Sensorimotor rehabilitation and changes in upper limb function after acute cervical spinal disorders: a retrospective case series (n = 14)
6 affiliations
- 1Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
- 2Unidade Local de Saude de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
- 3Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing (FCSE), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
- 4Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- 5Nursing Department, Escola Superior de Saúde Atlântica, Barcarena, Portugal
- 6Comprehensive Health Research Centre, Polo de Évora, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal
Abstract
Background: Upper limb impairment is a common consequence of acute cervical spinal disorders and can substantially compromise functional independence, highlighting the need for rehabilitation strategies that address sensorimotor and functional impairments.
Objective: To describe changes in upper limb function following a sensorimotor intervention incorporating a viscoelastic product in individuals with acute non-degenerative cervical spinal disorders.
Design: Uncontrolled, before and after, observational retrospective longitudinal case series study with no comparator group, conducted over a 14-month period.
Setting: Surgical inpatient unit.
Participants: Fourteen participants with acute non-degenerative cervical spinal disorders receiving a rehabilitation nursing programme, with heterogeneous underlying diagnoses including disc herniation, fracture, space-occupying lesion, myelopathy, and spinal cord trauma.
Main measures: Spasticity assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale, upper limb muscle strength assessed using the Medical Research Council Muscle Scale, and functional independence assessed using the Barthel Index.
Results: Statistically significant changes in spasticity were observed between baseline and discharge (Z = −3.093; p < .001; r = 0.83), together with significant changes in muscle strength across all assessed upper extremity segments: fingers (Z = −3.330; p < .001; r = 0.89), wrist (Z = −3.324; p < .001; r = 0.89), forearm (Z = −2.953; p < .001; r = 0.79), elbow (Z = −3.084; p < .001; r = 0.82), and shoulder (Z = −2.555; p = .008; r = 0.68), as well as in functional independence (Z = −3.297; p < .001; r = 0.88).
Conclusions: Changes in spasticity, upper limb muscle strength and functional independence were observed between baseline and discharge. Given the uncontrolled retrospective case-series design and absence of a control or comparison group, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as they cannot be attributed specifically to the intervention and should be considered hypothesis-generating for future research. Further prospective controlled studies are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach.
Related
- Changes in hepatic functional reserve and renal function during hospitalization in patients with chronic liver disease : A retrospective observational study of inpatient rehabilitation
- Postoperative Analgesic and Rehabilitation Outcomes After Implementation of a Kampo Plus Acetaminophen Pathway for Cervical Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Historical Control Study
- Multidomain Polysomnographic Abnormalities in Cervical Dystonia: REM Suppression, Respiratory Instability, and Sensorimotor Dysregulation
- Changing Case‐Mix and Inpatient Rehabilitation Costs in C4/C5 Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A 10‐Year Single‐Center Study From a National Rehabilitation Center in China
- Psychosocial Rehabilitation Interventions for Mental Health Disorders: A Systematic Review.
BibTeX
@article{agostinho2026sensorimotor,
title = {{Sensorimotor rehabilitation and changes in upper limb function after acute cervical spinal disorders: a retrospective case series (n = 14)}},
author = {Inês Margarida Oliveira Agostinho and Ana Temudo and Sérgio Manuel Oliveira Gonçalves Bacelo and Ricardo Picoito and Rafael Bernardes and Luís Sousa},
journal = {Frontiers in Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1958604},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1958604},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Sensorimotor rehabilitation and changes in upper limb function after acute cervical spinal disorders: a retrospective case series (n = 14)
AU - Inês Margarida Oliveira Agostinho
AU - Ana Temudo
AU - Sérgio Manuel Oliveira Gonçalves Bacelo
AU - Ricardo Picoito
AU - Rafael Bernardes
AU - Luís Sousa
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Frontiers in Medicine
DO - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1958604
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1958604
AB - Background: Upper limb impairment is a common consequence of acute cervical spinal disorders and can substantially compromise functional independence, highlighting the need for rehabilitation strategies that address sensorimotor and functional impairments. Objective: To describe changes in upper limb function following a sensorimotor intervention incorporating a viscoelastic product in individuals with acute non-degenerative cervical spinal disorders. Design: Uncontrolled, before and after, observational retrospective longitudinal case series study with no comparator group, conducted over a 14-month period. Setting: Surgical inpatient unit. Participants: Fourteen participants with acute non-degenerative cervical spinal disorders receiving a rehabilitation nursing programme, with heterogeneous underlying diagnoses including disc herniation, fracture, space-occupying lesion, myelopathy, and spinal cord trauma. Main measures: Spasticity assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale, upper limb muscle strength assessed using the Medical Research Council Muscle Scale, and functional independence assessed using the Barthel Index. Results: Statistically significant changes in spasticity were observed between baseline and discharge (Z = −3.093; p < .001; r = 0.83), together with significant changes in muscle strength across all assessed upper extremity segments: fingers (Z = −3.330; p < .001; r = 0.89), wrist (Z = −3.324; p < .001; r = 0.89), forearm (Z = −2.953; p < .001; r = 0.79), elbow (Z = −3.084; p < .001; r = 0.82), and shoulder (Z = −2.555; p = .008; r = 0.68), as well as in functional independence (Z = −3.297; p < .001; r = 0.88). Conclusions: Changes in spasticity, upper limb muscle strength and functional independence were observed between baseline and discharge. Given the uncontrolled retrospective case-series design and absence of a control or comparison group, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as they cannot be attributed specifically to the intervention and should be considered hypothesis-generating for future research. Further prospective controlled studies are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach.
SN - 2296-858X
ER -