Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCardiology research

Prognostic Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

  1. 1Department of Geriatric Cardiology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China
  2. 2Department of Health Medicine, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is common in elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its prognostic significance and the optimal screening tool remain unclear. This retrospective, single-center study aimed to compare the application of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in assessing nutritional status in very elderly patients with HFpEF, and to evaluate the association between nutritional status and clinical outcomes.

Methods: A total of 196 patients aged ≥ 75 years (mean age 92.12 ± 4.28 years, 86.2% male) with HFpEF were enrolled. Nutritional status was categorized using CONUT and GNRI according to standard cut-offs.

Results: Patients with higher CONUT scores or lower GNRI scores (indicating worse nutritional status) had significantly longer hospital stays, lower levels of nutrition-related indices (albumin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum ferritin, transferrin saturation), lower lymphocyte counts, and higher NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6)) (all P < 0.05). Over a median follow-up of 11.5 months, 83 patients (42.3%) died. In unadjusted analyses, patients with worse nutritional status had significantly higher rates of all-cause death, all-cause readmission, and heart failure-related readmission (all P < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that CONUT (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.366, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.181–1.579, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality, while GNRI (HR = 0.962, 95% CI: 0.927–0.999, P = 0.043) was a protective factor. The CONUT and GNRI showed poor consistency (κ = 0.235, P < 0.01). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis based on vital status at the end of follow-up, the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting all-cause mortality was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91) for CONUT, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86) for GNRI, and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82–0.92) for a combined model incorporating both scores via logistic regression. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis showed that compared with the GNRI score, the NRI of the CONUT score was 0.580 (95% CI: 0.309–0.852), and the NRI of the combined score was 0.760 (95% CI: 0.499–1.022), both reaching statistical significance (P < 0.01). By contrast, the NRI was 0.083 (95% CI: −0.197 to 0.363, P = 0.560) for the combined score versus the CONUT score.

Conclusions: Malnutrition is common in elderly patients with HFpEF. CONUT and GNRI scores are associated with adverse outcomes. Compared with GNRI alone, the combined assessment of the two scores improves predictive performance for adverse prognosis in elderly patients with HFpEF, while no incremental benefit is observed over CONUT alone.

Related

  1. Prognostic Nutritional Index, Circulating Bacterial and Viral DNA, and Neurocognitive Vulnerability in Geriatric Inpatients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Gretta Veronica Badillo Pazmay, Patrizia D’Aquila, Carlo Fortunato +28
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Controlling nutritional status score as a novel prognostic tool for hospital mortality risk stratification in sepsis: a large-scale retrospective cohort analysis.
    Wei Song, Hai-Bin Yin, Dan Liu +3
    BMC infectious diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Association of preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index and geriatric nutritional risk index with prolonged postoperative length of stay in older patients with hip fracture : A retrospective cohort study
    Jinguang Zhang, Xiao Yu, Dongxu Sun
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Association between preoperative geriatric nutritional risk index and early postoperative cognitive decline after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Yanlong Fu, Qiang Wei, Wenxin Shi
    Frontiers in nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  5. CT-Defined Low Skeletal Muscle Mass, Prognostic Nutritional Index, and Anemia in Relation to In-Hospital Major Morbidity After Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Mujdat Turan, Sumeyra Guler, Yasin Hatipoglu +2
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{li2026prognostic,
  title = {{Prognostic Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction}},
  author = {Yao Li and Hai Rui Shao and Ying Liu and Jing Yu Wang and Yu Gang Yin and Chun Yang and Xian Wang and Yong Zhong and Lei Lv},
  journal = {Cardiology research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.14740/cr2282},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719639},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prognostic Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
AU  - Yao Li
AU  - Hai Rui Shao
AU  - Ying Liu
AU  - Jing Yu Wang
AU  - Yu Gang Yin
AU  - Chun Yang
AU  - Xian Wang
AU  - Yong Zhong
AU  - Lei Lv
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Cardiology research
DO  - 10.14740/cr2282
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719639
AB  - Background: Malnutrition is common in elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its prognostic significance and the optimal screening tool remain unclear. This retrospective, single-center study aimed to compare the application of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in assessing nutritional status in very elderly patients with HFpEF, and to evaluate the association between nutritional status and clinical outcomes.  Methods: A total of 196 patients aged ≥ 75 years (mean age 92.12 ± 4.28 years, 86.2% male) with HFpEF were enrolled. Nutritional status was categorized using CONUT and GNRI according to standard cut-offs.  Results: Patients with higher CONUT scores or lower GNRI scores (indicating worse nutritional status) had significantly longer hospital stays, lower levels of nutrition-related indices (albumin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum ferritin, transferrin saturation), lower lymphocyte counts, and higher NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6)) (all P < 0.05). Over a median follow-up of 11.5 months, 83 patients (42.3%) died. In unadjusted analyses, patients with worse nutritional status had significantly higher rates of all-cause death, all-cause readmission, and heart failure-related readmission (all P < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that CONUT (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.366, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.181–1.579, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality, while GNRI (HR = 0.962, 95% CI: 0.927–0.999, P = 0.043) was a protective factor. The CONUT and GNRI showed poor consistency (κ = 0.235, P < 0.01). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis based on vital status at the end of follow-up, the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting all-cause mortality was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91) for CONUT, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86) for GNRI, and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82–0.92) for a combined model incorporating both scores via logistic regression. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis showed that compared with the GNRI score, the NRI of the CONUT score was 0.580 (95% CI: 0.309–0.852), and the NRI of the combined score was 0.760 (95% CI: 0.499–1.022), both reaching statistical significance (P < 0.01). By contrast, the NRI was 0.083 (95% CI: −0.197 to 0.363, P = 0.560) for the combined score versus the CONUT score.  Conclusions: Malnutrition is common in elderly patients with HFpEF. CONUT and GNRI scores are associated with adverse outcomes. Compared with GNRI alone, the combined assessment of the two scores improves predictive performance for adverse prognosis in elderly patients with HFpEF, while no incremental benefit is observed over CONUT alone.
SN  - 1923-2829
SN  - 1923-2837
ER  -