Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

An equality condition for the Dobrushin bound on attention rollout and how often it holds in trained transformers

Abstract

The Dobrushin coefficient of each attention-rollout factor satisfies κ(1/2(I+A))≤1/2(1+κ(A)), and multiplying these inequalities over layers bounds the coefficient of the whole rollout. We characterise exactly when the layerwise bound is tight: equality holds if and only if some token pair attaining κ(A) is mutually self-dominant - each of the two attends to itself at least as strongly as the other attends to it. The condition is far from automatic: uniformly random stochastic matrices satisfy it only 24-30% of the time. When tested on the head-averaged attention of each individual input and restricted to content tokens - image patches, words or tabular features, excluding cls, register and separator tokens - the condition holds for essentially every input at every layer of DINOv2 (three model sizes), RoBERTa and DistilBERT. In the supervised models DeiT-B and ViT-B/16 it holds for 91% and 64% of input-layer pairs respectively, with all failures occurring late in depth. In FT-Transformer trained on two standard tabular benchmarks it holds for only 11-44% of input-layer pairs. The special tokens account for almost all failures in DINOv2 and the language models: when they are included, the condition holds for only 82-97% of input-layer pairs.

Related

  1. Jensen' s trace inequality with equality condition and noncommutative Lamperti's theorem
    Kai Fang, Xin He, Jinghao Huang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  2. Asymptotic Analysis of Discrete-Time Self-Attention Dynamics in Transformers
    Claudio Altafini
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textDynamical systemsarXiv
  3. Local Geometric Mixing via Dobrushin Contraction with Applications to Diffusion Path Monte Carlo and the Proximal Sampler
    Stefan Oberdörster
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
  4. BASIS: Batchwise Advantage Estimation from Single-Rollout Information Sharing for LLM Reasoning
    Shijin Gong, Erhan Xu, Kai Ye +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Occupation-Weighted Performance Bounds for Rollout Policies in Stochastic Shortest Path Problems
    Anders Hansson, Bo Wahlberg
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{rola2026equality,
  title = {{An equality condition for the Dobrushin bound on attention rollout and how often it holds in trained transformers}},
  author = {Przemysław Rola},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.05558},
  eprint = {2610.05558},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05558},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - An equality condition for the Dobrushin bound on attention rollout and how often it holds in trained transformers
AU  - Przemysław Rola
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/04
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.05558
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05558
AB  - The Dobrushin coefficient of each attention-rollout factor satisfies κ(1/2(I+A))≤1/2(1+κ(A)), and multiplying these inequalities over layers bounds the coefficient of the whole rollout. We characterise exactly when the layerwise bound is tight: equality holds if and only if some token pair attaining κ(A) is mutually self-dominant - each of the two attends to itself at least as strongly as the other attends to it. The condition is far from automatic: uniformly random stochastic matrices satisfy it only 24-30% of the time. When tested on the head-averaged attention of each individual input and restricted to content tokens - image patches, words or tabular features, excluding cls, register and separator tokens - the condition holds for essentially every input at every layer of DINOv2 (three model sizes), RoBERTa and DistilBERT. In the supervised models DeiT-B and ViT-B/16 it holds for 91% and 64% of input-layer pairs respectively, with all failures occurring late in depth. In FT-Transformer trained on two standard tabular benchmarks it holds for only 11-44% of input-layer pairs. The special tokens account for almost all failures in DINOv2 and the language models: when they are included, the condition holds for only 82-97% of input-layer pairs.
ER  -