Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,783 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Inertial effects on the mechanical efficiency of a semi-passive oscillating hydrofoil energy harvester

Abstract

Oscillating-foil-based energy harvesters have demonstrated strong potential for low-speed hydrokinetic energy extraction; however, the actuator-level mechanical energy balance associated with prescribed pitching motion remains poorly understood. The present work experimentally characterizes how foil mass ratio, pitching-axis location, and reduced frequency jointly govern the hydrodynamic and mechanical efficiencies of a semi-passive oscillating hydrofoil. Results show that rotational inertia redistributes actuator demand through phase-dependent torque exchange, while heave-pitch coupling can partially cancel this demand when favorably phased. Pitching-axis location modifies the phase and direction of the fluid torque through changes in the effective hydrodynamic moment arm. Reduced frequency governs the balance between enhanced unsteady loading and inertia-amplified actuator demand. Optimal performance is achieved within reduced frequency region of 0.125-0.16 using quarter-chord to one-third-chord pitching axes and relatively low foil mass ratios from about 0.5 to 2.0, yielding a peak mechanical efficiency of 33.96% -- which can diverge from the hydrodynamic efficiency by approximately 38.16% depending on configuration. Torque-loop analysis and PIV measurements show that this synchronization is a key mechanism governing the observed efficiency trends.

Versions

Related

  1. Thermoresponsive self-oscillating hydrogel: spatially lumped model, relaxation dynamics and mechanical output
    Yunjie Wang, Ling Yuan, Yang Li +5
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Restoring Invariance to the Mechanical Wave Equation across Inertial Frames
    Ashmeet Singh, Heather Romero Michel
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsarXiv
  3. Data of a triboelectric energy harvester in low frequency environment and its potential as a power source in a wireless sensor node
    Marios Kaminiotis, Julien Le Scornec, Romain Noël +2
    Data in BriefPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationHAL
  4. Optimal Control of an Electromechanical Energy Harvester
    Dario Lucente, Alessandro Manacorda, Andrea Plati +2
    EntropyPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedCondensed matterStatistical & nonlinear physicsHAL
  5. Magnetohydrodynamic drag on an oscillating sphere in a rotating spherical cavity
    David Cébron, Paolo Personnettaz
    Journal of Fluid MechanicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textFluid dynamicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026inertial,
  title = {{Inertial effects on the mechanical efficiency of a semi-passive oscillating hydrofoil energy harvester}},
  author = {Zihan Zhang and Qimin Feng and Yuanhang Zhu and Qiang Zhong},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.11126},
  eprint = {2606.11126},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11126},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Inertial effects on the mechanical efficiency of a semi-passive oscillating hydrofoil energy harvester
AU  - Zihan Zhang
AU  - Qimin Feng
AU  - Yuanhang Zhu
AU  - Qiang Zhong
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.11126
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11126
AB  - Oscillating-foil-based energy harvesters have demonstrated strong potential for low-speed hydrokinetic energy extraction; however, the actuator-level mechanical energy balance associated with prescribed pitching motion remains poorly understood. The present work experimentally characterizes how foil mass ratio, pitching-axis location, and reduced frequency jointly govern the hydrodynamic and mechanical efficiencies of a semi-passive oscillating hydrofoil. Results show that rotational inertia redistributes actuator demand through phase-dependent torque exchange, while heave-pitch coupling can partially cancel this demand when favorably phased. Pitching-axis location modifies the phase and direction of the fluid torque through changes in the effective hydrodynamic moment arm. Reduced frequency governs the balance between enhanced unsteady loading and inertia-amplified actuator demand. Optimal performance is achieved within reduced frequency region of 0.125-0.16 using quarter-chord to one-third-chord pitching axes and relatively low foil mass ratios from about 0.5 to 2.0, yielding a peak mechanical efficiency of 33.96% -- which can diverge from the hydrodynamic efficiency by approximately 38.16% depending on configuration. Torque-loop analysis and PIV measurements show that this synchronization is a key mechanism governing the observed efficiency trends.
ER  -