This study aims to combine systems modelling and a One Health perspective to identify system-level dynamics and priority actions for addressing AMR in food systems. Methods: We used group model building, a participatory approach to systems modelling, in three countries: Canada, Senegal, and the Netherlands. Stakeholders from policy, research, civil society and industry developed qualitative systems models and identified priority actions for AMR mitigation. Workshop outputs were synthesised in the form of causal loop diagrams and iteratively refined with stakeholders to ensure they appropriately reflected their perspectives. Diagrams were analysed using systems archetypes, a conceptual tool for diagnosing recurring dynamics in complex systems, to identify common structural drivers of AMR and potential intervention points across countries. We then drew on systems theory and the priority actions identified by stakeholders to highlight potential paths to disrupting these archetypes, thereby reducing the contribution of food systems to AMR. Results: Across the countries, 39 stakeholders participated in workshops. The archetypes analysis highlighted how short-term exploitation of shared resources, reliance on antimicrobials at the expense of investing in alternative solutions, and dominance of antimicrobial-intensive production systems may contribute to AMR. Priority actions that were positioned to disrupt these archetypes included regulation, education, consumer engagement, and shift towards different production systems. Conclusions: AMR in food systems arises from recurring structural dynamics that require context-appropriate, systems-informed solutions. Countering short-term exploitation of shared antimicrobial resources calls for regulation, surveillance and education. Addressing overreliance on antimicrobials requires balanced strategies pairing judicious use with sustained investment in alternatives such as livestock management, infection prevention and vaccination. Disrupting the dominance of antimicrobial-intensive production systems calls for regulatory measures and consumer pressure to level the playing field with lower-use systems. Together, these findings point to solutions that employ a systems perspective on design, implementation and evaluation to enable long-term effectiveness in AMR mitigation.
Related
- Editorial: Evolution of antimicrobial resistance in intracellular bacterial pathogens: a genomic and historical perspective
- Antimicrobial resistance at the animal / environment interface: phenotypic detection and persistence of ESBL and carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales in Irish cattle systems
- Phage-Inducible Chromosomal Jumbo Islands (PICJIs) spreading antimicrobial resistance, host-adaptation factors and defense systems, a novel satellite family of nucleus-forming Chimalliviridae
- The Pseudomonas protegens PBL3 secretome exerts antimicrobial activity against Burkholderia glumae by disrupting cell envelope homeostasis and impairing bacterial replication
- Feed additives as systems-level modulators of the ruminant host–microbiome interaction: a multi-omics perspective on efficiency, resistance, and reproduction
BibTeX
@article{astbury2026disrupting,
title = {{Disrupting antimicrobial resistance in food systems from a One Health perspective: A complex systems analysis in Canada, Senegal and the Netherlands}},
author = {Chloe Clifford Astbury and Catherine Hu and Mouhamadou Moustapha Sow and Mamadou Ciss and Michel Dückers and Caroline Schneeberger and Lotte van Heuvel and Cécile Aenishaenslin and Ria Benko and Marion Bordier Bouchot and Valentina de Leon and Olivier Kambere Kavulikirwa and Eva Loboda and Arabi Rajan and Arne Ruckert and Sharon Villanueva and Mary Wiktorowicz and Tarra L. Penney},
journal = {BMC Global and Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s44263-026-00322-6},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05796359v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Disrupting antimicrobial resistance in food systems from a One Health perspective: A complex systems analysis in Canada, Senegal and the Netherlands
AU - Chloe Clifford Astbury
AU - Catherine Hu
AU - Mouhamadou Moustapha Sow
AU - Mamadou Ciss
AU - Michel Dückers
AU - Caroline Schneeberger
AU - Lotte van Heuvel
AU - Cécile Aenishaenslin
AU - Ria Benko
AU - Marion Bordier Bouchot
AU - Valentina de Leon
AU - Olivier Kambere Kavulikirwa
AU - Eva Loboda
AU - Arabi Rajan
AU - Arne Ruckert
AU - Sharon Villanueva
AU - Mary Wiktorowicz
AU - Tarra L. Penney
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
JO - BMC Global and Public Health
DO - 10.1186/s44263-026-00322-6
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05796359v1
AB - Background: Food systems are a key contributor to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Given the multi-sectoral nature of AMR, a One Health perspective has been advocated. Recent research situates AMR as an emerging property of a complex system, a perspective which can help identify root drivers of AMR and theorise the impacts of proposed solutions. This study aims to combine systems modelling and a One Health perspective to identify system-level dynamics and priority actions for addressing AMR in food systems. Methods: We used group model building, a participatory approach to systems modelling, in three countries: Canada, Senegal, and the Netherlands. Stakeholders from policy, research, civil society and industry developed qualitative systems models and identified priority actions for AMR mitigation. Workshop outputs were synthesised in the form of causal loop diagrams and iteratively refined with stakeholders to ensure they appropriately reflected their perspectives. Diagrams were analysed using systems archetypes, a conceptual tool for diagnosing recurring dynamics in complex systems, to identify common structural drivers of AMR and potential intervention points across countries. We then drew on systems theory and the priority actions identified by stakeholders to highlight potential paths to disrupting these archetypes, thereby reducing the contribution of food systems to AMR. Results: Across the countries, 39 stakeholders participated in workshops. The archetypes analysis highlighted how short-term exploitation of shared resources, reliance on antimicrobials at the expense of investing in alternative solutions, and dominance of antimicrobial-intensive production systems may contribute to AMR. Priority actions that were positioned to disrupt these archetypes included regulation, education, consumer engagement, and shift towards different production systems. Conclusions: AMR in food systems arises from recurring structural dynamics that require context-appropriate, systems-informed solutions. Countering short-term exploitation of shared antimicrobial resources calls for regulation, surveillance and education. Addressing overreliance on antimicrobials requires balanced strategies pairing judicious use with sustained investment in alternatives such as livestock management, infection prevention and vaccination. Disrupting the dominance of antimicrobial-intensive production systems calls for regulatory measures and consumer pressure to level the playing field with lower-use systems. Together, these findings point to solutions that employ a systems perspective on design, implementation and evaluation to enable long-term effectiveness in AMR mitigation.
SN - 2731-913X
ER -