Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJTCVS open

Mitral repair for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy.

  1. 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Abstract

Objectives

For patients with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the indications for concomitant repair of moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) remain controversial. This study evaluated outcomes of concomitant mitral valve repair (MVr) for moderate ischemic MR in patients with advanced left ventricular (LV) remodeling and severely impaired LV function undergoing CABG.Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 341 patients (mean age, 67 ± 9 years) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (LV ejection fraction, ≤40%) and less-than-severe MR who underwent CABG. Of these, 108 (32%) underwent concomitant MVr for clinically relevant moderate MR, and 233 (68%) underwent CABG alone for mild or absent MR. All patients had a prior myocardial infarction. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included postoperative changes in MR grade and LV function at 1 year. Median follow-up was 4.5 years (interquartile range, 2.4-7.3 years).Results

Despite higher preoperative surgical risk in the CABG + MVr group (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score, 6.7% vs 2.9%; P < .001), 30-day mortality did not differ between groups (1.9% vs 2.1%; P = .88). Five-year overall survival was 73% versus 77% (log-rank P = .25). At 1 year, the CABG + MVr group demonstrated greater LV reverse remodeling (median LV end-diastolic volume index reduction: -26% vs -19%; P = .001), higher LV ejection fraction (46 ± 13% vs 42 ± 12%; P = .044), and a lower prevalence of significant MR (6% vs 13%; P = .032).Conclusions

In patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy and moderate MR, concomitant MVr can be performed with acceptable operative risk and promotes superior LV reverse remodeling. Long-term survival was comparable to patients with nonsignificant MR who did not require mitral intervention, suggesting that targeted mitral repair may normalize the adverse prognostic influence of moderate ischemic MR.

Related

  1. Influence of concomitant mitral valve intervention on late survival in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing surgical revascularization.
    Sameer K Singh, Arnar Geirsson, Ernest Traad +2
    JTCVS openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Dynamic Changes and Prognostic Impact of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in Recurrent Myocardial Infarction
    Chiharu Nishino, Shun Nishino, Akihiro Hayashida +7
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  3. Atrial Cardiomyopathy and Ischemic Stroke: A Monitoring-Integrated Staging and Phenotyping Framework Beyond Atrial Fibrillation
    Ye Cao, Qunxiong Fan, Qing Hao +1
    Reviews in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  4. Recurrent multiterritorial ischemic stroke with persistent moderate hypereosinophilia: A case report with focused literature review
    Yu Wang, Na Liu, Ju Zhu
    The Journal of International Medical ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Familial severe non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with coexisting likely pathogenic BAG3 and FLNC variants: a case report
    Wang Lili, Wang Youcao, Yao Xiaodong +1
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cardiovascular medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{misumi2026mitral,
  title = {{Mitral repair for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy.}},
  author = {Yusuke Misumi and Daisuke Yoshioka and Shin Yajima and Takuji Kawamura and Ai Kawamura and Kazuma Handa and Akinobu Ohtani and Shunsuke Saito and Kazuo Shimamura and Shigeru Miyagawa},
  journal = {JTCVS open},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1016/j.xjon.2026.101963},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948419},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Mitral repair for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy.
AU  - Yusuke Misumi
AU  - Daisuke Yoshioka
AU  - Shin Yajima
AU  - Takuji Kawamura
AU  - Ai Kawamura
AU  - Kazuma Handa
AU  - Akinobu Ohtani
AU  - Shunsuke Saito
AU  - Kazuo Shimamura
AU  - Shigeru Miyagawa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/10
JO  - JTCVS open
DO  - 10.1016/j.xjon.2026.101963
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948419
AB  - Objectives  For patients with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the indications for concomitant repair of moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) remain controversial. This study evaluated outcomes of concomitant mitral valve repair (MVr) for moderate ischemic MR in patients with advanced left ventricular (LV) remodeling and severely impaired LV function undergoing CABG.Methods  We retrospectively reviewed 341 patients (mean age, 67 ± 9 years) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (LV ejection fraction, ≤40%) and less-than-severe MR who underwent CABG. Of these, 108 (32%) underwent concomitant MVr for clinically relevant moderate MR, and 233 (68%) underwent CABG alone for mild or absent MR. All patients had a prior myocardial infarction. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included postoperative changes in MR grade and LV function at 1 year. Median follow-up was 4.5 years (interquartile range, 2.4-7.3 years).Results  Despite higher preoperative surgical risk in the CABG + MVr group (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score, 6.7% vs 2.9%; P < .001), 30-day mortality did not differ between groups (1.9% vs 2.1%; P = .88). Five-year overall survival was 73% versus 77% (log-rank P = .25). At 1 year, the CABG + MVr group demonstrated greater LV reverse remodeling (median LV end-diastolic volume index reduction: -26% vs -19%; P = .001), higher LV ejection fraction (46 ± 13% vs 42 ± 12%; P = .044), and a lower prevalence of significant MR (6% vs 13%; P = .032).Conclusions  In patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy and moderate MR, concomitant MVr can be performed with acceptable operative risk and promotes superior LV reverse remodeling. Long-term survival was comparable to patients with nonsignificant MR who did not require mitral intervention, suggesting that targeted mitral repair may normalize the adverse prognostic influence of moderate ischemic MR.
SN  - 2666-2736
ER  -