Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A Boundary-Layer Mechanism for One-Third Scaling in Online Softmax Classification

Abstract

Hard-label classification is usually trained with smooth surrogate losses such as softmax cross-entropy. We isolate a mechanism by which this mismatch between smooth surrogate and discrete labels produces power-law learning curves for a one-layer softmax student trained by online SGD on Gaussian inputs with argmax teacher labels. In the thermodynamic limit, the dynamics reduce to a growing student-teacher alignment and a residual student variance sustained by SGD noise. At late times, only shrinking layers of examples around teacher decision boundaries remain active. This yields an α−1/3 law in training time α not only for the test loss but also for the generalization error, one minus test accuracy. The error law is an online-noise effect. The loss law persists without gradient noise. Learning-rate annealing separates the two exponents, improving the error exponent from 1/3 toward 1/2 while slowing the loss. Simulations support the predictions. Correlated Gaussian inputs and whitened pretrained features change transients, not the late-time decay. Experiments with deep neural networks can show compatible error scaling. The mechanism is asymptotic and complementary to spectral explanations and data-statistics explanations of neural scaling laws.

Related

  1. Scaling of boundary-layer disturbances exposed to free-stream turbulence
    Pierre Ricco
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  2. Physics-Constrained Symbolic Regression for Mean-Velocity and Mixing-Length Scaling in Zero-Pressure-Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers
    Xianglin Shan, Weiwei Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  3. Mean flow scaling in stably stratified temporally developing turbulent boundary layers
    Baptiste Hardy, Pedro Costa
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  4. Boundary-contact repolarization provides a mechanism for directional guidance of neural crest cell collectives
    Aditya Shankar Paspunurwar, Hector Gomez
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBiological & medical physicsarXiv
  5. Towards Scaling Quantum Fine-Tuning of Foundational Time Series Models for Classification
    Sang Hyub Kim, Julien Baglio, Rajiv Krishnakumar +7
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kuhn2026boundarylayer,
  title = {{A Boundary-Layer Mechanism for One-Third Scaling in Online Softmax Classification}},
  author = {Marcel Kühn and Yoon Thelge and Bernd Rosenow},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.22341},
  eprint = {2605.22341},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22341},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Boundary-Layer Mechanism for One-Third Scaling in Online Softmax Classification
AU  - Marcel Kühn
AU  - Yoon Thelge
AU  - Bernd Rosenow
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.22341
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22341
AB  - Hard-label classification is usually trained with smooth surrogate losses such as softmax cross-entropy. We isolate a mechanism by which this mismatch between smooth surrogate and discrete labels produces power-law learning curves for a one-layer softmax student trained by online SGD on Gaussian inputs with argmax teacher labels. In the thermodynamic limit, the dynamics reduce to a growing student-teacher alignment and a residual student variance sustained by SGD noise. At late times, only shrinking layers of examples around teacher decision boundaries remain active. This yields an α^−1/3 law in training time α not only for the test loss but also for the generalization error, one minus test accuracy. The error law is an online-noise effect. The loss law persists without gradient noise. Learning-rate annealing separates the two exponents, improving the error exponent from 1/3 toward 1/2 while slowing the loss. Simulations support the predictions. Correlated Gaussian inputs and whitened pretrained features change transients, not the late-time decay. Experiments with deep neural networks can show compatible error scaling. The mechanism is asymptotic and complementary to spectral explanations and data-statistics explanations of neural scaling laws.
ER  -