Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Brain and Behavior

Efficacy of High‐Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Depression With Insomnia Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

  1. 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Guangzhou First People Hospital Guangzhou Guangdong China
  2. 2Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Guangzhou Guangdong China
  3. 3Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College Guangzhou Guangdong China

Abstract

Background: This meta‐analysis evaluated the efficacy of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF‐rTMS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in patients with comorbid depression and insomnia.

Methods: This analysis incorporated 7 studies, involving 709 subjects (control: 342; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS]: 367). All included studies employed left DLPFC‐targeted HF‐rTMS. Treatment effectiveness for comorbid depression and insomnia was assessed. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore possible sources of heterogeneity.

Results: HF‐rTMS significantly improved sleep quality (standardized mean difference [SMD] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.97 [0.23 to 1.71], p = 0.01) and depressive symptoms (0.61 [0.38 to 0.84], p < 0.00001). There was a non‐significant trend toward reduced sleep latency (0.50 [−0.17 to 1.18], p = 0.14). No significant difference in adverse reactions was observed (risk ratio [95% CI]: 1.09 [0.80 to 1.48], p = 0.57). Substantial heterogeneity was identified for the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index outcomes (I 2 = 91%). Subgroup analyses indicated that this heterogeneity was attributed to variations in stimulation frequency and baseline antidepressant use.

Conclusion: Very‑low to low certainty evidence suggests that left DLPFC‑targeted HF‑rTMS may improve sleep quality and depressive symptoms in patients with depression and insomnia symptoms, with a favorable safety profile. However, due to substantial heterogeneity and methodological limitations, these findings should be considered exploratory and warrant confirmation by future high‑quality trials.

Related

  1. Copenhagen Magnetic Personalized Accelerated Brain Circuit Therapy (CoMPACT) trial: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, three-armed, parallel-group trial of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
    Armita Faghani Jadidi, Iman Ibrahim, Lasse Christiansen +10
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Fronto-temporal transcranial direct current stimulation reduces symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a randomized sham-controlled trial
    Milad Kadkhoda, Behnam Ghabel Damirchi, Fatemeh Sadat Raeisian +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  3. Optimizing motor functions in incomplete spinal cord injury with simultaneous application of transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality assisted treadmill training: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial {1a}
    Garima Wadhwa, Pooja Anand, Priyanka Rishi
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  4. Rapid and robust effects of high-dose intermittent Transcranial Brain Stimulation (iTBS) on depression and suicidal ideation in adolescents with acute major depression: a 10-day randomised, controlled, single-blind trial.
    Yiling Yang, Qian Ye, Zhizhen Peng +4
    BMC psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  5. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on quality of postoperative recovery following major abdominal surgery: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
    Junwen Tu, Shirong Wei, Yubin Shi +4
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{yang2026efficacy,
  title = {{Efficacy of High‐Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Depression With Insomnia Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials}},
  author = {Wenqing Yang and Songbin Chen and Xiaotong Li and Junhui Chen and Li Li and Jin Yu},
  journal = {Brain and Behavior},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/brb3.71808},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71808},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy of High‐Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Depression With Insomnia Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
AU  - Wenqing Yang
AU  - Songbin Chen
AU  - Xiaotong Li
AU  - Junhui Chen
AU  - Li Li
AU  - Jin Yu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
JO  - Brain and Behavior
DO  - 10.1002/brb3.71808
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71808
AB  - Background: This meta‐analysis evaluated the efficacy of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF‐rTMS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in patients with comorbid depression and insomnia.  Methods: This analysis incorporated 7 studies, involving 709 subjects (control: 342; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS]: 367). All included studies employed left DLPFC‐targeted HF‐rTMS. Treatment effectiveness for comorbid depression and insomnia was assessed. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore possible sources of heterogeneity.  Results: HF‐rTMS significantly improved sleep quality (standardized mean difference [SMD] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.97 [0.23 to 1.71], p = 0.01) and depressive symptoms (0.61 [0.38 to 0.84], p < 0.00001). There was a non‐significant trend toward reduced sleep latency (0.50 [−0.17 to 1.18], p = 0.14). No significant difference in adverse reactions was observed (risk ratio [95% CI]: 1.09 [0.80 to 1.48], p = 0.57). Substantial heterogeneity was identified for the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index outcomes (I 2 = 91%). Subgroup analyses indicated that this heterogeneity was attributed to variations in stimulation frequency and baseline antidepressant use.  Conclusion: Very‑low to low certainty evidence suggests that left DLPFC‑targeted HF‑rTMS may improve sleep quality and depressive symptoms in patients with depression and insomnia symptoms, with a favorable safety profile. However, due to substantial heterogeneity and methodological limitations, these findings should be considered exploratory and warrant confirmation by future high‑quality trials.
SN  - 2162-3279
ER  -