Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Taxonomic classification cost tracks neither sequencing depth nor community richness at single-sample scale: a measured resource protocol for 16S rRNA amplicon pipelines

  1. 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Marker-gene amplicon workflows are routinely run on shared compute, yet the cores, memory and wall time they are given are chosen by convention and not by measurement. We present a protocol for measuring them, applied to the two dominant stages of a QIIME 2 16S rRNA pipeline, DADA2 denoising and Naive Bayes taxonomic classification, across nine upper-respiratory samples from a paediatric otitis media cohort. The two stages do not consume the same input: denoising reads every sequence, classification only those surviving it. Subsampling one library across a 27-fold range of sequencing depth, denoising wall time rose 14.3-fold while classification changed by 1% and its peak memory not at all (3.11 GiB). Amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness rose 2.8-fold over that range, so this is not richness saturating: the stage is dominated by a fixed per-invocation cost. Across a body-site gradient of 5 to 70 ASVs, denoising followed read count (exponent 0.75) while classification followed neither: a 5-ASV effusion and a 70-ASV adenoid community cost 40.81 s and 40.79 s. One ASV took 36.20 s and 218 took 37.27 s, 97% fixed cost. Thread-level parallelism offered little benefit. Denoising peaked at 1.18x near 8 threads and then declined; classification was slower at every setting above one job, consuming 10.5 times the CPU at 40. Representative sequences and their taxonomic assignments were identical at 1, 4 and 40 threads, so a reduced allocation changes what the analysis costs, not what it reports. Extending the query set to 10,000 sequences located two distinct boundaries: eight jobs first beat one at roughly 5,000 queries, and fitted fixed and per-query costs become equal at 15,248. Both lie roughly two orders of magnitude above the richest single sample measured. Practically: size denoising by read count, calibrate classification once against the reference in use, request one job for classification below a few thousand sequences, and take throughput from sample-level parallelism. Protocol, data and analysis code are released with the pipeline.

Related

  1. From deployment to functioning ecosystems: assessing taxonomic richness and community composition on modular shellfish reefs using environmental DNA metabarcoding
    V. Tettamanti, T. Staples, B. Mos +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEcologybioRxiv
  2. Hidden assumptions in nascent RNA sequencing pipelines define reproducibility states
    X. Zhou, C. Feng, Y. Zhao
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  3. Geographic Variation in Peromyscus leucopus Population Size and Small Mammal Community Richness in Northern Pennsylvania
    Michael G. Rowley, Gaimi Davies, Priscilla Langlais +2
    Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyPMCCrossrefEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Systematic evaluation of transcript normalization methods and quantification pipelines across long-read sequencing platforms
    A. Paniagua, F. Jetzinger, S. Tarazona +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. BaseCamp --- An Agentic AI Framework for Automating DNA Sequencing Data Pipelines
    Eranga Bandara, Xueping Liang, Asanga Gunaratna +19
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{victor2026taxonomic,
  title = {{Taxonomic classification cost tracks neither sequencing depth nor community richness at single-sample scale: a measured resource protocol for 16S rRNA amplicon pipelines}},
  author = {S. Victor and S. Sadasivam and Y. S and S. R and S. A. P and G. Satheesh},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.01.748377},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.01.748377v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Taxonomic classification cost tracks neither sequencing depth nor community richness at single-sample scale: a measured resource protocol for 16S rRNA amplicon pipelines
AU  - S. Victor
AU  - S. Sadasivam
AU  - Y. S
AU  - S. R
AU  - S. A. P
AU  - G. Satheesh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.01.748377
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.01.748377v1
AB  - Marker-gene amplicon workflows are routinely run on shared compute, yet the cores, memory and wall time they are given are chosen by convention and not by measurement. We present a protocol for measuring them, applied to the two dominant stages of a QIIME 2 16S rRNA pipeline, DADA2 denoising and Naive Bayes taxonomic classification, across nine upper-respiratory samples from a paediatric otitis media cohort. The two stages do not consume the same input: denoising reads every sequence, classification only those surviving it. Subsampling one library across a 27-fold range of sequencing depth, denoising wall time rose 14.3-fold while classification changed by 1% and its peak memory not at all (3.11 GiB). Amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness rose 2.8-fold over that range, so this is not richness saturating: the stage is dominated by a fixed per-invocation cost. Across a body-site gradient of 5 to 70 ASVs, denoising followed read count (exponent 0.75) while classification followed neither: a 5-ASV effusion and a 70-ASV adenoid community cost 40.81 s and 40.79 s. One ASV took 36.20 s and 218 took 37.27 s, 97% fixed cost. Thread-level parallelism offered little benefit. Denoising peaked at 1.18x near 8 threads and then declined; classification was slower at every setting above one job, consuming 10.5 times the CPU at 40. Representative sequences and their taxonomic assignments were identical at 1, 4 and 40 threads, so a reduced allocation changes what the analysis costs, not what it reports. Extending the query set to 10,000 sequences located two distinct boundaries: eight jobs first beat one at roughly 5,000 queries, and fitted fixed and per-query costs become equal at 15,248. Both lie roughly two orders of magnitude above the richest single sample measured. Practically: size denoising by read count, calibrate classification once against the reference in use, request one job for classification below a few thousand sequences, and take throughput from sample-level parallelism. Protocol, data and analysis code are released with the pipeline.
ER  -