Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCancers

From Molecular Alterations to Risk Prediction: Biomarkers of Actinic Keratosis Progression to Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

  1. 1Department of Dermatology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany.
  2. 2Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Ruhr University Bochum, 44789 Bochum, Germany.

Abstract

The high-and in most countries steadily increasing-incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) represents a growing public health challenge. As the majority of cSCCs arise from pre-existing actinic keratosis (AKs), these lesions are recognized as the principal precursors of invasive disease. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving the progression from AK to cSCC is essential for advancing prevention, facilitating early diagnosis, and enabling targeted therapies. Moreover, this knowledge provides a basis for identifying biomarkers that can predict the risk of malignant transformation. The progression from AK to cSCC is a complex, multistep process driven by the gradual accumulation of genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironmental alterations. Over the past decades, numerous molecular changes associated with this transition have been identified. However, no single biomarker has demonstrated sufficient predictive accuracy for clinical use. This reflects the pronounced molecular heterogeneity of AKs as no individual alteration is uniformly present in all lesions that undergo malignant progression. In addition, numerous proposed biomarkers are also detected in non-progressive AKs and even in non-neoplastic skin, which compromises their sensitivity and specificity for predicting progression to cSCC. Current evidence, therefore, suggests that the most promising strategy for identifying AKs at greatest risk of malignant transformation is the development of a multi-marker panel. This panel, ideally, should integrate molecular signatures encompassing genetic, epigenetic, proliferative, inflammatory, and microenvironmental markers. This review summarizes the molecular factors that currently represent the most promising candidates for inclusion in such a multi-marker panel and discusses their potential clinical utility, while emphasizing the need for validation in well-designed prospective longitudinal studies.

Related

  1. Multimodal biomarkers and prediction models for stricturing and penetrating progression in Crohn's disease
    Jingyao Yin, Ting Lei, Qingyi Zhao +5
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Identification of CRF-related molecular subtypes and a prognostic CRRS model in glioma: insights into immunotherapy response prediction and candidate biomarkers
    Jihao Xue, Jianguo Xu, Qijia Yin +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Human geneticsCrossref
  3. A Systems Biology Model Linking Peripheral NIMETOX Biomarkers to Multilevel Brain Structural and Functional Alterations Across Major Depression and Schizophrenia
    H. Wu, C. Yang, Y. He +14
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  4. ATF4 and SLC7A11 as biomarkers predicting progression and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma
    Yanjie Liu, Dongli Guo, Daojuan Li +1
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  5. Associations of multiregional OCTA metrics and systemic hematologic biomarkers With 12-month diabetic retinopathy progression
    Lina Ge, Shenghai Huang, Weihe Zhou +4
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{meyer2026from,
  title = {{From Molecular Alterations to Risk Prediction: Biomarkers of Actinic Keratosis Progression to Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.}},
  author = {Thomas Meyer and Lea Stockfleth and Kerstin Lang and Heiko U Käfferlein and Thomas Brüning and Eggert Stockfleth},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18193221},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882915},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - From Molecular Alterations to Risk Prediction: Biomarkers of Actinic Keratosis Progression to Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
AU  - Thomas Meyer
AU  - Lea Stockfleth
AU  - Kerstin Lang
AU  - Heiko U Käfferlein
AU  - Thomas Brüning
AU  - Eggert Stockfleth
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18193221
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882915
AB  - The high-and in most countries steadily increasing-incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) represents a growing public health challenge. As the majority of cSCCs arise from pre-existing actinic keratosis (AKs), these lesions are recognized as the principal precursors of invasive disease. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving the progression from AK to cSCC is essential for advancing prevention, facilitating early diagnosis, and enabling targeted therapies. Moreover, this knowledge provides a basis for identifying biomarkers that can predict the risk of malignant transformation. The progression from AK to cSCC is a complex, multistep process driven by the gradual accumulation of genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironmental alterations. Over the past decades, numerous molecular changes associated with this transition have been identified. However, no single biomarker has demonstrated sufficient predictive accuracy for clinical use. This reflects the pronounced molecular heterogeneity of AKs as no individual alteration is uniformly present in all lesions that undergo malignant progression. In addition, numerous proposed biomarkers are also detected in non-progressive AKs and even in non-neoplastic skin, which compromises their sensitivity and specificity for predicting progression to cSCC. Current evidence, therefore, suggests that the most promising strategy for identifying AKs at greatest risk of malignant transformation is the development of a multi-marker panel. This panel, ideally, should integrate molecular signatures encompassing genetic, epigenetic, proliferative, inflammatory, and microenvironmental markers. This review summarizes the molecular factors that currently represent the most promising candidates for inclusion in such a multi-marker panel and discusses their potential clinical utility, while emphasizing the need for validation in well-designed prospective longitudinal studies.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -