Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
184,584 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintCC0arXiv

Cohen--Macaulayness of Inc(ℕ)-Invariant Chains of Edge Ideals

Abstract

Let (Gn)n≥ n0 be a family of graphs on [n] whose edge ideals In⊆ Rn=k[x1,…,xn] form an Inc(ℕ)-invariant chain, In+r=Inc(ℕ)n,n+r(In) for n≥ n0, r≥0. We determine which pairs (n,r) make Rn+r/In+r Cohen--Macaulay, for five classical families: line graphs Ln, complements of line graphs Lnc, complete graphs Kn, cyclic graphs Cn, and complements of cyclic graphs Cnc. For line graphs we give the generators of In+r, the height and Krull dimension of Rn+r/In+r, and a complete classification: for n≥5, Rn+r/In+r is Cohen--Macaulay if and only if r=n−4. For complements of line graphs, complete graphs, and complements of cyclic graphs, we show the chain is Cohen--Macaulay unconditionally, for every r≥0; the first and third arise from the same underlying phenomenon, in which the Inc(ℕ)-invariant chain reproduces the original graph itself at each step. For cyclic graphs we prove Inc(ℕ)n,n+r(I(Cn))=I(Kn+r) once r≥ n−3, giving Cohen--Macaulayness in this range, and conjecture -- with supporting computational and structural evidence -- a complete classification: Cohen--Macaulayness holds if and only if r≥⌊(n−4)/2⌋ and r≠ n−4.

Related

  1. Prime and Cohen-Macaulay ideals of 2-minors with linear resolution
    Takayuki Hibi, Ayesha Asloob Qureshi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Cohen-Macaulay higher conormal and Kähler differential modules of squarefree monomial ideals
    Tài Huy Hà, Nguyen Cong Minh
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Alternating Divisoriality of Prime Ideals along Infinite Chains of Bézout Domains
    Viet-Hoang Tran, Tan M. Nguyen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Stabilization index of V-number of powers of edge ideals of graphs
    Ha Thi Thu Hien, Thanh Vu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. Symbolic Powers and Asymptotic Invariants of GL-Invariant Ideals
    Sankhaneel Bisui, Alexandra Seceleanu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{anwar2026cohenmacaulayness,
  title = {{Cohen--Macaulayness of $\mathrmInc(\mathbbN)$-Invariant Chains of Edge Ideals}},
  author = {Imran Anwar and Mughees Ghayas and Azhar Javed},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.03566},
  eprint = {2609.03566},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03566},
  note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cohen--Macaulayness of Inc(ℕ)-Invariant Chains of Edge Ideals
AU  - Imran Anwar
AU  - Mughees Ghayas
AU  - Azhar Javed
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.03566
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03566
AB  - Let (G_n)_n≥ n_0 be a family of graphs on [n] whose edge ideals I_n⊆ R_n=k[x_1,…,x_n] form an Inc(ℕ)-invariant chain, I_n+r=Inc(ℕ)_n,n+r(I_n) for n≥ n_0, r≥0. We determine which pairs (n,r) make R_n+r/I_n+r Cohen--Macaulay, for five classical families: line graphs L_n, complements of line graphs L_n^c, complete graphs K_n, cyclic graphs C_n, and complements of cyclic graphs C_n^c. For line graphs we give the generators of I_n+r, the height and Krull dimension of R_n+r/I_n+r, and a complete classification: for n≥5, R_n+r/I_n+r is Cohen--Macaulay if and only if r=n−4. For complements of line graphs, complete graphs, and complements of cyclic graphs, we show the chain is Cohen--Macaulay unconditionally, for every r≥0; the first and third arise from the same underlying phenomenon, in which the Inc(ℕ)-invariant chain reproduces the original graph itself at each step. For cyclic graphs we prove Inc(ℕ)_n,n+r(I(C_n))=I(K_n+r) once r≥ n−3, giving Cohen--Macaulayness in this range, and conjecture -- with supporting computational and structural evidence -- a complete classification: Cohen--Macaulayness holds if and only if r≥⌊(n−4)/2⌋ and r≠ n−4.
ER  -